RELATIVITY WITHOUT EINSTEIN LIGHT POSTULATE

Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult have always tried to get rid of
Einstein's false second (light) postulate and build Einstein's
relativity only on the first postulate:

http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/chronogeometrie.pdf
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "D'autre part, nous savons aujourd'hui que
l'invariance de la vitesse de la lumiere est une consequence de la
nullite de la masse du photon. Mais, empiriquement, cette masse, aussi
faible soit son actuelle borne superieure experimentale, ne peut et ne
pourra jamais etre consideree avec certitude comme rigoureusement
nulle. Il se pourrait meme que de futures mesures mettent en evidence
une masse infime, mais non-nulle, du photon ; la lumiere alors n'irait
plus a la "vitesse de la lumiere", ou, plus precisement, la vitesse de
la lumiere, desormais variable, ne s'identifierait plus a la vitesse
limite invariante. Les procedures operationnelles mises en jeu par le
"second postulat" deviendraient caduques ipso facto. La theorie elle-
meme en serait-elle invalidee ? Heureusement, il n'en est rien ; mais,
pour s'en assurer, il convient de la refonder sur des bases plus
solides, et d'ailleurs plus economiques. En verite, le "premier
postulat" suffit, a la condition de l'exploiter a fond."

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4dc146100e32c?
Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/4114.html
Jong-Ping Hsu: "....unexpected affirmative answer to the long-standing
question of whether it is possible to construct a relativity theory
without postulating the constancy of the speed of light and retaining
only the first postulate of special relativity. This question was
discussed in the early years following the discovery of special
relativity by many physicists, including Ritz, Tolman, Kunz, Comstock
and Pauli, all of whom obtained negative answers."

Now the dream has come true or at least so a scientist claims on
sci.physics.research:

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...50228753ef23c?
http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/0708.0929
http://uk.arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/p...708.0929v1.pdf
Relativity Without Tears, Z. K. Silagadze
"Below I will try to show that, combining the ideas from [21, 22, 23,
31], it is possible to make the one postulate derivation of Lorentz
transformations mathematically as simple as was Einstein's original
presentation."

Strangely, hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult do not comment on
Silagadze's paper. Why?

Pentcho Valev