![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, everyone. This is another quick and informal observing
report to keep up the signal-to-noise ratio, I hope, and also to convey the sheer excitement of an experience which curiously does seem to fit the title "Star Trek" -- a journey of some four hours from Corvus to Sagittarius and M25 through the beautiful southern skies. Using 15X70 binoculars, I started a bit before midnight (PDT, 7 hours earlier than UT) in Corvus, starhopping north from Delta Corvi to find the area of M104, although I'm not sure if I've yet seen it through urban skyglow even with a 20cm f/6 Dob. Then to the main item on my planned agenda: surveying some of Centaurus. While I didn't seem to observe any DSO's in that constellation, I did get a look at Zeta Centauri at around -47-o declination. That's about the limit of my unobstructed view, and some 4-o above the theoretical horizon. As a bright point source, Zeta Centauri was easily spotted through the shifting haze and fringes of local light trespass; it remains an open question whether or how well I would be able to see extended objects this low. Anyway, getting down to 47-o wasn't a bad start. For this I used a "catbird seat" -- basically a large pillow that would elevate me and give me a view of lower altitudes through the window of my live-in observatory, also known as my apartment. To observe things at less "envelope-pushing" declinations, I can simply sit or lean back with the binoculars. The area around Zeta Centauri has a beautiful asterism, and I enjoyed it for its own sake even while considering the combination of good timing and a clear horizon that I would need to see NGC 5139, Omega Centauri, which is the original motivation for this exercise. Then moving on, at around 00:58 I spotted a delightful trapezoid in the neighboring constellation of Lupus, which led me by 0110 to a star I had noted in the _Millennium Star Atlas_ as Bidelman's Helium Variable (around 14h24m and something like -39-o declination, as I recall), also V761 Centauri if my information is correct. It turned out that one of the stars of the Lupus trapezoid was around 149 light years distant -- so that the light I was seeing would have left around 1859, the year of John Brown's raid at Harper's Ferry in the USA to free the slaves, and also of Darwin's _Origin of Species_. At 0117, I spotted Alpha Lupi, like Zeta Centauri at around -47-o, about the same as NGC 5139. Of course, again, I reflected from much experience that being able to observe a bright point source does not necessarily mean that extended objects, even bright ones, will be equally visible under urban conditions rueful grin! At 0213, as the Earth rotated and the stars thus appeared to progress in a stately promenade, a familiar landmark appeared: the "Pentagon" formed by Antares, Rho Ophiuchi, and some other stars in that region, a pattern which might almost seem to serve as a shared "capital" of two constellations, Ophiuchus and Scorpius. At that point the local sidereal time (LST) was about 1534 (based on an LST at midnight PDT of about 1321), and Antares is at about 16h29m. That tells me that I was about to see Antares almost an hour before its transit of the meridean, at an hour angle (HA) of about -0h55m, a useful guide for the future. At 0230, from the catbird seat, I saw a new favorite object: NGC 6231, the "Scorpius Jewel Box" or "Northern Jewel Box" of the southern skies, not to be confused with another "Jewel Box" looked further south in Crux. This is located around 16h54m at -42-o, and is a bright open cluster about 15' across which comes through well even in bright urban skies at around 10-o above the horizon. While it isn't on Messier's list from the simple reason it doesn't make it above the horizon if one is observing from the region of Paris, Hodierna does describe it in 1654, having had the benefit of a more southernly Italian venue. This makes it a real gem of early DSO history, as well as a sheer visual delight. At 0246 I thought that I might have observed, moving back north to the pentagon, M4. Was I seeing it, or simply visualizing it where I wanted it to be, located below and not too far from midway between Antares and another star forming the base of the asterism? On repeated attempts with various uses of direct or averted vision, it seem at times to be a distinct "smudge" of light -- could 70mm aperture plus binocular vision achieve this under urban conditions when with the Dob I had not discerned anything clearly. Then again, curiously, I had noted that M22 was about as easy to spot in these binoculars as it seemed in the Dob the first time I saw it. It also looked for M80, at wasn't sure if I saw it, but at any rate learned about where to find it -- helpful for darker skies also. At 0319, a moment of delight as I found the first Messier object I had sought out and observed as such: M7, not quite a year ago! There it was; if I view it from the catbird seat, it seems comparatively a "northern" object by comparison to something like NGC 6231. At not quite -35-o, M7 is the southernmost Messier, and a beautiful open cluster it is. It's too low a declination to see with the Dob from my observatory, but with the binoculars it's easy. A few minutes later I looked again at the M4 region, and concluded that the smudge I seemed to see "looked credible." Making a sketch of an object definitely seen along with surrounding asterisms and the like, and then determining what it is, is generally just a matter and patience and access to the right resources; but deciding if one has actually _seen_ something at a well-known location is a different kind of puzzle. My guess is that I actually saw M4, at least some of the time -- but that maybe the best thing would be to practice my averted vision more, which might either confirm or possibly tend to disprove my problematic "sighting." At 0348 (around 1709 LST) I got another view of M7, and this time also found and enjoyed M6. By 0358 I had also spotted M8 and M20 (or more precisely their prominent open clusters), as well as M24, the Small Sagittarius Star Cloud. At around 0402, I concluded with M25 (an open cluster very distinct and with lots of framing in a 4.3-o FOV) and M22, a globular cluster which comes through very clearly. What's hard to describe in words is the total experience: the slow progression of the stars, and the alternation between purposeful and sometimes even hurried searches for specific DSO's or other objects of interest, and the more relaxed periods of simply enjoying a pleasant asterism or even a randomly selected starfield: "Thus engagingly crowded region may not constitute a DSO, but it's no less agreeable to the eye." Also, I find myself starting to learn about things like stellar "associations" -- maybe enlarging a bit the usual concept of a DSO. Anyway, that's the story of a night at the time of year when the summer approaches, with Scorpius and Sagittarius as its welcome celestial harbingers. Most appreciatively, Margo Schulter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constellations and the Zodiac | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 13 | August 19th 05 11:19 PM |
Constellations | Phil Hawkins | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | February 3rd 05 06:32 PM |
Drawing constellations? | Wolfram Sang | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | June 18th 04 06:44 AM |
Constellations | Orions Belt | Amateur Astronomy | 28 | April 6th 04 10:58 PM |
List of Constellations | gooup | Misc | 0 | November 10th 03 01:58 PM |