JSH: They broke the rules

On Oct 3, 10:27*pm, JSH wrote:
I'm making it clear that academics in the mathematical field broke
some serious rules when it comes to research in their own field in
some of its biggest areas, which has proven to me that academics
across the board cannot simply be trusted.

This would certainly depend upon which ivory tower accreditation that
the particular institutionalized status quo finds itself enmeshed with
- the more radical approach depends upon whether or not there is a
conflict with some corporate interest might depend upon how many
bureaucratic tentacles have latched themselves to a particular
technological niche - the more tentacles involved in the corporate
directorships, the more entrenched the bureaucracy, and the more
"concrete" the pantheon, if you will, of interests you will be
offending or catering towards.

My guess is that the whole world shouldn't be THAT much interested in
either (1) dumbing down or (2) obfuscating a revolutionary technology
forever - even if just a few have already found for instance, a
propulsive alternative for either electrical, magnetic, gasoline, or
LOX/H2O2 fuel based alternative. Now it doesn't seem like there's too
much happening beyond the space shuttle (instrument racks are wayyyy
to small) - the shuttle doesn't get us out of earth orbit and beyond.

I mean that there's not anything scheduled for production right now
that would be a ten or twenty million person program that could reap
the benefits of building a massive orbital infrastructure - at least
to keep Americans busy and working for the next 100 years or so.

William Mook used to taolk about these things - emphasizing the
physics and engineering as well as some of the associated
infrastructure - but I'm not convinced that he had the where-with-all.

Just by posting ideas on the internet in places like sci.physics or
sci.space.policy never means that someone immediately receives
noticibility or the acceptance that he or shye should receive - unless
there is a TOTAL honesty in the way that the idea becomes implemented
industry-wide.

The reward system should ALWAYS remain intact ABOVE and BEYOND what
the transnationalist companies are willing to pay their non-American
accomplices, which means that American technical innovation should
ALWAYS remain one step ahead of the transnationalists.

Since most of honest America has become way too much the whipping boy
of the corporate trial lawyers, attorneys, and money-changing bankers,
environmentalists, progressive bureaucrats, and oil-phobe
transnationalists, it's time to reinvent America from the OUTSIDE IN.
(Notice I did not say "INSIDE OUT")

Our frontier for exploration that was once based upon roadway systems
must survive - mat least extraterrestrially - in order to change the
way that "employees" and "travelers" commute to their destinations.

Current methodologies employing roadway systems can still become
utilized for "utility" transport (anyone heard of a massive earth-to-
orbit, nuke-pulsed Orion concept developed nationally in the fifties,
as written about by G. Dyson in his book "Project Orion - The True
Story of the Atomic Spaceship")?

Commuters do not have to depend upon the currently antiquated kinds of
land-based commuter technology if a revolutionary viable alternative
becomes developed - at least extraterrerestrially.

Ergo, everything points to massive earth-to-orbit technology to get us
there. These are suprisingly simple ideas, but it would be involved
with changing the mindset of permanently having a nationally-wide
conglomorate of county-vested roadway infrastructures (i.e. Dept. of
Motor Vehicles, Dept. of Transportation, County Tax Commissioner,
Sheriff's Department, Police Departments, etc.) as well as having a
nationally wide conglomorate of airport-vested and "communication
highway" system (i.e. FAA, FCC, etc.) that becomes transformed by an
industry-wide reinvention of transferrable skill sets in these areas,
to a completely air-based, individual commuter transport system.

James Harris



American

On Oct 6, 12:51*pm, American wrote:
On Oct 3, 10:27*pm, JSH wrote: I'm making it clear that academics in the mathematical field broke
some serious rules when it comes to research in their own field in
some of its biggest areas, which has proven to me that academics
across the board cannot simply be trusted.

This would certainly depend upon which ivory tower accreditation that
the particular institutionalized status quo finds itself enmeshed with
- the more radical approach depends upon whether or not there is a
conflict with some corporate interest might depend upon how many
bureaucratic tentacles have latched themselves to a particular
technological niche - the more tentacles involved in the corporate
directorships, the more entrenched the bureaucracy, and the more
"concrete" the pantheon, if you will, of interests you will be
offending or catering towards.

