![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Aug, 03:10, "qbit" wrote:
What is it that RT can do and classical Newton mechanics cannot do? I see only these 3 things that are different between Newton and Einstein: 1) relativistic addition of velocities, ie. limiting speeds to c 2) time dilation depending on the intensity of the gravity field 3) blueshift of light rays due to gravitational attraction These can easily be added to Newtonian mechanics. Are there any other differences? Essentially there is only one difference between Newton and Einstein: The true implication of Newton's particle model of light according to which the speed of photons varies with both (1) the relative speed of the light source and the observer and (2) the gravitational potential, in Einstein's theory was replaced by two statements: (1) Wrong: The speed of light does NOT vary with the relative speed of the light source and the observer. (2) Contradictory: The speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2); also, the speed of light does not vary with the gravitational potential (is constant in a gravitational field); also, the speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential but not in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2). Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Aug, 09:20, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 11 Aug, 03:10, "qbit" wrote: What is it that RT can do and classical Newton mechanics cannot do? I see only these 3 things that are different between Newton and Einstein: 1) relativistic addition of velocities, ie. limiting speeds to c 2) time dilation depending on the intensity of the gravity field 3) blueshift of light rays due to gravitational attraction These can easily be added to Newtonian mechanics. Are there any other differences? Essentially there is only one difference between Newton and Einstein: The true implication of Newton's particle model of light according to which the speed of photons varies with both (1) the relative speed of the light source and the observer and (2) the gravitational potential, in Einstein's theory was replaced by two statements: (1) Wrong: The speed of light does NOT vary with the relative speed of the light source and the observer. (2) Contradictory: The speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2); also, the speed of light does not vary with the gravitational potential (is constant in a gravitational field); also, the speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential but not in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2). Newton's particle model of light obviously deals with DISCONTINUOUS STRUCTURES. On the other hand, Einstein's light postulate http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body." is incompatible with Newton's particle model and can only be dealt with in terms of the wave model of light presenting light as a CONTINUOUS FIELD. Now even the silliest zombies in Einstein criminal cult will be able to understand the confession Einstein made at the end of his life: http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics." Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 août, 09:20, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 11 Aug, 03:10, "qbit" wrote: What is it that RT can do and classical Newton mechanics cannot do? I see only these 3 things that are different between Newton and Einstein: 1) relativistic addition of velocities, ie. limiting speeds to c 2) time dilation depending on the intensity of the gravity field 3) blueshift of light rays due to gravitational attraction These can easily be added to Newtonian mechanics. Are there any other differences? Essentially there is only one difference between Newton and Einstein: The true implication of Newton's particle model of light according to which the speed of photons varies with both (1) the relative speed of the light source and the observer and (2) the gravitational potential, in Einstein's theory was replaced by two statements: (1) Wrong: The speed of light does NOT vary with the relative speed of the light source and the observer. (2) Contradictory: The speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2); also, the speed of light does not vary with the gravitational potential (is constant in a gravitational field); also, the speed of light does vary with the gravitational potential but not in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2). Pentcho Valev Vous ne voulez VRAIMENT pas traduire vos propos ? YT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First XMM-Newton images of impact/XMM-Newton detects water on Tempel1 (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 5th 05 01:52 AM |
differences in dob 8's?? | Davis | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | December 7th 04 05:01 AM |
Time differences between successive moonrises | Mr.Adams | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 30th 04 12:06 AM |
Meade Model Differences | V35B | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 21st 03 04:00 AM |
TAL Differences | James | UK Astronomy | 2 | October 9th 03 02:08 PM |