![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do
retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TMA" wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. You know little about physics and even less about physicists. Eugene L Griessel Kissing is just pressing your lips to the sweet end of 66 feet of intestines. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science is all about. -- Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science is all about. -- Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TMA wrote:
Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science is all about. -- Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message ... "TMA" wrote: Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. You know little about physics and even less about physicists. Making statements like that with nothing to back it up points to assholishness..not foolishness. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stuart Chapman" wrote in message ... TMA wrote: Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. I don't any of the details of what you're talking about, but if Hawking has completely changed his mind on something, good on him. Being able to change your viewpoint on the basis of new evidence is what good science is all about. -- Stupot http://insignity.blogspot.com One more time... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TMA" wrote:
"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message ... "TMA" wrote: Yep, Stephen did a 180 to the dismay of dedicated physicists. Black holes do retain information about the masses they consume and return them to this universe in an altered state. His black holes now are not conduits to another universe but are bound to this one. TSK..tsk. You know little about physics and even less about physicists. Making statements like that with nothing to back it up points to assholishness..not foolishness. Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in fact overjoyed. Which merely confirms my earlier statement that you know little about physics. Eugene L Griessel History is littered with wars that no one believed would happen. That's never stopped anyone waging them. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in fact overjoyed. Not according to the article I read...ASSHOLE! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TMA" wrote in message
news:as_4i.50331$V75.17433@edtnps89... Physicist are seldom dismayed when theories are changed - most are in fact overjoyed. Not according to the article I read...ASSHOLE! What article would that be? And why the nasty attitude, dude? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hawking Radiation | John Schutkeker | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 29th 06 05:19 PM |
Pinkerton On Hawking | Rand Simberg | Policy | 31 | July 1st 06 04:36 AM |
Stephen Hawking | Pat Flannery | History | 8 | June 16th 06 11:18 AM |
Stephen Hawking | MoFo | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 16th 06 05:56 AM |
Hawking papers | Allan Adler | Astronomy Misc | 3 | March 10th 05 07:39 AM |