![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anyone help with following list of questions on the Apollo inertial
navigation systems? I am fascinated by the challenges of inertial navigation faced by Apollo - I've done some reading but so far haven't been able to find the answers to these particular questions. 1. How much of a role did the inertial platform and guidance computer play in navigation to the moon? How much of the navigation was done by ground control and tracking? 2. Was the inertial system powered up continuously from launch through to re-entry? Or was it only powered up to monitor and track the various engine burns during the flight? Presumably once you are on the "right" trajectory, there is nothing to disturb you until you get close to the moon/earth, so you can power the system down until you need it again? 3. Was it necessary to re-set or correct platform alignment during the flight, and if so, how often and how was this done - star shots? 4. With specific reference to the gyro's, how does the accuracy/drift specification of the Apollo gyros compare to that of cheap fibre optic gyros that one can purchase for about US$5k these days? 5. How does the accuracy of the shuttle system compare? If you are not going to the moon, can you get by with lower accuracy? Steve |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
SRG wrote: 1. How much of a role did the inertial platform and guidance computer play in navigation to the moon? How much of the navigation was done by ground control and tracking? The onboard navigation system was originally intended as the primary navigation reference, but in the end it was generally relegated to a backup role, with radio tracking from the ground as primary. The two were systematically tested against each other on Apollo 8: for major maneuvers, the two agreed so closely that it wasn't clear which one was better. 2. Was the inertial system powered up continuously from launch through to re-entry? Or was it only powered up to monitor and track the various engine burns during the flight? Presumably once you are on the "right" trajectory, there is nothing to disturb you until you get close to the moon/earth, so you can power the system down until you need it again? Original plans envisioned powering it down except for maneuvers and navigation updates, but in the end it was left up all the time. One reason for that was that the wide-field "finder" telescope was plagued by scattered-light problems, so acquiring a good attitude fix starting from scratch was usually difficult and time-consuming. Getting onto the "right" trajectory is harder than you might think. Very small errors in the initial setup grow as time goes by, so mid-course corrections are mandatory. 3. Was it necessary to re-set or correct platform alignment during the flight, and if so, how often and how was this done - star shots? Yes, it was necessary to calibrate out drift, once or twice a day I think, with star sightings. With the platform left running, the accumulated error generally wasn't large and the narrow-field telescope usually sufficed to find the desired star. 4. With specific reference to the gyro's, how does the accuracy/drift specification of the Apollo gyros compare to that of cheap fibre optic gyros that one can purchase for about US$5k these days? Lots better, although I don't have numbers on hand. The cheap fiber gyros are for applications which don't need long-term stability. (They came out of work directed at things like air-to-air missiles, with flight times of a few minutes at the most.) 5. How does the accuracy of the shuttle system compare? If you are not going to the moon, can you get by with lower accuracy? Not really, given applications like astronomical observations (there have been shuttle-based astronomy missions). Again, numbers are not on hand, but my impression is that it's better but not dramatically so. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to rk and Henry Spencer for the useful replies to my posting..
Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have not read the various entries you will find
that the Apollo Flight Journal contains detailed info on practical navigation. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap15fj/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have not read the various entries you will find
that the Apollo Flight Journal contains detailed info on practical navigation. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/ap15fj/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apollo 1 Fire Jokes | Nomen Nescio | Space Shuttle | 5 | January 30th 04 01:18 AM |
If Liberty bells hatch hadnt blown? | Hallerb | History | 28 | August 30th 03 02:57 AM |
Apollo pictures taken from the TV screen | Doug... | History | 0 | August 26th 03 08:30 AM |
The Collins factor | Doug... | History | 27 | August 22nd 03 05:57 PM |
Which Apollo landing site would you revisit? | EAC | History | 2 | July 13th 03 08:26 PM |