![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Oct, 03:16, Tom Roberts wrote:
We do not "prove" anything in physics. We test theories. Literally hundreds of experiments confirm SR, and none refute it. Of course Roberts Roberts. How else could it be? After all you, Jean- Marc Levy-Leblond and Jong-Ping Hsu have discovered that special relativity would be unaffected if light in vacuum does travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform and if light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform: http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...34dc146100e32c Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." No experiment can refute a theory that would be unaffected if light in vacuum does travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform and if light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform. Literally no experiment Roberts Roberts. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 06:10 AM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:48 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:09 PM |
When Evidence Contradicts the Scientific Dogma | Mad Scientist | Misc | 1 | August 9th 04 12:16 AM |