![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bush's speech is at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040114-3.html There's a White House Fact Sheet at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040114-1.html This is largely the same material as in Bush's speech. Here are reactions. Some compare it with the rumors, such as in the Frank Sietzen Jr. and Keith L. Cowing article http://interestalert.com/brand/sitei...e%20Br eaking * Not much new money. The real number is $1 billion for the 5 years starting in FY'05. Some of the rumors apparently thought that was a 1 year number. * Rumors seem about right regarding the timeline (the new vehicle starts unmanned testing in 2008, the shuttle is retired in 2010, then there is a somewhat mysterious gap whereby the new vehicle doesn't get flown crewed until 2014 - is this to avoid a spike in funding levels or something?). * Can we assume for sure that the new vehicle (CEV) would be a capsule rather than have wings? I'm drawing that conclusion based on Bush's statement "But the main purpose of this spacecraft will be to carry astronauts beyond our orbit to other worlds. This will be the first spacecraft of its kind since the Apollo Command Module." The extra mass of wings is bad enough going to/from Earth orbit, but the penalty is magnified when going to the moon. But I suppose wings would remain at least a possibility in principle. * Cut of $11 billion from NASA's existing 5 year budget (FY'05+). Where does this come from? Just ISS, OSP, etc, which are obvious reallocations given the timeline and such? Is anything taken out of science (there are some scientist reactions at http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...eforbus hplan )? Some scientists complain about the lack of a future for Hubble beyond 2010, when the shuttle is retired. * What would a typical humans-to-the-moon mission look like? I'm assuming something like several EELV Heavy launches, one with a lunar lander (with ascent and descent stages), one with the CEV, one with a propulsion module/fuel to get to a lunar-bound orbit, which then dock together in Earth orbit. Granted, this might be in flux for a while if the first phase is the CEV rather than the lunar mission itself, but surely the design of the CEV would interact a fair bit with the other parts of the lunar mission. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Program Needs The Right Stuff | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 43 | January 22nd 04 01:11 AM |
No Red Space Menace | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 11 | October 18th 03 06:30 AM |
Asteroid first, Moon, Mars Later | Al Jackson | Space Science Misc | 0 | September 3rd 03 03:40 PM |
Is big moon in sky plausible? | Christopher M. Jones | Space Science Misc | 7 | August 31st 03 12:20 PM |