![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
If Microsoft will succeed to buy Yahoo, its founders should earn $4 billion cash, so, could they use that money to start (also) a New.Space company? http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/024yahoospace.html .. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 4:57 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. If Microsoft will succeed to buy Yahoo, its founders should earn $4 billion cash, so, could they use that money to start (also) a New.Space company? http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/024yahoospace.html Of course they could, but more than likely it'll be within China or at least India where they'll get at least 10:1 for their tax avoidance offshore protected loot. .. - Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 7:57 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. If Microsoft will succeed to buy Yahoo, its founders should earn $4 billion cash, so, could they use that money to start (also) a New.Space company? http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/024yahoospace.html What is the point? Anyone could their money to start a New.Space company. There is nothing special about this transaction that has anything to do with space Also you are spreading your bull**** again. 1. NASA can't be "sold", it is a gov't agency 2. The assets are worth more than 4 billion 3 No one can start a "NASA" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Feb, 03:13, wrote:
What is the point? *Anyone could their money to start a New.Space company. *There is nothing special about this transaction that has anything to do with space just read the article... I ...suggest them to do that 1. *NASA can't be "sold", it is a gov't agency in the world, there was, are and will be plenty of public assets privatized 2. The assets are worth more than 4 billion the NASA "assets" that have an high value are the BRAINS of its engineers and scientists the buildings & hardware assets (VAB, research centers, launch pads, etc.) have a value that's (probably) under $500M 3 *No one can start a "NASA" I means a company similar to NASA and able to do bigger things than SpaceX & C.(not "exactly" another NASA) . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 2:17 am, gaetanomarano wrote:
On 10 Feb, 03:13, wrote: What is the point? Anyone could their money to start a New.Space company. There is nothing special about this transaction that has anything to do with space just read the article... I ...suggest them to do that 1. NASA can't be "sold", it is a gov't agency in the world, there was, are and will be plenty of public assets privatized 2. The assets are worth more than 4 billion the NASA "assets" that have an high value are the BRAINS of its engineers and scientists And they work for the gov't, they can't be privatized the buildings & hardware assets (VAB, research centers, launch pads, etc.) have a value that's (probably) under $500M Way too low, more like 10's of billions. A single crawler is worth more |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Feb, 16:39, wrote:
Way too low, more like 10's of billions. *A single crawler is worth more you confuse "COSTS" with "VALUE"... ![]() costs each) Shuttle when retired... ![]() . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 10:43 am, gaetanomarano wrote:
On 10 Feb, 16:39, wrote: Way too low, more like 10's of billions. A single crawler is worth more you confuse "COSTS" with "VALUE"... ![]() costs each) Shuttle when retired... ![]() You have no concept of anything. Just the land NASA owns it is in the billions. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 3:26 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote: :On Feb 10, 2:17 am, gaetanomarano wrote: : : the buildings & hardware assets (VAB, research centers, launch pads, : etc.) have a value that's (probably) under $500M : : :Way too low, more like 10's of billions. A single crawler is worth :more : To whom? Nobody sane uses 'replacement cost' to determine what something is worth. -- Silicon valley, Florida beach front, Chesapeake bay all prime real estate |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 6:13 pm, wrote:
On Feb 9, 7:57 pm, gaetanomarano wrote: . If Microsoft will succeed to buy Yahoo, its founders should earn $4 billion cash, so, could they use that money to start (also) a New.Space company? http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/024yahoospace.html What is the point? Anyone could their money to start a New.Space company. There is nothing special about this transaction that has anything to do with space Also you are spreading your bull**** again. 1. NASA can't be "sold", it is a gov't agency 2. The assets are worth more than 4 billion 3 No one can start a "NASA" China already offers CATS, and they seem reliable. So, who the hell needs our spendy, time consuming and not always reliable NASA? .. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canadian company got Hitlers UFO's, but then? A.V. Roe company | Keith Willshaw | Space Shuttle | 4 | January 10th 08 01:27 AM |
SAA's Founders | Ed T | Amateur Astronomy | 55 | January 18th 06 09:30 PM |
could a toy company save space exploitation? | blart | Policy | 0 | November 9th 05 11:00 AM |
The Boeing Company Air and Space Exhibit Opens to the Public | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | May 31st 05 09:49 PM |
Kerry Space Group on Yahoo | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 3 | February 23rd 04 10:05 PM |