saad's complaint attracts alongside our autumn after we pile above it

in the photos, he's a reputable photog, and the San
# Francisco City Council went so far as to pass a bill/resolution saying
# the FBI should release the collection.
#
# Why have you confiscated photos if no sex is involved? As far as I can
# tell, the photos would be no different from some photog books listed
# in the Library of Congress.
#
# The fact that you've confiscated the photos, but still haven't charged
# the photog, seems to indicate you're operating on auto-pilot, and that
# there is nothing wrong with the photos. I've never seen a news report
# where law enforcement wasn't sure, for this particular charge.
#
# It seems that you think some people may have "dirty thoughts" if they
# see the photos; that would make you the "Thought Police"!
#
# Sincerely,
# Guy


----

The New York Times was no help.

They subsequently reviewed his work and called it ~"boring, been there, done
that". As if what they thought of his photos had a damn thing to do with the
matter.

The New York Times then continued to print topless pictures of young girls,
such as on November 10, 1991. They even printed color nipples of young girls
ages 5-8, confident the FBI wasn't going to bust *them*.

How hypocritical and self-serving.

Get a load of this wording:

* "Former Black Panthers Leader Is Freed on Bail"
* By B. Drummond Ayres Jr., The New York