antagonist's digest, volume 2452854

On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:38:55 GMT, tholen tholed:

dizzy writes:

432 *blush* Awww, shucks. You're too kind.

Note: No response.

432 I know it's too early for an acceptance speech, but I would like to
432 note some of my illustrious colleague's achievements.

Note: No response.

432 Cypherpunk, for some pretty funny trolls.

Note: No response.

432 Zwar, the newcomer who put forth an impressive effort in his
432 (inevitably) futile attempt to convince tholen that he was being
432 unfair.

Note: No response.

432 Carrie, for her wide-eyed innocence. She reminded us all of the shock
432 of first encountering tholen.

Note: No response.

432 Penso, for some of the most creative and on-target of the tholen
432 slams.

Note: No response.

432 And last, but certainly not least, the old guard. Fields, Wehrung,
432 Kolle, Porter, Beck, Daniels and Grantco. (Sorry if I missed
432 someone.) These guys have been in the trenches for years, performing
432 the thankless job of pointing-out tholen's hypocrisy, illogic, and
432 antagonism. We owe them all a round of applause.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, dizzy?
Indeed, what does any of that have to do with astronomy? After
all, you did add sci.astro to the distribution.

Answer my questions first, tholen.

433 How does my merely re-posting *your* response to Carrie, at her
433 request, allegedly constitute "antagonism", tholen? Classic
433 dishonesty.

Note: No response.

433 Some classical music is very weird, just like you, tholen.

Note: No response.

434 You're stuffing the ballot box, you cheat!

What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music, dizzy?

How ironic.