![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At last, the image -- or at least one of them -- that I was looking for
regarding the "short CSM" discussion on the "Marooned" thread. Would this: http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/b/bigst80s.jpg from the page http://www.astronautix.com/craft/spaation.htm ....be what you're thinking of? Half-length SM, no SPS, larger RCS tankage, as one poster put it, "...a honking big Soyuz"? Which begs the question, "why have we not developed something similar, which doesn't have to deal with all the fancy winged-vehicle-reentry issues" to do our crew xfer? I guess the new SLI designs using a conical, reminiscent-of-Apollo reentry vehicle is headed that way (except for that Russian-style open-trusswork-with-exposed-tankage equipment module, but I'll bet it's really light). But, anyway...seriously, all proposed actual variants aside, I think that one prop CSM in "Marooned" was built with a short SM anticipating the use of extremely foreshortened forced perspective views when shooting scenes featuring front-view CM exteriors. -- "All over, people changing their roles, along with their overcoats; if Adolf Hitler flew in today, they'd send a limousine anyway!" --the clash. __________________________________________________ _________________ Mike Flugennock, flugennock at sinkers dot org Mike Flugennock's Mikey'zine, dubya dubya dubya dot sinkers dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Marooned" horrific inaccuracies....?! | Mike Flugennock | History | 15 | October 26th 03 04:36 PM |