A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hawking 180



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 07, 06:08 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
TMA[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hawking 180

Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


  #2  
Old May 23rd 07, 06:43 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Eugene Griessel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 336
Default Hawking 180

"TMA" wrote:

Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


You know little about physics and even less about physicists.


Eugene L Griessel

Kissing is just pressing your lips to the sweet end of 66 feet of
intestines.
  #3  
Old May 23rd 07, 09:45 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Stuart Chapman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Hawking 180

TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking
has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to
change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science
is all about.

--
Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com
  #4  
Old May 23rd 07, 09:45 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Stuart Chapman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Hawking 180

TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking
has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to
change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science
is all about.

--
Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com
  #5  
Old May 23rd 07, 09:47 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Stuart Chapman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Hawking 180

TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking
has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to
change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science
is all about.

--
Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com
  #6  
Old May 23rd 07, 04:40 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
TMA[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hawking 180


"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message
...
"TMA" wrote:

Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes
do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


You know little about physics and even less about physicists.


Making statements like that with nothing to back it up points to
assholishness..not foolishness.


  #7  
Old May 23rd 07, 04:41 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
TMA[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hawking 180


"Stuart Chapman" wrote in message
...
TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes
do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to
this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits
to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.

I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking
has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to
change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science is
all about.

--
Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com


One more time...


  #8  
Old May 23rd 07, 04:46 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Eugene Griessel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 336
Default Hawking 180

"TMA" wrote:


"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message
...
"TMA" wrote:

Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes
do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this
universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to
another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk.


You know little about physics and even less about physicists.


Making statements like that with nothing to back it up points to
assholishness..not foolishness.


Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in
fact overjoyed. Which merely confirms my earlier statement that you
know little about physics.

Eugene L Griessel

History is littered with wars that no one believed would happen.
That's never stopped anyone waging them.
  #9  
Old May 23rd 07, 06:01 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
TMA[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hawking 180




Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in
fact overjoyed.


Not according to the article I read...ASSHOLE!


  #10  
Old May 23rd 07, 06:32 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Greg Neill[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 386
Default Hawking 180

"TMA" wrote in message
news:as_4i.50331$V75.17433@edtnps89...



Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in
fact overjoyed.


Not according to the article I read...ASSHOLE!


What article would that be?

And why the nasty attitude, dude?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hawking Radiation John Schutkeker Astronomy Misc 3 July 29th 06 05:19 PM
Pinkerton On Hawking Rand Simberg Policy 31 July 1st 06 04:36 AM
Stephen Hawking Pat Flannery History 8 June 16th 06 11:18 AM
Stephen Hawking MoFo Amateur Astronomy 4 June 16th 06 05:56 AM
Hawking papers Allan Adler Astronomy Misc 3 March 10th 05 07:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.