![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Venus has a very large metal core(iron + Nickel) yet it has a very weak
magnetic field. That begs the question WHY? My first answer is its slow rotation(only once around in over 243 earth days) Next answer for little magnetizim is those two metal are not revolving around each other. Third reason could be its very hot thick atmosphere destroys its south to north flowing magnetic field. I can easily picture Venus as having a flat surface even with its great volcanic activity. Mountains eroded down. This could help slow Venus's rotation. Best to keep in mind Venus is hotter than Mercury. Mercury has no atmosphere and Venus has to much atmosphere Go figure Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Venus has a very large metal core(iron + Nickel) yet it has a very weak magnetic field. That begs the question WHY? My first answer is its slow rotation(only once around in over 243 earth days) Next answer for little magnetizim is those two metal are not revolving around each other. Third reason could be its very hot thick atmosphere destroys its south to north flowing magnetic field. I can easily picture Venus as having a flat surface even with its great volcanic activity. Mountains eroded down. This could help slow Venus's rotation. Best to keep in mind Venus is hotter than Mercury. Mercury has no atmosphere and Venus has to much atmosphere Go figure Bert Venus has a very newish and active core, of one that's cooling itself off at the gradual but impressive surface rate of losing 20.5 w/m2. There's no way Venus is as old as Earth or Mercury, not to mention the dead geothermal aspects of Mars being older than Earth. .. - Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 7:21 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Venus has a very large metal core(iron + Nickel) yet it has a very weak magnetic field. That begs the question WHY? My first answer is its slow rotation(only once around in over 243 earth days) Next answer for little magnetizim is those two metal are not revolving around each other. Third reason could be its very hot thick atmosphere destroys its south to north flowing magnetic field. I can easily picture Venus as having a flat surface even with its great volcanic activity. Mountains eroded down. This could help slow Venus's rotation. Best to keep in mind Venus is hotter than Mercury. Mercury has no atmosphere and Venus has to much atmosphere Go figure Bert Being that a somewhat newish core of Venus isn't likely to allow a magnetic field to set in, and the fact that it no longer has a massive moon in nearby orbit, are each good enough reasons as to why there's hardly any magnetosphere to speak of. The slow rotation is certainly another good enough cause to have kept Venus from developing its magnetosphere. How about we use all of the above. I believe Venus has a newish and fairly active core, of one that's cooling itself off at the gradual but impressive surface rate of losing 20.5 w/m2, and there's even reasonable science to back that up. There's no way Venus is every bit as old as Earth or Mercury, not to mention the dead geothermal aspects of Mars as likely being at least somewhat older than Earth. Of course, the mainstream Gods will always insist that absolutely everything has to be of the exact same age, within +/- a second or so. .. - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about nothing other than atmospheric braking causing the slow
rotation of Venus, Brad? lmao! Your wacko theories are not needed. Saul Levy On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:21:28 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth wrote: Being that a somewhat newish core of Venus isn't likely to allow a magnetic field to set in, and the fact that it no longer has a massive moon in nearby orbit, are each good enough reasons as to why there's hardly any magnetosphere to speak of. The slow rotation is certainly another good enough cause to have kept Venus from developing its magnetosphere. How about we use all of the above. I believe Venus has a newish and fairly active core, of one that's cooling itself off at the gradual but impressive surface rate of losing 20.5 w/m2, and there's even reasonable science to back that up. There's no way Venus is every bit as old as Earth or Mercury, not to mention the dead geothermal aspects of Mars as likely being at least somewhat older than Earth. Of course, the mainstream Gods will always insist that absolutely everything has to be of the exact same age, within +/- a second or so. . - Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 7:21 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Venus has a very large metal core(iron + Nickel) yet it has a very weak magnetic field. That begs the question WHY? My first answer is its slow rotation(only once around in over 243 earth days) Next answer for little magnetizim is those two metal are not revolving around each other. Third reason could be its very hot thick atmosphere destroys its south to north flowing magnetic field. I can easily picture Venus as having a flat surface even with its great volcanic activity. Mountains eroded down. This could help slow Venus's rotation. Best to keep in mind Venus is hotter than Mercury. Mercury has no atmosphere and Venus has to much atmosphere Go figure Bert Where did you go? Just because our very own Semitic minion Saul Levy shows up is not to worry, because there's still an honest light at the end of this tunnel about the planet Venus and of it's extremely active and thus newish metal core, much like Earth's core that has to contain some if not a great deal of thorium. BTW, the internal fluid friction of Venus is perhaps of a far greater tidal locking consideration, rather than it's thick and robust atmosphere that's only in a slightly retrograde motion near the surface. .. - Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More of your BULL****, BradGoofBall! lmfjao!
Keep trying to make some sense here! lmao! Saul Levy On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:21:28 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth wrote: Just because our very own Semitic minion Saul Levy shows up is not to worry, because there's still an honest light at the end of this tunnel about the planet Venus and of it's extremely active and thus newish metal core, much like Earth's core that has to contain some if not a great deal of thorium. BTW, the internal fluid friction of Venus is perhaps of a far greater tidal locking consideration, rather than it's thick and robust atmosphere that's only in a slightly retrograde motion near the surface. . - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Venus's very Slow Rotation My Theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | June 25th 06 09:38 PM |
Venus's very Slow Rotation My Theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | June 25th 06 08:55 PM |
Venus's very Slow Rotation My Theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 3 | June 25th 06 02:57 AM |
Earth's Rotation slow-down not proven... | Larry Wilson | UK Astronomy | 0 | January 11th 06 08:11 PM |
Field de-rotation software | Chuck | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | February 28th 04 11:42 PM |