![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.... spaceflight by the US program has more to do with our militaristic
tendance than using tried and true, or even good technology. Without a large consumer of solid rocket propellent, the plant producing it would shut down. Extending the time to reproduce the production facilities, and a whole category of weapons that depend on large supply of propellent. The US should just build the most modern propellent plant we can, then mothball it. So that NASA and our space program can move on to better things than preparing for War. Personally, I think it's time to get NASA out of the Launch/Landing business and back into developing new technologies. The ones that haven't been tried and aren't true yet. Building a mothballed propellent plant would satisfy the demands of the military to "feel" secure, and free NASA from this requirement. Just my opinion. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Worry over SRBs | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 28 | August 4th 06 01:38 AM |
Old SRBs | Mark Lopa | Space Shuttle | 4 | June 10th 05 08:13 PM |
ET mated to SRBs for STS-114 | Jon S. Berndt | Space Shuttle | 0 | March 2nd 05 04:30 AM |
Atlas SRBs | LooseChanj | Space Science Misc | 17 | February 27th 04 12:03 AM |
How Many "Hot" SRBs on Mission 51-L? | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 1 | September 11th 03 11:57 PM |