Next Einstein Giovanni Amelino-Camelia against Original Einstein(Divine Albert)

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/13-e-nste-n
"Could the Next Einstein Be a Surfer Dude? Six iconoclasts who could
revolutionize physics—again....4. Giovanni Amelino-Camelia: 42,
University of Rome–Sapienza, Italy. Body of work: His “doubly special
relativity” posits that the supposedly constant speed of light
actually depends on its wavelength and that space has a minimum
distance. His theory could unify physics and help explain the early
growth of the universe, but experimental proof seems to be a tall
order. Einsteinian trait: Rejects accepted physics on the basis of
logic arguments."

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...l/418034a.html
Next Einstein Giovanni Amelino-Camelia: "Galileo–Newton theory was
superseded by Einstein's theory of special relativity, but, after a
century of success, that too is now being questioned."

Einstein's idiocies should have been questioned and refuted in 1907:

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm
"Einstein's Legacy -- Where are the "Einsteinians?", Lee Smolin:
"Quantum theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few
people have appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories
of relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that
the laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that
the speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how
the source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that
theory are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary
relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not
absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF
INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG
WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PUBLISHING IT."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers...UP_TimesNR.pdf
"What Can We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the
Theory of Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there
is no comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The
constancy of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect
homogeneity of spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a
special velocity at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same
velocity everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to
general relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of
light. Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

Pentcho Valev

On Jun 20, 4:12 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/13-e-nste-n
"Could the Next Einstein Be a Surfer Dude? Six iconoclasts who could
revolutionize physics--again....4. Giovanni Amelino-Camelia: 42,
University of Rome-Sapienza, Italy. Body of work: His "doubly special
relativity" posits that the supposedly constant speed of light
actually depends on its wavelength and that space has a minimum
distance. His theory could unify physics and help explain the early
growth of the universe, but experimental proof seems to be a tall
order. Einsteinian trait: Rejects accepted physics on the basis of
logic arguments."

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...l/418034a.html
Next Einstein Giovanni Amelino-Camelia: "Galileo-Newton theory was
superseded by Einstein's theory of special relativity, but, after a
century of success, that too is now being questioned."

Einstein's idiocies should have been questioned and refuted in 1907:

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm
"Einstein's Legacy -- Where are the "Einsteinians?", Lee Smolin:
"Quantum theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few
people have appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories
of relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that
the laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that
the speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how
the source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that
theory are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary
relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not
absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF
INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG
WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PUBLISHING IT."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers...UP_TimesNR.pdf
"What Can We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the
Theory of Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there
is no comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The
constancy of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect
homogeneity of spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a
special velocity at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same
velocity everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to
general relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of
light. Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

All next Einsteins in Einstein criminal cult are next Einsteins just
because they all promise to solve the following problem:

"How to abandon Einstein's 1905 false light postulate without
abandoning Einstein's 1905 false light postulate?"

This particular next Einstein called Giovanni Amelino-Camelia has
discovered the following formula for an inconstant speed of light
(momentum-dependent speed of light) that violates Einstein's 1905
false light postulate without violating Einstein's 1905 false light
postulate:

http://www.to.astro.it/biblioteca/oa...Lb_510_255.pdf
Next Einstein Giovanni Amelino-Camelia: "...a deformed speed-of-light
law for photons v(p)=c(1+çL_p|p|/2).The momentum dependence of this
speed-of-light law imposes that any uncertainty on the momentum of a
photon used in length measurements induces an associated uncertainty
in the speed of the photon."

Pentcho Valev

Some formulas in special relativity and the twin paradox
Victor Orsini

In his 1905 paper, Einstein follows the same line of reasoning that Lorentz had followed. Given the constancy of the speed of light, length contraction in the direction of motion relative to a static observer, is evident. The delay in time is not evident and needs to be derived from longitudinal contraction. The delay is a function of the contraction.

Consider two systems of reference, one static and other in motion relative to the first. Let’s call c the constant speed of light which is the same for the two systems.

In the static system, it is satisfied

c = lr / tr

where lr is the distance traveled by light in the rest frame and tr the time the light takes to travel it. tr is calculated as tr = lr / c.

In the system in relative motion also holds that

c = lm / tm

where lm is the distance traveled and tm is the time delay. tm is calculated as tm = lm / c.

The length contraction in the moving system can be written as the difference between the length in the moving system minus the length in the static system, so

contraction = lr - lm

Similarly, the time delay can be defined as the difference in time the light takes to travel lr in the system at rest minus the time it takes to travel lm in the moving system

delay = tr - tm

Substituting lr by tr / c and tm by lm / c we obtain

delay = tr - tm = lr / c - lm / c = (lr - lm) / c = contraction / c

Taking the first and the last term we have the equality

delay = contraction / c

It is clear that the delay turns zero when contraction becomes zero.
Einstein himself states that, when movement stops, the contraction in the direction of motion becomes zero. This demonstration implies that the delay turns zero when movement stops together with the contraction .

QED

This shows that the clock does not return late because the delay stops when motion stops. Equally, the traveling twin does not return younger, otherwise he will be a plane figure.

PD: Explanation

The expression obtained for the delay, is an obvious and direct result of the constancy of the speed of light that can be expressed as:

c = contraction / delay = lr / tr = lm / tm

This truth may be obscured if we take a bar of fixed length (that does not grow over time) and it is compared with a watch going indefinitely . This is because they compare different phenomena.

Be clear that, if the contraction of a millimeter goes away when movement stops, also the contraction of a meter or a billion of meters disappears when movement stops. Equally, if contraction of a millisecond becomes zero, the contraction of an hour or of a thousand million years also disappears.

For the constancy of the speed of light to be maintained, it is necessary that the delay disappear when ever contraction disappears.