![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When Copernicus presented the case for axial and orbital motion of the
Earth to the academics of his era,it appears that it took a number of decades for the educational background to emerge where his notions could be discussed openly. The fact is that Newtonian absolute/relative space represents a false approach to and resolution of retrogrades which left a legacy of dilemmas and problems which extended into the horror of the early part of the 20th century - http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AmJPh..75..427N Absolute/relative space based on a hypothetical observer on the Sun viewing planetary motion as a means to resolve retrogrades is an incredible waste of effort and especially now with time lapse footage that clearly,simply and explicitly disproves the statement - " For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct, sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde But from the sun they are always seen direct ," Newton http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...2000_tezel.gif "It is indeed a matter of great difficulty to discover, and effectually to distinguish, the true motion of particular bodies from the apparent; because the parts of that immovable space, in which those motions are performed, do by no means come under the observation of our senses." Newton The simple answer is that we do see the orbital motion of ourselves and the other planets in a common heliocentric orbit around the Sun,that is the whole point of the Copernican argument.All the academics in Oxford and Cambridge cannot argue against it no matter how well they consider Newton,his reputation and his agenda. The astronomers after Copernicus could easily move between the pre- Copernican and heliocentric systems and in someways an astronomer today has to do the same,between the correct heliocentric methods as opposed to the late 17th century mutations.The names of the great astronomers who could handle the transition between geocentric and heliocentric astronomies and their comments are plain to be see and all the credit goes to these men long after others are forgotten - http://homepages.wmich.edu/~mcgrew/chain.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 28, 10:47 pm, oriel36 wrote:
Will Gerald be buried in Westminster Abbey alongside Newton, Darwin and Herschel? Answers on a postcard please to Oriel 42. C/O Gerald. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 10:03 am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Sep 28, 10:47 pm, oriel36 wrote: Will Gerald be buried in Westminster Abbey alongside Newton, Darwin and Herschel? Answers on a postcard please to Oriel 42. C/O Gerald. The orbital motion of the Earth produces a counter motion which is responsible for the global unequal length of the noon cycle - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg The Equation of Time,therefore represents the rate of change in orbital orientation if axial rotation is considered as constant. There is nothing left of the 'universal law of gravitation' applied to structural astronomy,it is dead and buried along with its exotic extensions of the last century. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:03:14 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Chris.B"
wrote: On Sep 28, 10:47 pm, oriel36 wrote: Will Gerald be buried in Westminster Abbey alongside Newton, Darwin and Herschel? Answers on a postcard please to Oriel 42. C/O Gerald. -- _____________________ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 10:56 pm, Mark McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:03:14 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Chris.B" wrote: On Sep 28, 10:47 pm, oriel36 wrote: Will Gerald be buried in Westminster Abbey alongside Newton, Darwin and Herschel? Answers on a postcard please to Oriel 42. C/O Gerald. -- _____________________ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ What can be said of people who believe that the Earth keeps the same face to the central Sun over the course of an annual orbit while the images of Uranus show that the Earth has a counter motion which is responsible for the unequal length of the noon cycles - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg No offence to the axial tilting Earth guys but it is time to grow up and act with reponsibility,the new motion is there whether I propose it or not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 11:56 pm, Mark McIntyre wrote:
-- _____________________ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ I've got that one. Do you have any doubles you want to swap? :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The basic outlines using modern imaging | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | May 29th 07 12:33 AM |
Modern physics the new Alchemy ? | GatherNoMoss | Policy | 0 | January 28th 07 03:20 PM |
modern eyepiece focusers | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 14th 06 12:46 AM |
Modern Moon | Doink | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | November 16th 04 01:08 AM |
Modern eyepieces? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 28 | January 9th 04 06:39 PM |