![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Preamble: When absolute space and absolute time were falsified in the early 20th century, the concept of absolute spacetime scale became very suspect. Note that the source-free equations of general relativity (Einstein's equations) and electromagnetism (Maxwell's equations) are both scale invariant. On the other hand, absolute size scale seemed to be required empirically. After all, galaxies are very big, neutron stars are middle-sized and atomic nuclei are very small. Are they not? Here I will propose a possible resolution to this paradox. Context: If our global spacetime has a new symmetry principle called discrete scale invariance (synonymous with discrete dilation invariance or discrete self-similarity), then the group structure of this global spacetime is the Relativistic Similarity Group (aka the Weyl Group: = Poincare Group + dilation invariance), but it is globally symmetric under *discrete* transformations of scale, as opposed to the more familiar and scale-restricted examples of continuous scale invariance. The physical embodiment of the new discrete symmetry principle would be an infinite hierarchical universe of physical systems manifesting discrete self-similarity. When one observes nature objectively, emphasizing empirical knowledge and treating most theoretical assumptions as open to question, then that is precisely what we appear to have: a discrete hierarchy of self-similar systems (i.e., ...galactic systems, composed of stellar systems, composed of atomic systems, ...). There is considerable evidence for discrete self- similarity among analogues on the different cosmological scales. A veritable cornucopia of observational and theoretical support for this paradigm can be found at www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw . In such a universe, a galaxy could be viewed as a galaxy, a neutron star, or an atomic nucleus depending on the cosmological reference scale chosen by the observer. An empirically-based scientific idea this radical has not come along in a very long time. Absolute scale, beyond the restricted "absolute" scale that applies only *within* individual cosmological scales would be relegated to the dustbin of history. Knecht www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Absolute 0 | Sitav | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | January 14th 07 06:28 AM |
Absolute simultaneity, AT ONCE (except in GR). | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | February 6th 06 08:21 AM |
Absolute simultaneity, AT ONCE (except in GR). | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 6th 06 08:21 AM |
absolute elsewhere | Cuban Segar | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 20th 05 11:21 PM |
Absolute elsewhere | Mike | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 19th 04 10:33 PM |