![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We're trying to data formats a new spectral instrument. It will produce
binary tables in a vaguely SDFITS-like format, with a table column that contains a data array. The array will have multiple axes: time, frequency, polarization, etc., usually with only the frequency axis being nondegenerate, with table rows generated (say) once per second. At moderate data rates, the header information changes slowly compared to the spectral dump rate, and the time axis may become nondegenerate within a record. However, at the highest data rates packed binary data (say 2 bits per sample) will have to be stored, and we're trying to figure out how to best describe those in a way consistent with "principle of least astonishment". Do others have experience or suggestions with this? Thanks, -Mike -- Mike Nolan +1 787 878 2612x334 Fax: +1 787 878 1861 Arecibo Observatory, HC 3 Box 53995, Arecibo, Puerto Rico 00612 USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Power-packed results? | roberts | Policy | 5 | April 3rd 05 02:56 AM |
Star Packed: Super cluster | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 2nd 05 07:32 AM |
Power-packed results? | roberts | Policy | 0 | March 24th 05 12:40 PM |
[fitsbits] FITS Binary Table Proposals | William Pence | FITS | 5 | November 23rd 04 08:54 PM |
[fitsbits] Start of Public Comment Period on FITS Binary TableProposals | William Pence | FITS | 2 | October 19th 04 02:31 PM |