![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an idea I have been thinking about for a while:
Rocket engines are quite efficient at converting chemical energy to linear motion. They also have an astronomically high power to weight ratio. Rocket engines have the disadvantage compared to diesel engines and gas/steam turbines that they need liquid oxygen as an oxidizer instead of air, but given the fact that liquid oxygen is one of the cheapest liquids in existence and can be obtained anywhere by liquefying air that should not be a big deal. To get a rough estimate of the power conversion efficiency of rocket engines, lets examine a large stage combustion engine like the russian RD-170. I am using the data from the encyclopedia astronautica. It has a vacuum specific impulse of 337s. That means an exhaust velocity of 3305.97m/s and thus 5.46471882045 MJ/kg of mechanical energy. Kerosene has a specific chemical energy of 42.8 MJ/kg. With the mixture ratio of 2.6:1 that gives a specific chemical energy of 11.888 MJ/kg for the propellant mixture. The efficiency of conversion from chemical energy to mechanical energy of the exhaust is 0.46 or 46%. The mechanical energy produced is slightly over 21GW! An efficiency of 46% does not sound that good, but the rocket engine would just be the first stage of energy conversion. A mixture ratio of 2.6:1 as with the RD-170 results in a very fuel-rich exhaust which could be burnt with additional oxygen to power a more traditional gas turbine as a second stage and maybe even a steam turbine as a third stage. By combining a rocket engine with a traditional gas turbine, you could easily get an overall conversion efficiency of more than 60%. Not bad for a device with extremely high power to weight ratio. Since the oxydator is pure oxygen the combustion would be extremely hot and clean. There would be no NOx in the exhaust. The exhaust after the second combustion stage would be pure CO2 and H2O. The best way to build a rocket engine for power generation would probably be a rotary rocket engine that uses centrifugal force for pumping the propellants to very high pressure. It would be disk-shaped and rotating with a rim velocity of 3000m/s. The combustion chambers would be at the rim like in the original rotaryrocket designs. It would have to be made from high tensile strength materials like carbon fiber composite and be tapered from the hub to the rim to withstand the enormous centrifugal forces. It would contain some neodymium permanent magnets near the hub for direct conversion of its rotation energy to electrical energy. These could also be used for controlling the rotation speed. It would obviously be quite a challenge to get such a design reliable and durable enough for power generation, but at least you do not need oxygen-rich preburners like in the RD-170 because of the centrifugal pumping. One thing that might be a problem is that the propellant pressure at the rim would be much too high for normal combustion chamber designs, but there should be a way to cope with that, for example by putting the combustion chambers more towards the hub of the disk. So what do you think. Is this a) theoretically impossible b) theoretically possible but practically impossible because of the lack of suitable materials c) just not worth doing or d) a good idea? best regards, Rüdiger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Breathing for VTVL | johnhare | Technology | 21 | February 14th 04 04:22 AM |
Back to the Future? The Command Module Flies Again? | Rusty B | Policy | 280 | February 7th 04 06:49 AM |
Improved Specific Impulse Rocket Engines | Mike Miller | Technology | 12 | December 24th 03 06:50 AM |
Rockets not carrying fuel. | Robert Clark | Technology | 3 | August 7th 03 01:22 PM |