![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In years past there has been lots of discussion here about the view
that human spaceflight was funded primarily in the interest of national defense because of the role that these rockets played as ICBM booster demonstrations (a form of power projection). The vocal majority of this forum has staunchly rejected that view, but for those with an open mind here is a quote that I happened on today. It talks about the FOBS system with a quote from Khrushchev with an understanding that the ability to do a precise deorbit of a cosmonaut from orbit directly translated to a military capability to deorbit a nuke warhead on a South Pole trajectory that avoided DEWS/BMEWS/ PineTreeLine detection. Here's the excerpt: (From http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/wo...ssia/r-36o.htm) ======= In the early 1960s, the Soviets needed a way to overcome the forward base advantage held by the west. The west had forward bases in Turkey, Europe, and Asia from which shorter range missiles and bombers could attack the USSR. Following the failure of placing missiles to Cuba, the Soviets turned to technology to overcome the lack of forward positioning. The Vostok launches had previously demonstrated that the Soviets possessed the technology necessary to orbit a space vehicle and then land it in a specific target. In this, there was an implicit assumption that nuclear weapons could be placed in orbit and returned to Earth at any time and place. Khrushchev made this suggestion in 1961, but in March 1962, as part of the rhetoric preceding the Cuban crisis, he made yet another, more ominous suggestion. "We can launch missiles not only over the North Pole, but in the opposite direction, too... Global rockets can fly from the oceans or other directions where warning facilities cannot be installed. Given global missiles, the warning system in general has lost its importance. Global missiles cannot be spotted in time to prepare any measures against them." This statement was the first hint of a new concept called the fractional orbit bombardment system (FOBS) that had been under development since 1961. The orbital missile 8K69 was initially deployed on 19 November 1968, and the first regiment with the R-36 orbital missiles was put on alert on 25 August 1969. The missile was phased out in January 1983 in compliance with the SALT-2 treaty, which prohibited the deployment of FOBS systems. The R-36O SS-9 variant 3 SCARP with a modified upper stage was equipped with an orbital nose cone, which contained an instrumentation section, a single-chambered liquid propellant retrorocket motor and a nuclear warhead. Western estimates were that the orbital missile carried a one- to three-megaton warhead. Once placed into low-Earth orbit, the ICBM possessed unlimited range and the ability to approach the US from any direction, avoiding US northern-looking detection radars. This type of approach would give little or no warning that a warhead was inbound. The reentry vehicle came down in less than one revolution, hence the "fractional" orbit. ====== ~ CT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lisa Nowak Example for Human Spaceflight End? | ed kyle | Policy | 40 | February 10th 07 11:07 AM |
Lisa Nowak Example for Human Spaceflight End? | Eric Chomko | History | 3 | February 8th 07 12:46 PM |
Talk to Congress About Suborbital Human Spaceflight | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | January 21st 05 10:51 PM |
Human spaceflight and AI | Alexander Sheppard | Policy | 28 | February 20th 04 06:35 PM |
Non-human spaceflight casualties | Andrew Gray | History | 0 | November 2nd 03 12:58 AM |