My guess is that the whole world shouldn't be THAT much interested in
either (1) dumbing down or (2) obfuscating a revolutionary technology
forever - even if just a few have already found for instance, a
propulsive alternative for either electrical, magnetic, gasoline, or
LOX/H2O2 fuel based alternative. Now it doesn't seem like there's too
much happening beyond the space shuttle (instrument racks are wayyyy
to small) - the shuttle doesn't get us out of earth orbit and beyond.

I mean that there's not anything scheduled for production right now
that would be a ten or twenty million person program that could reap
the benefits of building a massive orbital infrastructure - at least
to keep Americans busy and working for the next 100 years or so.

William Mook used to taolk about these things - emphasizing the
physics and engineering as well as some of the associated
infrastructure - but I'm not convinced that he had the where-with-all.

Just by posting ideas on the internet in places like sci.physics or
sci.space.policy never means that someone immediately receives
noticibility or the acceptance that he or shye should receive - unless
there is a TOTAL honesty in the way that the idea becomes implemented
industry-wide.

The reward system should ALWAYS remain intact ABOVE and BEYOND what
the transnationalist companies are willing to pay their non-American
accomplices, which means that American technical innovation should
ALWAYS remain one step ahead of the transnationalists.

Since most of honest America has become way too much the whipping boy
of the corporate trial lawyers, attorneys, and money-changing bankers,
environmentalists, progressive bureaucrats, and oil-phobe
transnationalists, it's time to reinvent America from the OUTSIDE IN.
(Notice I did not say "INSIDE OUT")

Our frontier for exploration that was once based upon roadway systems
must survive - mat least extraterrestrially - in order to change the
way that "employees" and "travelers" commute to their destinations.

Current methodologies employing roadway systems can still become
utilized for "utility" transport (anyone heard of a massive earth-to-
orbit, nuke-pulsed Orion concept developed nationally in the fifties,
as written about by G. Dyson in his book "Project Orion - The True
Story of the Atomic Spaceship")?

Commuters do not have to depend upon the currently antiquated kinds of
land-based commuter technology if a revolutionary viable alternative
becomes developed - at least extraterrerestrially.

Ergo, everything points to massive earth-to-orbit technology to get us
there. These are suprisingly simple ideas, but it would be involved
with changing the mindset of permanently having a nationally-wide
conglomorate of county-vested roadway infrastructures (i.e. Dept. of
Motor Vehicles, Dept. of Transportation, County Tax Commissioner,
Sheriff's Department, Police Departments, etc.) as well as having a
nationally wide conglomorate of airport-vested and "communication
highway" system (i.e. FAA, FCC, etc.) that becomes transformed by an
industry-wide reinvention of transferrable skill sets in these areas,
to a completely air-based, individual commuter transport system.



James Harris

American

In fact, the idea for FTL propulsion has to find its "morphogenesis"
in some kind of quantum cosmology. The basis for constructing
a system of rotating/contracting/expanding field line
fractalizations, representing the north/south pole field
lines for a unique group of identities, for diverging group
renormalizations follows:

.......................or/either
........... and/both....|.......both/and
or/either..... ________|________either/or
........................|
........... and/both....|....both/and
.......................either/or

Each of the labels in the above graph represent a
crossection of yes/no identities for diverging group
renormalizations. This is an example of the Bohr
Principle of Complementarity. The observable which
poses the question; Is the momentum within an M range
of values (yes/no) represents 4 of the sectors in
symmetry with the position sectors, or is the position,
which represents the remaining 4 sectors, in symmetry
with the momentum sectors?

There is a term-in-term matrix that is used to
represent projective surface geometries, using the
complex projective space of points, lines, and planes,
that contains a geometry of automorphisms in P^n (r),
with their incidence relations, that is recoverable
from the Lie[2a] group PGL_(n+1) (r), as flags[3] with
maximal stabilizers of the subgroup B, which is
a quadric in P^4, similar to the above diagram,
but pictured as a root system of rank 2(Coxeter/Dynkin):

...................alpha + beta
............ beta.....|.......beta + 2alpha
.......- alpha________|________alpha
......................|
....- beta - 2alpha...|..........-beta
..................-alpha-beta

This is the subgroup which acts as the stabilizer of
the flag[3] for all the upper triangular matrices
that act in respect to a chosen basis, and are part
of the Borel subgroups. The Borel subgroups contain
parabolics, which is a prominent feature of Newton-
Cartan GR.

