![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Human space travel is a big source of profits for aerospace companies.
The advantages are that the scientific returns are very low or zero, so there is no need to spend money paying scientists to gather and understand data, all the profits go in building hardware that is used for a few days/weeks and the thrown away. In the ISS, for instance, billions have been paid to aerospace industries for hardware that has produced not a single intersting scientific result, and that has dwarfed the budget of science within NASA. Take for instance a mission like the Mars Rovers. After four years in Mars, those machines are still working perfectly, returning scientific data and allowing the exploration of Mars in an unprecedented scale. The total budget of the Mars rovers was around 900 million, and it has returned gigabytes of data, measurements, photographs, etc. This is more or less what a single trip of the space shuttle costs. In this group, one of the most vocal advocates of this "humans into space and to hell with science" is Mr McCall, that will not hesitate to insult anyone disagreeing with his views. Mostly his arguments are just at the level of "bull ****" or "stupid". Personally I do not care, but facts are stubborn. Human presence in space is unnecessary, even more so in the moon. The basic groundwork is not there, in terms of working life support systems that can stay in space for 4 years without any failure. It can be argued that astronauts can "fix" a life support system, and this is partially true, but it depends heavily on the type of failu to repair a life support system you need a life support system that keeps you alive. There is an emergency escape frm the ISS. That choice is not available halfway from the distance to Mars. This is a basic UNSOLVED problem. Space radiation is another, completely unsolved one. The experience of the ISS is of no use since the earth magnetic field protects the ISS, a protection that people in the way to Mars will not have. This is another UNSOLVED problem. Gravity effects (or rather its absence) is another problem. We just do not know since we have no data about the long term effects on the body of 2 years without gravity. It is a fact that exercise and countermeasures do NOT work, and there is a continuous bone mass loss in space. This is another UNSOLVED problem. You can say that "artificial gravity" etc, but the problems to solve to put that to work are quite big. Another unsolved problem is how to land in Mars, what is a very difficult problem that is very complex to solve for small mass vehicles and completely unknown for huge mass vehicles like a spaceship with 4 people and its life support, supposing the 2-3 years supplies are previously sent to Mars by robots. This host of problems (all of them unsolved) makes any proposition for manned Mars missions just a waste of money. All of this problems CAN be solved, and (I am sure) they WILL be solved, but not before this century has finished. A new society is needed to give the drive to go into space. A society that cares about exploration and that is ready to pay make the effort it will take to develop a life-support system that can take us to the stars. Before that life support system is there, all the things being done here are just pipe dreams. -- jacob navia jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr logiciels/informatique http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Travel by Humans is Possible | Quadibloc | Policy | 95 | January 29th 08 04:03 PM |
How can humans advance towards a permanent and practical manned precence in space? | [email protected] | Policy | 73 | July 13th 07 12:47 AM |
Hawking Says Humans Must Go Into Space | Jim Oberg | Policy | 16 | June 19th 06 04:12 PM |
44 years of humans in space | Bill | History | 31 | May 5th 05 01:16 PM |
Value of Humans in Space | Tony Flanders | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | April 14th 04 08:41 PM |