![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure if this has anything to do with
the gay astronaut thread. Draw your own conclusions..... http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm90.htm To quote Seinfeld, "Not that there's anything wrong with it..." ;-) - Rusty Barton - Antelope, California -- Rusty Barton - Antelope, California | E-mail - | Visit my Minuteman ICBM website at: | http://www.geocities.com/minuteman_missile | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rusty Barton wrote: I'm not sure if this has anything to do with the gay astronaut thread. Draw your own conclusions..... http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm90.htm From the ad: "The lander was made so that it could be positioned by the command modules (see above left), but was turned around, feet outward, for boarding. The lander provided to be far more versatile than expected." The ad sounds like a translation of something that didn't go quite right. If nothing else, the separation of the LM from the CSM via the LM's descent engine would have been very impressive to see through the CM's windows. Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rusty Barton" wrote in message ... I'm not sure if this has anything to do with the gay astronaut thread. It doesn't. Draw your own conclusions..... Hmm, let's play "how many errors can one find in the description." Starting with One of them remained in the module, maintaining it in earth orbit and providing communication with Mission Command back on Earth. http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm90.htm To quote Seinfeld, "Not that there's anything wrong with it..." ;-) - Rusty Barton - Antelope, California -- Rusty Barton - Antelope, California | E-mail - | Visit my Minuteman ICBM website at: | http://www.geocities.com/minuteman_missile | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From Greg Moo
"Rusty Barton" wrote I'm not sure if this has anything to do with the gay astronaut thread. It doesn't. Perhaps bi-astronauts. "They can be snapped together in either position, easily unsnapped, then snapped into the other position.." Draw your own conclusions..... I took a peek at that website's book offerings. "Spacecraft Docking Kama Sutra" was nowhere to be found. ~ CT |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:06:45 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote: Rusty Barton wrote: I'm not sure if this has anything to do with the gay astronaut thread. Draw your own conclusions..... http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm90.htm From the ad: "The lander was made so that it could be positioned by the command modules (see above left), but was turned around, feet outward, for boarding. The lander provided to be far more versatile than expected." The ad sounds like a translation of something that didn't go quite right. If nothing else, the separation of the LM from the CSM via the LM's descent engine would have been very impressive to see through the CM's windows. "...Ok, Houston, we're giving the LEM it's final checkout...ok, LEM, turn your head and cough!" OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's wrong with L4? | Roy Stogner | Policy | 22 | May 10th 04 03:46 PM |
The wrong approach | Bill Johnston | Policy | 22 | January 28th 04 02:11 PM |
O'keefe says Zubrin's op-ed = 'wrong headed thinking...' | Tom Merkle | Policy | 120 | October 1st 03 07:15 PM |