![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:02:03 -0400, nathan jones wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I would agree that the hotspot in '5903 and '5902 could have been produced as you describe but for one thing. The LM lunar surface probes attached to the landing pads indicate the true last moments trajectory path taken by the LM and if you look at AS11-40-5915 among others you can see the orientation of 3 probes and the direction in which they are bent and a couple of instances see the line in the ground/dirt in which it was dragged as the Eagle landed. These do not correspond with the positioning of the hotspot and the fluid errosion given that the engine continued to fire untill just after it set down. It looks more as if the LM was dropped in position onto an already prepared ground made to look like it landed under rocket power but unfortunately whilst dropping the Eagle it wasn't accurately lined up with the pre-made rocket mess on the ground. No actual Moon landing implies floodlighting was used on a moon "set". Regarding the "Hadley" images 10075741.jpg and 10075742.jpg Anyone may examine them and try rotating them as you described and as for radiant heat I think I studied it well enough at university. You'll see, the improved section regarding this will be clearer. *PLONK* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Space: 1999" Eagle: Realistic? | Chuck Stewart | Technology | 0 | July 12th 04 07:20 AM |