THE OTHER EINSTEIN

http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

No the renunciation of the space-time continuum comes from Einstein
himself, and your masters regard it as a salvation:

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/ind...ecture_id=3576

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

No the renunciation of the space-time continuum comes from Einstein
himself, and your masters regard it as a salvation:

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

No the renunciation of the space-time continuum comes from Einstein
himself, and your masters regard it as a salvation:

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

You don't believe me. I am so sorry. Yes your masters do see the
renunciation of the space-time continuum as a salvation:

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20279

Master Tom Roberts however still loves the space-time continuum:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...a57d13026bcb8?

Pentcho Valev

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ups.com...
Jeckyl wrote:
"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel
ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can
give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a
continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with
certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by
a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this
other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with
the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of
the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

No the renunciation of the space-time continuum comes from Einstein
himself, and your masters regard it as a salvation:

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

You don't believe me. I am so sorry. Yes your masters do see the
renunciation of the space-time continuum as a salvation:

More crap from self-obsessed leakage from the **** valve

On Jun 6, 6:50 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself.

Would this be *Bruno Stachel*, who stopped at nothig to get the Blue
Max in World War I, and was killed in his dastardly attempt to do so?

This could explain it.

On Jun 6, 7:37 am, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
wrote:
On Jun 6, 6:50 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself.

Would this be *Bruno Stachel*, who stopped at nothig to get the Blue
Max in World War I, and was killed in his dastardly attempt to do so?

This could explain it.

Actually the concept stems from two or three[1]
other authorities who successfully localised the
energy imparted to a bullet.

"Matter there causes inertia here"
--E.Mach

"Kill the wabbit! Kill the wabbit!"
--E.Fudd


Sue...

[1]
I shall turn to those problems which are
related to the development which I have
traced. Already Newton recognized that the
law of inertia is unsatisfactory
in a context so far unmentioned in this
exposition, namely that it gives no
real cause for the special physical
position of the states of motion of the
inertial frames relative to all other
states of motion. It makes the observable
material bodies responsible for the
gravitational behaviour of a material
point, yet indicates no material cause
for the inertial behaviour of the material
point but devises the cause for it
(absolute space or inertial ether). This
is not logically inadmissible although
it is unsatisfactory. For this reason
E. Mach demanded a modification of the
law of inertia in the sense that the
inertia should be interpreted as an
acceleration resistance of the bodies
against one another and not against "space".
This interpretation governs the expectation
that accelerated bodies have concordant
accelerating action in the same
sense on other bodies (acceleration induction).
This interpretation is even more
plausible according to general relativity
which eliminates the distinction between
inertial and gravitational effects.
It amounts to stipulating that, apart
from the arbitrariness governed by the
free choice of coordinates, the
gm v -field shall be completely determined
by the matter. Mach's stipulation is favoured
in general relativity by the circumstance
that acceleration induction in accordance
with the gravitational field equations really
exists, although of such slight intensity
that direct detection by mechanical experiments
is out of the question.
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/p...n-lecture.html

Clearly this give a definitive reason for the cause of homosexuality.

Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/aug252003/518.pdf
"In the second essay in this part entitled 'The other Einstein:
Einstein contra field theory', Stachel portrays Einstein, the author
of the space-time continuum field theory, as one who questions the
fundamental significance of space-time continuum itself. Stachel ends
this section with the last published words of Einstein, 'one can give
good reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous
field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty
that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a
finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in
accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to
find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But
nobody knows how to obtain the basis of such a theory'. Did this other
Einstein have the last word?"

The other Einstein knew that the speed of discontinuous particles of
light, photons, varied with the gravitational potential (see Chapter
22 in his "Relativity"). He had certainly applied the equivalence
principle and obtained that, since the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential, it also varies with the relative speed of the
light source and the observer. And the other Einstein knew what that
meant:

Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by the
speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

Einstein again: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that
case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

Pentcho Valev

I thought it was all over when I heard the fat lady sing
until I discovered she was a drag queen. Now, I'm to confused
to to comprehend the conceptual compliment.