The subgroup G which stabilizes all the elements of
the flag matrix[3] e_i1, e_i2,...e_ip equals

T=

{(*................0)} = exp(_h_).
.....*............
..........*.......
0..............*..

The automorphism of this skeleton group matrix is
the Wehl group, that acts as permutations on the
coefficients of the matrices in T:

S_k {(e_i1,e_i2,...e_ip)}

The "skeleton" geometry S_k is an n-dimensional
projective geometry over the field of one element.
For n=2, the Skeleton geometry consists of 3
points and three lines, or a single cell of
the Sierpinski gasket!:


...\....../\....../\......./
....\.D./..\.D/..\D./
.....\../.U.\../.U.\./
......\/......\/.......\/
.......\....../\......./
........\.D./..\.D/
.........\../.U.\../
..........\/......\/
...........\....../
............\.D/
.............\../
..............\/

We can utilize the minimal ground state of the wave field
model by forming a harmony of group identities for
diverging group renormalizations of quantized force
w/macrotriangles and charged mass w/microtriangles.
(the lepton model is the reverse of the hadron model).

Notice that since there are 9 sectors total which can
represent a total of 9 active macro- and micro-triangles
which represent a separate matrix model for the internal
relationship between colored forces of the strong gluons,
photons of the electromagnetic force, and the weak
gluons of the weak force, two of the microtriangles that
must remain outside of the macrotriangle are anti-quarks
of either both 'up', both 'down', or one 'up' and one
'down'.

The purpose of two of the anti-quarks is to find two micro-
triangular non-anti-quarks with which to pair, in order
to become two neutral pions (mesons).

Within the larger picture of FTL propulsion, the
quadrupolarized disk/tube positronium pulse probe is
programmed to order the exchange rate for all positive,
negative, and neutral pions (mesons) for each virtually
induced off-C.G. Bi-IV polarization state (as induced
by both the circular waveguide's 'virtual' centroid
and the disk/tube surrounding the vessel's centroid).

A remaining microtriangle cross-connects to produce
a positive or negative pion (for the neutron and proton
respectively).

As pictured in the Sierpinski gasket above, the macro-
triangle would represent the force field containing 6
microtriangles of single spin for the bosons.

In relation to the 9 symmetric momentum/position
sectors described above, six consist of the
microtriangles and the other three consist of fractalized
self-similarities in the deterministic or non-deterministic
order of probability, that attach themselves to the macro-
triangle, consisting of one of three different species:

(1) Free fundamental anti-particle of microtriangles
within the constraining forces of a macrotriangle;

(2) Free fundamental particle of microtriangles
within the constraining forces of a macrotriangle;

(3) Free part microtriangles of a controlling whole of
macrotriangle.

Now comes the interesting part. These (3) differing
species of deterministic or non-deterministic orders
of probability for each of the "external" microtriangles
represents the "Euclideanization" of Quantum Field Theory
(QFT) via Penrose's twistor theory, that underlies the
mappable portion of our space time structure, using the
(3) species of deterministic or non-deterministic
(left brain/right brain) species of perception, with
the identity

z = x + i(y),

with x and y as the real parts, and i^2 = -1, and
the set of all such numbers

z_n = x_n + i(y_n)

denoted by C.

These numbers become represented on the complex plane,
and if a point at infinity is added - then the Riemann
Sphere[3a] can be projected onto a plane, together with the
point at infinity, to form the basis for positive and
negative frequencies at the northern and southern
hemispheres, respectively.

These three different directivities, combined with the
rotation operator for the Riemann sphere, are used in
developing the spherical harmonic resonance necessary,
that acts for each of the six degrees of freedom for
the diatomic molecule: translation (3 directivities),
rotation (2 directivities), and vibration (1 directivity),
where although rotation about the z axis does not represent
any change in nuclear coordinates, it DOES represent a
spin harmonization effect along a common C.G. axis for
all diatomic molecules in the vicinity of the z-axis
of rotation.


American

whether or not = whether or not whether
he or she - one, who