![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our Sun is 4.57 billion years old, so if the big bang brought Suns 13
billion years ago, there may be species 8.5 billion years old. And yet no signs of any intelligent radio signals from any star. One thing I realized, we are not the oldest, newest, firstest necessarily. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear gb:
On Jan 7, 2:20*am, gb wrote: Our Sun is 4.57 billion years old, so if the big bang brought Suns 13 billion years ago, there may be species 8.5 billion years old. Small issue, not too much "biological order" is going to arise if the CMBR has not yet redshifted to below 350 K or so. So maybe 8 billion years.. And yet no signs of any intelligent radio signals from any star. What if they use cable, to prevent waste of energy? What if they use digital, with very high data compression, and hyperbolic antennas? What we would get would be entirely random noise (if no carrier was used). How long can you talk to a one-second old child without growing bored? To follow your analogy of 8 billion years to ~1 million years. One thing I realized, we are not the oldest, newest, firstest necessarily. I hope we are not the wisest yet. David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gb wrote:
Our Sun is 4.57 billion years old, so if the big bang brought Suns 13 billion years ago, there may be species 8.5 billion years old. Unlikely, unless they are not carbon or silicon-based lifeforms. The process of creating heavier atoms such as carbon, iron, oxygen and nuclear fissionable materials practically requires the life cycle of stars going supernova and "seeding the field", a process that in itself could take many billions of years. Under the Rare Earth hypothesis (which granted only covers "life as we know it" - but still have ultimately valid points) many of the features that make life possible require heavier elements which help provide life with defense from cosmic radiation, stellar radiation, and provide the basic building blocks of carbon- or silicon-based life. And yet no signs of any intelligent radio signals from any star. This, of course, assumes that intelligent life elsewhere uses radio based communications, and ones strong enough to reach us without significant decay to boot. Furthermore, I have yet to hear many good, rational definitions for what "intelligent life" actually is, many groups just define it as "capable of communicating with us" which I think has nothing to do with intelligence. We are very likely alone in our galaxy, though the odds of intelligent life in other galaxies is quite probable, and while they may even be ahead of us technologically in other galaxies (possibly colonizing their galaxy), bridging the void between is a larger challenge. One thing I realized, we are not the oldest, newest, firstest necessarily. Not necessarily, no. But we have a long ways to go before we can verify that, it would seem. - Timothy Partee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quasar found 13 billion years away | [email protected] | Research | 3 | June 23rd 07 10:07 PM |
Quasar found 13 billion years away | Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply | Research | 0 | June 9th 07 09:41 AM |
Humanity could live for 5 billion years but will likely go extinct in the next 100,000 years ultimate Renewables and when Economics and humanity die out | a_plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 26th 06 09:36 AM |
How can we see anything from 13 billion light years away? | N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) | Astronomy Misc | 13 | March 16th 04 06:01 PM |
oldest planet 13 billion years old in M-4 | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 14th 03 06:22 PM |