Ron Paul, Wins another Republican Debate

Well, the Primaries are actually underway, not much has changed, Ron Paul
wins another debate. It's easy to see why.

New Media (Internet) vs Old Media (TVnews & Print)
http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+p... e=ytd&sort=0
Notice anything wrong with the Old Media, or the New Media, which every way
you want to look at it.

New vs Old Media for the Democrats looks reasonable
http://www.google.com/trends?q=hilla...e=ytd& sort=0
....Maybe the Old Media just wants to make sure the Republicans pick an
unpopular candidate...who has no real support...in the new world. That way
Hillary might actually win.

Debate times for the candidates,

Romney: 21:11, during 13 times
McCain: 16:00, during 13 times
Giuliani: 13:50, during 11 times
Huckabee: 12:11, during nine times
Paul: 6:31, during six times

Looks like Mitt Romney is the Old Media candidate of choice, he had way too
much time in the debate. So much so, that Mitt had to be prompted before
answering questions:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archi...24/607191.aspx
But, you can't read the news on MSNBC, they like to make it up as they go
along. Here is a copy of what was news on MSNBC. It's still available on
the New Media, Iternet.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2316/...5b6c0fe6_o.jpg
Or, watch the video;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NlIMQ31EjY
For a bit of commentary on the remark
http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2...ar-puppet.html
Brings back memories of Bush's lumpy back problem. Looks like MSNBC doesn't
have a problem with Mitt Romney being prompted during the debate.

Looks like John McCain also had too much time. They never should have let
Dr. Paul ask him any question, as McCain showed his ignorance about the
current president is doing. McCain does live in Washington, doesn't he?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPm8ptvIMPs
.... seems McCain would have the same people...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPm8ptvIMPs
.... probably not news at MSNBC either, maybe McCain needs to hire Romney's
debate prompter.

--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

Craig Fink wrote:

Well, the Primaries are actually underway, not much has changed, Ron Paul
wins another debate. It's easy to see why.

Sure it is, 45% of Americans are creationists, just like Ron Paul.

kT wrote:

Craig Fink wrote:

Well, the Primaries are actually underway, not much has changed, Ron Paul
wins another debate. It's easy to see why.

Sure it is, 45% of Americans are creationists, just like Ron Paul.


Not sure where you get this, why don't you spoon feed me with a http://

I haven't heard Ron Paul say that he is or is not creationist.
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

Craig Fink wrote:
kT wrote:

Craig Fink wrote:

Well, the Primaries are actually underway, not much has changed, Ron Paul
wins another debate. It's easy to see why.
Sure it is, 45% of Americans are creationists, just like Ron Paul.


Not sure where you get this, why don't you spoon feed me with a http://

I haven't heard Ron Paul say that he is or is not creationist.

He did say it, and he is a creationist.

http://godbegone.blogspot.com/2007/1...ist-moron.html

http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=2571

The web is replete with evidence of Ron Paul's bizarre views on science.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22830366/
Poll, 52,000 votes cast of people who were inspired enough to vote.

Who stood out from the pack?
Ron Paul 52%
Mitt Romney 25%
Others 23%

Who showed the most leadership qualities?
Ron Paul 49%
Mitt Romney 25%
John McCain 14%
Other 12%

Who was the most convincing candidate?
Ron Paul 51%
Mitt Romney 24%
Other 25%

Who had the most rehearsed answers?
Mitt Romney 42%
John McCain 24%
Rudy Giuliani 17%
Other 17%

Who avoided the questions?
John McCain 38%
Rudy Giuliani 24%
Mitt Romney 20%
Other 18%

Who had the best one-liner?
Ron Paul 38%
Mike Huckabee 25%
Mitt Romney 22%

Well, to be truthful, Ron Paul didn't win all categories of the online poll.
Mitt and John did well in two of them.

Text message Poll on MSNBC,
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=642_1201265385
Paul 42%
Romney 40%
Other 18%

The choice seems obvious if the Republicans want to win in November.

Einar wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/


Look at the delegates each has received.

Romney 59

Huckabee 40

McCain 36


Paul 6

Giuliani 1

Louisiana caucus results are still in limbo, I've got to hand it too those
Cajuns, they sure do thing differently there.

Opinions may vary, feel free to fix the others.

Einar wrote:

On Jan 26, 6:52 pm, Craig Fink wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22830366/
Poll, 52,000 votes cast of people who were inspired enough to vote.

Who stood out from the pack?
Ron Paul 52%
Mitt Romney 25%
Others 23%

Who showed the most leadership qualities?
Ron Paul 49%
Mitt Romney 25%
John McCain 14%
Other 12%

Who was the most convincing candidate?
Ron Paul 51%
Mitt Romney 24%
Other 25%

Who had the most rehearsed answers?
Mitt Romney 42%
John McCain 24%
Rudy Giuliani 17%
Other 17%

Who avoided the questions?
John McCain 38%
Rudy Giuliani 24%
Mitt Romney 20%
Other 18%

Who had the best one-liner?
Ron Paul 38%
Mike Huckabee 25%
Mitt Romney 22%

Well, to be truthful, Ron Paul didn't win all categories of the online
poll. Mitt and John did well in two of them.

Text message Poll on MSNBC,http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=642_1201265385
Paul 42%
Romney 40%
Other 18%

The choice seems obvious if the Republicans want to win in November.

Einar wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/



Look at the delegates each has received.

Romney 59

Huckabee 40

McCain 36

Paul 6

Giuliani 1

Louisiana caucus results are still in limbo, I've got to hand it too
those Cajuns, they sure do thing differently there.

