3K and matter

If we have no Big Bang the 3K is given by the disintegration of the earliest
neutrons and the production of helium . We have also few energy given by the
stars .
THerefore where we have matter we have 3K, and where we have no matter we
have no 3K.
But to understand this thing it is necessary to give up the Big Bang.

"marie-morichon" wrote in message
...
If we have no Big Bang the 3K is given by the disintegration of the
earliest
neutrons and the production of helium . We have also few energy given by
the
stars .
THerefore where we have matter we have 3K, and where we have no matter we
have no 3K.
But to understand this thing it is necessary to give up the Big Bang.


What the hell is 3K?

On Sep 24, 6:43 am, "Landy" wrote:
"marie-morichon" wrote in message

...

If we have no Big Bang the 3K is given by the disintegration of the
earliest
neutrons and the production of helium . We have also few energy given by
the
stars .
THerefore where we have matter we have 3K, and where we have no matter we
have no 3K.
But to understand this thing it is necessary to give up the Big Bang.

What the hell is 3K?


You should probably be asking what the hell is 2.725 +/- 0.002 ?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/bkg3k.html

Dear marie-morichon:
"marie-morichon" wrote in message
...
If we have no Big Bang the 3K is given by the disintegration
of the earliest neutrons and the production of helium .

So where there is 3K, there was matter.

We have also few energy given by the stars .

Lots of energy. Just very diffused.

THerefore
where we have matter we have 3K, and where we have
no matter we have no 3K.

Large void spaces still carry the CMBR light. There are no great
dark places in CMBR light.

But to understand this thing it is necessary to
give up the Big Bang.

Really? Where did your neutrons come from? Why do you yourself
refer to "earliest"?

David A. Smith