The Boxed Thinking of Joining Polarized Parties Can't Win Elections -Only Results Can

No conditional bureaucracy can reply to this statement,
because no conditional bureaucracy WAS right for the
polarized faction that this nation has become: One faction
expects everything to be given to them by the State, and
the second one says that the perception of America worldwide
is that we've just shot ourselves in the foot moneywise.

Who's right? (The problem is both factions are only partly
right). The first faction is right in the sense that the
types of industries that we've exported worldwide should no
longer be competitive, because not only has the moderni-
zation of skills and trades necessary to make these con-
structions quickly become available, but the market has
become so saturated with eligible prospects that there are
large groups of unemployed but skilled and talented people
available. For this reason, and this reason primarily, the
construction market should no longer be as competitive as
it was, but should also be marshalled in the direction of
job retraining for more complex projects. So what ARE some
of these newer projects?

The identification of transferable skill sets within and
between industries related to the automotive, mass
transit, and transportation infrastructure have all
been affected.

Think of the concrete-and-mortar economies of of these
"internationalist" mass transit technologies, as well as
infrastructures and commercialism, which must revalidate
their own existence by retrenching their effort abroad in
order to ward off long-term substitution of their outdated
technology, when it should be, more realistically, a
*new world free market economy*.

We should be instinctively expecting that a more advanced
technology (i.e., 'yankee ingenuity') has arrived with
great enthusiasm - without these so-called "burdens"
on society that we see with "pork barrel projects" and
the like.

Yeah, we are helping third world countries establish them-
selves colonially, but at the same time, we are inadver-
tantly "overbureaucratizing" with the weight falling on
private enterprise: i.e., the lowering of standards
through the awarding of contracts to please peers, with
the strain of excitement going into getting the next
grant ("conditional" NOW and from mostly the state and
military industrial complex - something that Eisenhower
continued to warn us about) and worrying about the
'right' personnel (multi-ethnic), not to mention the
mire of standards, eligibility requirements, human rights
waivers, tort law through conflict of interest (between
private industry and the bureaucracy), invasion of privacy
(stolen patented technology), and lately a huge money
grab for more pork barrel supply of federal reserve notes!

It all seems so senseless in contrast to what a truly
modernistic society, sort of one like the up-and-coming
Malaysian empire, who at last count, was spurning Wall
Street with CIMB's IPOs" - CIMB = Commerce International
Merchant Bankers Group, Malaysia's largest investment
bank consisting of Islamic bonds and financial services,
representing a huge growth in electronics industries.

So where does that leave the U.S.? Did anyone mention
'energy puppet'? In contrast to the rest of the world,
that's just a little to 'colonial' for yankee ingenuity
to stay alive. We must now ask ourselves - Where are
we going as a nation with all this energy? Recognizing
first, expandability, then within that expandibility,
an expanded airspace to include the first 20 miles
altitude of airspace.

Given the technology that exists today with flight con-
trollers, there could be continuous monitoring of all air
traffic within a 100 mile radius of metropolitan areas,
with each passenger vehicle having its own unique RF tag
for input to the flight controller. Any non-RF tagged
vehicle would be flagged and tracked via local radar,
and intercepted by the local authorities. This would
eliminate all contemporary concrete and highway infra-
structure, so that the money could be re-ear-marked for
earth-to-orbit technologies.

After all, isn't the planet becoming incapable of simul-
taneously supporting all of humanity with the old type
of "oil modernization' indefinitely?

Yes, there are other "earths" out there. Just look at
all the G2V spectral class stars in the galaxy and you'll
get a pretty good idea that there is a good possibility
that within every 70 parsec radius from our own sun,
there may be planets similar to our own. (This study was
done by the British Interplanetary Society back around
1976). Anyone who has been keeping up with propulsion
technology can see that we now have the capability for
FTL transportation. It's the dumbing down technologies
that hinder the spirit of entrepreneurialism in
this area, and lately, there's been a lot of that
going on.

American