Opinions may vary, feel free to fix the others.

Ah, an onLine poll.

Those are very easy to manipulate. Ron Paul´s fans may have organized
a run on that webpage, so to speak, in order so that the poll would
reflect theyr opinions.

In Benton County, Arkansas too?

http://www.nolanchart.com/article1433.html

Ron Paul 36.6%
Mitt Romney 24.6%
Mike Huckabee 21.1 %
John McCain 14%
Rudy Giuliani 2.8%

People who don't have to ask, "Ron Paul Who?", seem to like him. It's just
the majority of ignorant voters, like you, who are still wondering. Try
googling Ron Paul, watch what he has to say. It might surprise you, good
old fashion Republican conservatism, Revolutionary foreign policy (Thomas
Jefferson's in fact), a return to moral and Christian ethics, with
libertarian principle thrown in. Freedom, Liberty, self-determination for
all, including Iraq.

It really amazes me just how little real "hard core" support Mitt, Mike,
John and Rudy have. It's mediocre support at best, this for that support.

Republicans should really be asking why the liberal media supports Mitt,
John, Mike and Rudy. It's probably because Hillary is a shoe in with this
crowd.
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

A litle search on Ron:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_paul
Yes, nice web page, explains why I like Ron Paul. I like Wikipedia, it does
mention that he is a Constitutionalist? Doesn't it. I'm afraid that I
couldn't vote for anyone who isn't a Constitutionalist.

Is McCain a Constitutionalist?

Einar wrote:

On Jan 26, 8:33 pm, Craig Fink wrote:
Einar wrote:
On Jan 26, 6:52 pm, Craig Fink wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22830366/
Poll, 52,000 votes cast of people who were inspired enough to vote.

Who stood out from the pack?
Ron Paul 52%
Mitt Romney 25%
Others 23%

Who showed the most leadership qualities?
Ron Paul 49%
Mitt Romney 25%
John McCain 14%
Other 12%

Who was the most convincing candidate?
Ron Paul 51%
Mitt Romney 24%
Other 25%

Who had the most rehearsed answers?
Mitt Romney 42%
John McCain 24%
Rudy Giuliani 17%
Other 17%

Who avoided the questions?
John McCain 38%
Rudy Giuliani 24%
Mitt Romney 20%
Other 18%

Who had the best one-liner?
Ron Paul 38%
Mike Huckabee 25%
Mitt Romney 22%

Well, to be truthful, Ron Paul didn't win all categories of the online
poll. Mitt and John did well in two of them.

Text message Poll on
MSNBC,http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=642_1201265385 Paul 42%
Romney 40%
Other 18%

The choice seems obvious if the Republicans want to win in November.

Einar wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/

Look at the delegates each has received.

Romney 59

Huckabee 40

McCain 36

Paul 6

Giuliani 1

Louisiana caucus results are still in limbo, I've got to hand it too
those Cajuns, they sure do thing differently there.

Opinions may vary, feel free to fix the others.

Ah, an onLine poll.

Those are very easy to manipulate. Ron Paul´s fans may have organized
a run on that webpage, so to speak, in order so that the poll would
reflect theyr opinions.

In Benton County, Arkansas too?

http://www.nolanchart.com/article1433.html

Ron Paul 36.6%
Mitt Romney 24.6%
Mike Huckabee 21.1 %
John McCain 14%
Rudy Giuliani 2.8%

People who don't have to ask, "Ron Paul Who?", seem to like him. It's
just the majority of ignorant voters, like you, who are still wondering.
Try googling Ron Paul, watch what he has to say. It might surprise you,
good old fashion Republican conservatism, Revolutionary foreign policy
(Thomas Jefferson's in fact), a return to moral and Christian ethics,
with libertarian principle thrown in. Freedom, Liberty,
self-determination for all, including Iraq.

It really amazes me just how little real "hard core" support Mitt, Mike,
John and Rudy have. It's mediocre support at best, this for that support.

Republicans should really be asking why the liberal media supports Mitt,
John, Mike and Rudy. It's probably because Hillary is a shoe in with this
crowd.
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

Ehem, in my humble opinion many of his ideas are downright silly,
basigly going from bad to vorse than bad.

My preferred candidate is John McCain.

A litle search on Ron:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_paul

I don´t doubt he was an excellent surgeon, but he absolutely sucks as
a politician I think if his ideas are the judge of those qualites.

Einar

--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

Eric Chomko wrote:
Republicans have loved wars as good for business and patriotism at
least as long as Truman
has been president maybe longer.

You do realize that Truman was a Democrat, right??

Neocons were created out of ashes of the Nixon administration. Cheney,
Bush Sr., Rumsfeld, Armitage, Perle.
They got Reagan into the White House.

Suggest you read a little about the Scoop Jackson
crew....the neocons switch parties like Imelda Marcos
changed shoes.

JCrowe used a stick in the sand to babble
Eric Chomko wrote:
Republicans have loved wars as good for business and patriotism at
least as long as Truman
has been president maybe longer.

You do realize that Truman was a Democrat, right??

And that he introduced a national health care plan in 1947?

Swill

Governor Swill wrote:

JCrowe used a stick in the sand to babble
Eric Chomko wrote:
Republicans have loved wars as good for business and patriotism at
least as long as Truman
has been president maybe longer.

You do realize that Truman was a Democrat, right??

And that he introduced a national health care plan in 1947?

What did Kennedy do?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIum0o-_LZk

--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @