THE BIG DRY IN AUSTRALIA _ resulting from well known Collective Crimes

I am proud to say that I have the situation completely under control,
and am indeed monitoring the progression of the Divine Drudging
Drought in australia, lounging on the lush green lawn under the
shadows of my hazel trees here.
I am pleased to say that everything's going according to plan.
Great !

Since on the other side the Mining Criminals of Newmont / Newcrest &
BHP / Billiton, the West Australia Whorehouse aka Parliament and
should I say all australian corrupt-to-the-core Political class + as
well all antipodean convict rabble at large SEEM NOT ONLY TO ENJOY
THE
SITUATION BUT FURTHER STILL ARE DENYING BOTH THE COLLECTIVE CRIMES
AND
IT JUST CHASTIMENT, I see no reason why the DDD should be called
off !


With best but sorry regards


Please read on below that most interesting article titled THE BIG DRY


Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre mines in the Great Sandy Desert


Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464
Founder of the True Geology


~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~


for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
************************************************** ****************


http://www.economist.com/world/displ...ory_id=9071007
Australia's water shortage


THE BIG DRY
Apr 26th 2007 | MURRAY MOUTH, SOUTH AUSTRALIA



From The Economist print edition


Australia is struggling to cope with the consequences of a
devastating
drought. As the world warms up, other countries should pay heed
Rex Features
THE mouth of the Murray-Darling river sets an idyllic scene. Anglers
in wide-brimmed sunhats wade waist-deep into the azure water.
Pleasure
boats cruise languidly around the sandbanks that dot the narrow
channel leading to the Southern Ocean. Pensioners stroll along the
beach. But over the cries of the seagulls and the rush of the waves,
there is another sound: the mechanical drone from a dredging vessel.
It never stops and must run around the clock to prevent the river
mouth from silting up. Although the Murray-Darling is Australia's
longest river system, draining a basin the size of France and Spain
combined, it no longer carries enough water to carve its own path to
the sea.

John Howard, Australia's prime minister, arrived here in February and
urged the four states through which the Murray-Darling flows to hand
their authority over the river to the federal government. After seven
years of drought, and many more years of over-exploitation and
pollution, he argued that the only hope of restoring the river to
health lies in a complete overhaul of how it is managed. As the
states
weigh the merits of Mr Howard's scheme, the river is degenerating
further. Every month hydrologists announce that its flow has fallen
to
a new record low (see chart). In April Mr Howard warned that farmers
would not be allowed to irrigate their crops at all next year without
unexpectedly heavy rain in the next few months. A region that
accounts
for 40% of Australia's agriculture, and 85% of its irrigation, is on
the verge of ruin.


The drought knocked one percentage point off Australia's growth rate
last year, by the government's reckoning. It is paying out A$2m
($1.7m) a day in drought-relief to farmers. If mature vines and fruit
trees die in the coming months through the lack of water, the
economic
fallout will be more serious and lasting. Most alarming of all, the
Murray-Darling's troubles are likely to worsen. As Australia's
population continues to grow so does demand for water in the cities
and for the crops that grow in the river basin. Meanwhile, global
warming appears to be heating the basin up and drying it out.
Although
few scientists are confident that they can ascribe any individual
event
-including today's drought-to global warming, most agree that
droughts
like the present one will become more common.


Many of the world's rivers, including the Colorado in America,
China's
Yellow river and the Tagus, which flows through Spain and Portugal,
are suffering a similar plight. As the world warms up, hundreds of
millions of people will face the same ecological crisis as the
residents of the Murray-Darling basin. As water levels dwindle, rows
about how supplies should be used are turning farmers against city-
dwellers and pitching environmentalists against politicians.
Australia
has a strong economy, a well-funded bureaucracy and robust political
institutions. If it is struggling to respond to this crisis, imagine
how drought will tear apart other, less prepared parts of the world.


Droughts have long plagued the Murray-Darling. The region is
afflicted
by a periodic weather pattern known as El Niño. At irregular
intervals
of two to seven years, the waters of the central Pacific warm up,
heralding inclement weather throughout the southern hemisphere.
Torrential rains flood the coast of Peru, while south-eastern
Australia wilts in drought. The duration of these episodes is as
unpredictable as their arrival. They can range from a few months to
several years. As a result, the flow of the Darling, the longest
tributary of the Murray, varies wildly, from as little as 0.04% of
the
long-term average to as much as 911%. Although the most recent El
Niño
ended earlier this year, it has left the soils in the basin so dry
and
the groundwater so depleted that the Murray-Darling's flow continues
to fall, despite normal levels of rainfall over the past few months.


Protracted droughts are a part of Australian folklore. Schoolchildren
learn a hackneyed Victorian poem in praise of "a sunburnt
country...of
droughts and flooding rains". Dorothea Mackellar wrote those lines
just after the "Federation drought" of the late 1890s and early
1900s.
The recession that accompanied it was so severe that it helped nudge
Australia's six states, at the time separate British colonies, into
uniting as a federation, or commonwealth, as Australians tend to call
it.


Water politics
Negotiations over the federal constitution almost foundered on the
subject of the Murray-Darling. South Australia, at the mouth of the
river, wanted it kept open for navigation to the hinterland, allowing
the state to become a trading hub. Its capital, Adelaide, also
depended on water piped from the Murray to keep its taps running-as
it
still does. Further upstream, Victoria and New South Wales wanted to
build dams to encourage agriculture. Queensland played little part in
the row, since its stretch of the Darling was sparsely populated at
the time. In the end, Victoria and New South Wales agreed to ensure a
minimum flow to South Australia and to divide the remaining water
equally between themselves. Like their counterparts elsewhere in the
world, Australian engineers gaily pockmarked the basin with dams,
weirs and locks, with little thought for what that would do
downstream.


By the 1990s the drawbacks were evident. For one thing, states were
allowing irrigators to use too much water. By 1994 human activity was
consuming 77% of the river's average annual flow, even though the
actual flow falls far below the average in dry years. The mouth of
the
river was beginning to silt up-a powerful symbol of over-
exploitation.
Thanks to a combination of reduced flow and increased run-off from
saline soils churned up by agriculture, the water was becoming
unhealthily salty, especially in its lower reaches. The tap water in
Adelaide, which draws 40% of its municipal supplies from the river
and
up to 90% when other reserves dry up, was beginning to taste saline.
The number of indigenous fish was falling, since the floods that
induce them to spawn were becoming rarer. Toxic algae flourished in
the warmer, more sluggish waters. In 1991 a hideous bloom choked a
1,000km (625 mile) stretch of the Darling.


Such horrors stirred indignation among urban Australians. The bad
publicity put tourists off river cruises, fishing trips and visits to
the basin's various lakes and wetlands. Many small businesses got
hurt
in the process. The citizens of Adelaide, which contains several
marginal parliamentary seats, began to worry that the taps would run
dry. Farmers were also starting to fear for the security and quality
of their water supplies.


So Australia embarked on a series of reforms that in many ways serve
as a model for the management of big, heavily exploited rivers. New
South Wales, Victoria and South Australia agreed to cap the amount of
water they took from the river and to keep clear, public records of
water-use rights. They also made plans to reduce salinity and
increase
"environmental flows". The commonwealth agreed to encourage this by
allocating buckets of cash to compliant states. All these initiatives
were to be managed by a body, called the Murray-Darling Basin
Commission, in which the commonwealth and the various riparian
states,
including Queensland and the tiny Australian Capital Territory (ACT),
had equal representation and where decisions were taken by consensus.


Moreover, Australia's politicians also agreed to a set of principles
by which water should be managed throughout the country. There should
be no more subsidies for irrigation. Farmers should pay for the
maintenance of channels and dams. For each river and tributary,
scientists would calculate the maximum sustainable allocations of
water and states would make sure that extractions did not exceed that
figure. To ensure that such a scarce resource was used as efficiently
as possible, water should be tradable, both within and between
states.
And the minimum environmental flows necessary to keep the river in
good health should be accorded just as high a status as water put to
commercial uses.


Guided by these principles, the states and the commonwealth have made
much progress. By 1999 the average salinity of the river in South
Australia had fallen by over 20%. In the late 1990s salinity levels
were falling within the prescribed limit over 90% of the time,
compared with roughly 60% in the 1970s and 1980s. The construction of
fish ladders around dams and weirs, and the release of extra water
into important breeding grounds, has spawned a recovery in native
species. The commission is spending A$650m to boost environmental
flows, mainly by stemming losses from irrigation, and hence leaving
more water in the river.


The trade in water has taken off. There are two basic sorts of
transaction: sales of part of a farmer's water allocation for the
year
or a permanent transfer. Temporary exchanges between farmers in the
same state topped 1,000 gigalitres (220 billion gallons) in 2003, or
around a tenth of all water used for agriculture. That roughly
matches
the cumulative amount of water that has changed hands permanently
within the same state.


Meanwhile, the commission has codified rules for trading water
between
users in different states. The volumes are much smaller, but the
system is working as economists had hoped. In general, water is
flowing from regions with salty soil to more fertile ones; from farms
that are profligate with water to ones that are more efficient; and
from low-value crops to more profitable ones. In particular,
struggling dairy and rice farmers in New South Wales and Victoria
have
sold water to the booming orchards and vineyards of South Australia.
A
government assessment of a pilot scheme for interstate trade
determined that such shifts prompted A$767m of extra investment in
irrigation and food-processing between 1997 and 2001. Another study
found that water trading helped to reduce the damage wrought by
droughts.


But there are lots of problems. For one thing, the reforms concern
only water that has already reached the river. Farmers in certain
states can still drill wells to suck up groundwater, and tree
plantations absorb a lot of rainwater that would otherwise find its
way into the river. Little dams on farms, which block small streams
or
trap run-off from rain or flooding, are an even bigger worry. Little
is known about how many there are or how fast their numbers are
growing. In theory, most states are trying to regulate them, but the
rules are full of loopholes and enforcement is difficult.
Hydrologists
fear that the severity of the drought has encouraged farmers to build
more dams.


Some states are keener on the reforms than others. In 1995, when New
South Wales, South Australia and Victoria agreed to cap the amount of
water they took from the river, Queensland refused to join them on
the
grounds that it uses only a tiny share of the basin's water. The
state
government felt it had a right to promote irrigation along its
stretch
of the Darling to bring Queensland to the same level of agricultural
development as the other states. It has since agreed to negotiate a
cap. But earlier this year, despite the ongoing drought, it awarded
new water-use rights to farmers on the Warrego, one of the
tributaries
of the Darling.


New South Wales, meanwhile, frequently exceeds its cap. Its farmers
plant mainly annual crops, such as rice and wheat, instead of
perennials like fruit trees or grape vines. If there is not enough
water to go round, its farmers may suffer for a season, but their
earnings are not permanently diminished. So the state tends to be
less
cautious in its allocation of water than Victoria or South Australia.
However, the commission has no power to ensure that states stick to
their caps. It can only denounce offenders publicly, in the forlorn
hope that the shame will induce them to behave better.


Climate change is likely to exacerbate all these disputes. The
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO),
a government agency, estimates that it could reduce the Murray's flow
by as much as 5% in 20 years and 15% in 50 years. But other
projections are much more cataclysmic. CSIRO cites a worst case of
20%
less water in 20 years and 50% in 50 years. Peter Cullen, an academic
and member of the government's National Water Commission, points out
that inflows to the Murray have fallen to less than half of their
long-
term average over the past six years. He thinks it would be prudent
to
manage water on the assumption that low flows are here to stay.


Mr Howard argues that the Murray-Darling Basin Commission moves too
slowly to cope with all the upheaval. He wants the states to
surrender
their powers over the basin to the commonwealth. That will allow his
government, he says, to work out exactly how much water is being
siphoned off through wells and dams, and to use that information to
set a new, sustainable cap on water use.


The government would also help farmers meet the new restrictions by
investing in more efficient irrigation or by buying up their water
rights-all without any of the typical bickering and foot-dragging
that
have held up collective action in the past. To entice the states to
agree, he is offering to spend A$10 billion of the commonwealth's
money on the various schemes. But the advantage of adopting policies
by consensus, presumably, is that they may prove more durable than
anything imposed from Canberra. National governments, even in
Australia, are not immune to inefficiency and bias. They are often at
loggerheads with the states.


Moreover, not all Australians want to move as quickly as Mr Howard
does. He faces an election later this year in which his environmental
record-and particularly his lack of action on global warming-will be
a
big issue. Nor does the federal government have any experience of
managing rivers. In a recent book, "Water Politics in the Murray-
Darling Basin", Daniel Connell argues that any institutional
arrangement that fails to give enough weight to regional concerns
will
not last.


Running a river
Several state governments have their doubts about Mr Howard's plan.
South Australia wants the administration of the river put in the
hands
of a panel of independent experts. Victoria, the only state to reject
the prime minister's scheme outright, says that he could achieve the
same goals without any extra powers by simply withholding money from
recalcitrant states. Its government has also complained that the
scheme would reward the most wasteful irrigators for their
inefficiency, by helping to pay for improvements to their
infrastructure and then allowing them to use much of the water saved.
So the extravagant irrigators of New South Wales will end up with
extra water, while their parsimonious counterparts in Victoria will
benefit less.


Moreover, many Australians are uncomfortable with the idea of water
trading, says Blair Nancarrow, the head of the Australian Research
Centre for Water in Society, a division of CSIRO. People living in
less fertile areas fear that local farmers will gradually sell all
their water rights, eroding employment and commerce and killing off
the area's towns. Concerned politicians have insisted on limits to
the
amount of water that can be traded out of regions and states each
year
and have refused to allow the commission to buy water directly from
farmers for environmental flows. The National Party, the junior
partner in Australia's coalition government, draws much of its
support
from the countryside and is particularly reluctant to give free rein
to the water market.


In the eyes of Mr Cullen, however, many of the changes Australians
fear are inevitable. As it is, he notes, the amount of money farms
make for every million litres of water they use varies dramatically
between states, from roughly A$300 in New South Wales to A$600 in
Victoria and A$1,000 in South Australia. He believes that investment
and water will continue to gravitate towards the bigger, more
professionally managed farms. In the long run, the irrigation of
pasture for livestock, which currently consumes about half of the
basin's agricultural water, will not make sense. The number of small,
family-owned farms will shrink.


Ian Zadow owns just such a farm, near Murray Bridge in South
Australia, which has been in the family since 1905. He is also head
of
the local irrigators' association. His son used to work on the farm
with him. But farming cannot support two families, so the younger man
has taken a job tending graveyards instead. "If you can pay all your
bills and get three meals on the table," says Mr Zadow, "that's about
as good as it is going to get."


At the moment however, things are nowhere near that good. Last year,
he saw his allocation of water slashed first by 20%, then by 30% and
finally by 40%. Next season, unless much more rain falls, he stands
to
get no allocation at all. He feels that city-dwellers should do their
bit to help farmers by conserving more water. When push comes to
shove, he says, politicians will always give priority to the cities
over the countryside, since they are home to more voters. He also
thinks irrigators in New South Wales and Victoria should be trying
harder to save water. Before too long Mr Zadow's complaints may be
echoed by millions of farmers around the world.


If the Australian drought continues, the thousands who depend on
irrigation water for a living will be in deep trouble. Many are
already in debt and struggling to make ends meet. When asked what
will
happen if there is no water for them this year, Mr Zadow hesitates
for
a moment before replying, "Christ knows."

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:15 -0700, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia
of all Times wrote:

I am proud to say that I have the situation completely under control,
and am indeed monitoring the progression of the Divine Drudging Drought
in australia, lounging on the lush green lawn under the shadows of my
hazel trees here.
I am pleased to say that everything's going according to plan. Great !


The only thing you have under control is the fleshy protuberance that you
are currently tugging at furiously. Did you know it can drop off if you
play with it too much?

Hazel trees - pfft. I spent the afternoon yesterday walking in my
favorite rainforest around these parts (at Mt Glorious). Your ****y Hazel
tree and lawn is a pathetic joke compared with the forests of the
D'Aguillar range. It was plenty wet enough to pick up a few leeches.

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:15 -0700, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia
of all Times wrote:

I am proud to say that I have the situation completely under control,
and am indeed monitoring the progression of the Divine Drudging Drought
in australia, lounging on the lush green lawn under the shadows of my
hazel trees here.
I am pleased to say that everything's going according to plan. Great !


Turdy,

No control at all so it seems.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...html?from=top5

""It would be our best fall for a long time and it's still hanging around.
We are expecting there could be more during the day, which is very good
news." ... it had been "five or six years . . . even 10 years" since good
rain early in the season had allowed farmers to get their crops off to a
good start.

Eduard

"Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times"
wrote in message
ups.com...
I am proud to say that I have the situation completely under control,
and am indeed monitoring the progression of the Divine Drudging
Drought in australia, lounging on the lush green lawn under the
shadows of my hazel trees here.
I am pleased to say that everything's going according to plan.

Eduardo - how dare you attempt to disillusion the greatest aussie of all
time.

There is Jean enjoying a great wank underneath his HazelNUT trees at the
asile pour l'aliéné.
and you seduce him into thinking about realities.

How very inconsiderate of you.

On 27 avr, 04:33, "Eduard Groenstein" wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:51:15 -0700, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia

of all Times wrote:
I am proud to say that I have the situation completely under control,
and am indeed monitoring the progression of the Divine Drudging Drought
in australia, lounging on the lush green lawn under the shadows of my
hazel trees here.
I am pleased to say that everything's going according to plan. Great !

The only thing you have under control is the fleshy protuberance that you
are currently tugging at furiously. Did you know it can drop off if you
play with it too much?

Hazel trees - pfft. I spent the afternoon yesterday walking in my
favorite rainforest around these parts (at Mt Glorious). Your ****y Hazel
tree and lawn is a pathetic joke compared with the forests of the
D'Aguillar range. It was plenty wet enough to pick up a few leeches.

Eduardo,

You must not take your wishes for reality, The Economist is a serious
paper and the few drops your got are already things of the past ...
Check it my little pet !
Further still, you have not even read that article, relaying what is
said in dozen of other papers regarding the Toadland desperate
situation !!! ... at the image of now 300 australian farmers having
committed suicide since beginning of 2006 !

Nothing to celebrate indeed !

I know you are very happy about finding some leeches, the very few
which have escaped to your billions of poisonous cane toads
plague ...I love those Cane Toads you got in the Toadland ... and this
is a well deserved return of the pendulum over the insults your kind
have levelled at those poor Frenchmen unfortunate enough to have
migrated to your Hell on Earth !
Frogs for French people and Frogland for France, when it was not "
cheese eating surrendering french monkeys " indeed

By the way, have you tried as yet your Mining Criminals & Mining Hero
Dr David Stuart Tyrwhitt 's way to discover hidden mines ? You know of
course : I spotted the site from the air and landed nearby in the
Desert to take samples ! Try it ...it 's a very good way and it will
cost you only one hour flight time + of course the price of the
crushed plane ? ...but may be you can't afford that ...while the
Mining Criminals on the other hand could .... what a pity Eduardo,
this was your chance to become famous, and in the Land of *******s to
become a Hero of their ****ed up Mining History

With most kind but very sorry regards


Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:52:37 -0700, sir.jpturcau wrote:


You must not take your wishes for reality, The Economist is a serious
paper and the few drops your got are already things of the past ...
Check it my little pet !

It is better to research the local news where the events are taking place.
Melbourne's The Age headline reads "Drenching rain set for the weekend".

http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...459980649.html


Nothing to celebrate indeed !

Much to celebrate

I know you are very happy about finding some leeches, the very few which
have escaped to your billions of poisonous cane toads plague ...I love
those Cane Toads you got in the Toadland ... and this is a well deserved
return of the pendulum over the insults your kind have levelled at those
poor Frenchmen unfortunate enough to have migrated to your Hell on Earth

Toads have had no effect on leech populations at all you silly fart. Cane
toads have been living in Brisbane and its hinterland for decades -
perhaps as early as the 1950s. Their population is pretty stable and
hasn't had a disastrous effect. There has been a reduction in numbers of
some poisonous snake species in some areas. In the rainforests the cane
toads haven't had a big impact at all.

Toads also make excellent sport for motorists, since they can practice
wheel placement skills. If a toad is facing just the right direction your
tyre will seal it so it explodes like a balloon and produce a cracking
sound as the reward, otherwise you just feel a rubbery thunk thonk.


Frogs for French people and Frogland for France, when it was not "
cheese eating surrendering french monkeys " indeed

Frog is a good term for a people who feed on pond life.

If it wasn't for thousands of brave young Australian men (including my own
grandfather) you would now be ruled by and getting ****ed in the arse by
Germans. You weren't capable of defending youselves from a technologically
more advanced culture.

The French have been much more problematic than cane toads. You poisoned
thousands of Australian and New Zealand children with radioactive milk and
the French State committed acts of international terrorism and murder
(witness the Rainbow Warrior sinking). There is also the mistreatment of
the native peoples in New Caledonia.

The French collective crimes in the Pacific alone are worthy of a UN
inquiry.


Eduard

On 27 avr, 19:16, "Eduard Groenstein" wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:52:37 -0700, sir.jpturcau wrote:
You must not take your wishes for reality, The Economist is a serious
paper and the few drops your got are already things of the past ...
Check it my little pet !

It is better to research the local news where the events are taking place.
Melbourne's The Age headline reads "Drenching rain set for the weekend".

http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...et-for-the-wee...

Nothing to celebrate indeed !

Much to celebrate

I know you are very happy about finding some leeches, the very few which
have escaped to your billions of poisonous cane toads plague ...I love
those Cane Toads you got in the Toadland ... and this is a well deserved
return of the pendulum over the insults your kind have levelled at those
poor Frenchmen unfortunate enough to have migrated to your Hell on Earth

Toads have had no effect on leech populations at all you silly fart. Cane
toads have been living in Brisbane and its hinterland for decades -
perhaps as early as the 1950s. Their population is pretty stable and
hasn't had a disastrous effect. There has been a reduction in numbers of
some poisonous snake species in some areas. In the rainforests the cane
toads haven't had a big impact at all.

Toads also make excellent sport for motorists, since they can practice
wheel placement skills. If a toad is facing just the right direction your
tyre will seal it so it explodes like a balloon and produce a cracking
sound as the reward, otherwise you just feel a rubbery thunk thonk.

Frogs for French people and Frogland for France, when it was not "
cheese eating surrendering french monkeys " indeed

Frog is a good term for a people who feed on pond life.

If it wasn't for thousands of brave young Australian men (including my own
grandfather) you would now be ruled by and getting ****ed in the arse by
Germans. You weren't capable of defending youselves from a technologically
more advanced culture.

The French have been much more problematic than cane toads. You poisoned
thousands of Australian and New Zealand children with radioactive milk and
the French State committed acts of international terrorism and murder
(witness the Rainbow Warrior sinking). There is also the mistreatment of
the native peoples in New Caledonia.

The French collective crimes in the Pacific alone are worthy of a UN
inquiry.

Eduard

Oh so Eduardo ... you forgot the story of your own atomic experiences
conducted right into the Toadland ...and right upon your own soldiers
indeed !
600 or a whole regiment was irradiated in one go and all perished
within 6 months !!!
Never heard of it I suppose ?

....and if it was not for the French invading Angleterre on the 11th
century, with Guillaume Le Conquérand, you would not be speaking a
proper language inherited from that superior civilisation indeed !
Also Richard Coeur de Lion was French as you probably ignore ... as
well as Jeanne of Arc was in actual fact the cousin of the King of
England and hence the sister of Charles the VII ( the King of France)
since her mother Isabeau de Bavière had her from the Duc
d'Orleans .... She was never burned at the stake in Rouen then ...

By the way the Jews are not responsible for the death of Jesus Christ
simple since that spook was made up by the Council of Nicea in 312 ,
on the basis of Judah bar Judah of Gamala aka Massada, the Zealot
stronghold .... and all that fraud is still going on after so many
years !

I will reply to the rest later on in the night .... what I note
though is your incapacity to admit your own crimes at any time ... and
this is typical trait of criminals especially your kind of Criminals
Indeed never in the course of any conversation you have ever told me :
Thank you Sir for what you have done for the country ... of this as
any of your kind, you are completely unable ( except the very few I
know )
I suppose you believe once a mine or a discovery is made, it's all so
evident that there is no merit in it at all ... it is not so
Eduardo !

....by the way too what was your grand father doing in France during
the war, just for the heck of it ! Firing guns in the first line ?
Tell me !


See you in early morning hours then !

By the way we shall never met ....meeting any of you dishonest
antipodean *******s is completely beyond my strength ... ever though
I am very fit & healthy

Sir Jean-Paul

"Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times" wrote in message oups.com...
Oh so Eduardo ... you forgot the story of your own atomic experiences
conducted right into the Toadland ...and right upon your own soldiers
indeed !
600 or a whole regiment was irradiated in one go and all perished
within 6 months !!!

** You are a liar as well as an idiot Le Turd


By the way we shall never met ....meeting any of you dishonest
antipodean *******s is completely beyond my strength ... ever though
I am very fit & healthy


** Give yourself another enema, but this time make sure you insert the nozzle from both ends.

"Sunny" wrote in message
...



By the way we shall never met ....meeting any of you dishonest
antipodean *******s is completely beyond my strength ... ever though
I am very fit & healthy

Please don't slur the antipodes with the Le Turd's name - he is French,
not Antipodean!
cheers
Bill

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:50:34 -0700, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia
of all Times wrote:


Oh so Eduardo ... you forgot the story of your own atomic experiences
conducted right into the Toadland ...and right upon your own soldiers
indeed !

Yes you are right. The British conducted tests here as well but that was
earlier in the atomic era and was naive unlike the French testing which
was arrogant and malicious. There surely were cancers from the Australian
testing but there wasn't a regiment killed you Wally.


...and if it was not for the French invading Angleterre on the 11th
century, with Guillaume Le Conquérand, you would not be speaking a
proper language inherited from that superior civilisation indeed !

I am thankful that English is not a Romance language.

Also Richard Coeur de Lion was French as you probably ignore ... as well
as Jeanne of Arc was in actual fact the cousin of the King of England
and hence the sister of Charles the VII ( the King of France) since her
mother Isabeau de Bavière had her from the Duc d'Orleans .... She was
never burned at the stake in Rouen then ...

Being French they were probably incestuous too.

By the way the Jews are not responsible for the death of Jesus Christ
simple since that spook was made up by the Council of Nicea in 312 , on
the basis of Judah bar Judah of Gamala aka Massada, the Zealot
stronghold .... and all that fraud is still going on after so many years
!

I don't care for any religion - I can't afford to waste any precious
uptime on viral memes.

I will reply to the rest later on in the night .... what I note though
is your incapacity to admit your own crimes at any time ... and this is
typical trait of criminals especially your kind of Criminals Indeed
never in the course of any conversation you have ever told me : Thank
you Sir for what you have done for the country ... of this as any of
your kind, you are completely unable ( except the very few I know )

I suppose you believe once a mine or a discovery is made, it's all so
evident that there is no merit in it at all ... it is not so Eduardo !

...by the way too what was your grand father doing in France during the
war, just for the heck of it ! Firing guns in the first line ? Tell me
!

Yeah he was. After surviving Gallipoli he went on to survive Pozieres and
then returned home. The army awarded him a medal for bravery in Gallipoli.
Hopefully he also impregnated some French maidens during his time in
France. If enough Australian soldiers had done so you wouldn't now be known
as a nation of surrendering monkeys.

See you in early morning hours then !

Night night Turdy.