Final Theory

In a new book called "Final Theory", author Mark Albert contends that
Einstein unlocked the secret of the universe and then entrusted parts
of it to each of his students at the Priceton Institute of Advanced
Study. Now they are dropping like flies because evil forces are trying
to piece together the theory!

..

On May 27, 2:36*pm, Double-A wrote:

In a new book called "Final Theory", author Mark Albert contends that
Einstein unlocked the secret of the universe and then entrusted parts
of it to each of his students at the Priceton Institute of Advanced
Study. Now they are dropping like flies because evil forces are trying
to piece together the theory!

Heh. Sounds like "E=mc^3".
:-)

On May 28, 4:37 am, oldcoot wrote:
On May 27, 2:36 pm, Double-A wrote:

In a new book called "Final Theory", author Mark Albert contends that
Einstein unlocked the secret of the universe and then entrusted parts
of it to each of his students at the Priceton Institute of Advanced
Study. Now they are dropping like flies because evil forces are trying
to piece together the theory!

Heh. Sounds like "E=mc^3".
:-)

How about just "E=m$B!g(B" or if necessary "E=m$B!g(B^2"
.. - BG

oc It is G=EMC^2 Why not? Bert

On May 28, 5:03 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
oc It is G=EMC^2 Why not? Bert

Why not in deed, except C isn't a cosmic constant, other than within
dark matter. Our universe is mostly a God fart of dark matter.
.. - Brad Guth

"Double-A" wrote in message
...
In a new book called "Final Theory", author Mark Albert contends that
Einstein unlocked the secret of the universe and then entrusted parts
of it to each of his students at the Priceton Institute of Advanced
Study. Now they are dropping like flies because evil forces are trying
to piece together the theory!

There is only one Final Theory, and that is: we don't have a clue.
It is my humble opinion, that the one and only Universe we know
of for certain, is expanding. But, it will eventually slow down,
reverse its course and violently collapse upon itself, to give birth
to a new Big Bang.

Being humans, we have the need to see everything in an orderly
sequence, and if it is just beyond our grasp of understanding, we
make up ****. String theory, with its 11 dimension ... what a joke.
Most of us have trouble incorporating time as the fourth dimension,
much less six more, something only a truly warped mind, whose
paycheck comes from dufuses like us, paying him/her to spew that
kind of unrealistic crap, could envision.

The fact that humans have the need to be masters of their realm, gave
us such fantasies as religion, with the ensuing promise of utopia in
paradise, or fire and brimstone in hell, if you ever smoked any of the
killer weed or humped your brother's wife, or farted in the pew on
holy Sunday, you know when the faithful go looking for eggs laid by
a rabbit ... do I need to expound?.

We don't know, and we won't know until we have the technology to
go there and take a look-see. Until then, we have all these instruments
which can give us hints of the way beyond, but it is conjecture, at best,
yet we think we ****ing know it all.

But Hawking got it right: Black holes are solid matter, atomic
sub-sub-sub components packed so densely, that there is mo more
space, no rebound of collapsing matter as in a super nova, there is
nothing but solid matter. And it will leak into space, one micro-
micro-micro particle at a time, until the disassembly and the re-birth
of our Universe is complete and those tiny sub atomic particles start
to gravitate towards each other ... a new Big Bang in the making.

On May 28, 7:20*pm, "Hagar" wrote :

But Hawking got it right: Black holes are solid matter, atomic
sub-sub-sub components packed so densely, that there is mo more
space, no rebound of collapsing matter as in a super nova, there is
nothing but solid matter.

And the denser it's compactified, the smaller the volume, the faster
it spins due to conserved angular momentum.. until the centrifugal
effect reaches criticality...

... a new Big Bang in the making.

A new 'one-shot' BB. Ker-blooey!

But 'What If'' the inflow rate into the BH is sufficient to 'keep up'
with the outflow rate? It'd comprize a homeostatic closed-loop system.
The 'Bang' point would actually be continuously running like the
combustion chamber of a gas turbine engine (or, the central compressor
in the freon cycle analogy).

It is my humble opinion, that the one and only Universe we know
of for certain, is expanding. *But, it will eventually slow down,
reverse its course and violently collapse upon itself, to give birth
to a new Big Bang.

That's the view from our 'inside' referance frame. We sense there
musta been a superhot Genesis Event somewhere in our deep past outside
our visibility, and dub it the 'Big Bang'. In the freon cycle analogy,
a little cluster of freon molecules in the expanded gas stream
represents the whole sphere of our visible cosmos. And we're in the
center of the "cluster" and know nothing of the 'outside'. But if we
could mentally transpose to the 'outside' frame, we might see the
mechanism at work behind the 'Bang' and realize it's a continuously-
running Process.. with each phase, the 'Bang', Expansion, Contraction,
and final Implosion running continuously at its respective station on
the cycle.

oc if BH are solid matter(that I doubt) it begs the question what
surface feature does this ball of matter have? It must be smoother than
an 8 ball. Is it the closest to a perfect circle that nature can
achieve? We never talk about a BH surface. We only talk about its event
horizon that is an imaginary boundary A boundary that is part of
natures balancing act Bert

On May 29, 6:05*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

...if BH are solid matter(that I doubt) it begs the question what
surface feature does this ball of matter have? *It must be smoother than
an 8 ball. Is it the closest to a perfect circle that nature can
achieve? *

Well, it'd be a perfect sphere as in the Schwartzchild (non-rotating)
model. But what if it has spin? Wouldn't it flatten out somewhat like
the 'ring singularity' of the Kerr model? And the faster it spins,
wouldn't it keep flattening out more and more like pizza dough? And if
the spin rate/flattening reaches the point where *tangental velocity*
at the rim reaches what we call 'c'... ?

We never talk about a BH surface. We only talk about its event
horizon that is an imaginary boundary,*a boundary that is part of
natures balancing act...

...a boundary between the pre-BB state and the externalized cosmos
'out here' perhaps?

"oldcoot" wrote in message...
...
On May 27, 2:36 pm, Double-A wrote:

In a new book called "Final Theory", author Mark Albert contends that
Einstein unlocked the secret of the universe and then entrusted parts
of it to each of his students at the Priceton Institute of Advanced
Study. Now they are dropping like flies because evil forces are trying
to piece together the theory!

Heh. Sounds like "E=mc^3".
:-)

Definitely sounds like a job for the "Charmed Ones"!

(aka "The Power of Three") g

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine

P.S. Thank YOU for reading!

P.P.S. Some secret sites (shh)...
http://painellsworth.net
http://savethechildren.org
http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com