|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How early can a scrub be decided ?
The status report shows a 60% change of weather not permitting a launch
on saturday and similar stats for sunday. As I recall, the decision is usually made during the t-9 minutes hold. Are there rules/procedures that cause NASA to decide on a no-go much earlier ? For instance, if the weather service predicts a 90% chance of weather prohibiting launch, would NASA still go ahead with the filling of the ET (a rather expensive endeavour and one which is stressful to the aluminium and foam) ? Or is the only time NASA might look at weather is during the T-9 hold because ot is only then that weather becomes part of a go/no-go to proceed with resumption of countdown ? Also, since the shuttle launch procedures were written back in the late 1970s, would it be fair to assume that weather prediction accuracy has improved significantly ? Does a "60% chance of weather violating rules" 24 hours before launch in 2006 provide significantly more authoritative data than back in 1982 ? If, 3 or 4 days before a launch, they predict a hurricane may hit/skirt the launch site on the launch day, I take it NASA would postpone the launch and batten down the hatches to prepare the stack to widthstand the storm ? Is there a defined "line" above which NASA postpones the flight, and below wich NASA continues with all preparations in the hopes that 9 minutes before launch, the clouds might hopefully be far enough away ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How early can a scrub be decided ?
John Doe wrote in :
The status report shows a 60% change of weather not permitting a launch on saturday and similar stats for sunday. As I recall, the decision is usually made during the t-9 minutes hold. Are there rules/procedures that cause NASA to decide on a no-go much earlier ? For instance, if the weather service predicts a 90% chance of weather prohibiting launch, would NASA still go ahead with the filling of the ET (a rather expensive endeavour and one which is stressful to the aluminium and foam) ? I've seen NASA scrub a launch at the tanking meeting. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How early can a scrub be decided ?
FYI
As of last night, it was 60%, that has changed as of 10am this morning and has held all day to 20%. If anyone is heading down.. Look for me at Indian River!!!! WOHOOO! Jorge R. Frank wrote: John Doe wrote in : The status report shows a 60% change of weather not permitting a launch on saturday and similar stats for sunday. As I recall, the decision is usually made during the t-9 minutes hold. Are there rules/procedures that cause NASA to decide on a no-go much earlier ? For instance, if the weather service predicts a 90% chance of weather prohibiting launch, would NASA still go ahead with the filling of the ET (a rather expensive endeavour and one which is stressful to the aluminium and foam) ? I've seen NASA scrub a launch at the tanking meeting. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How early can a scrub be decided ?
On 30 Jun 2006 19:57:17 -0700, "Signalman1968"
wrote: FYI As of last night, it was 60%, that has changed as of 10am this morning and has held all day to 20%. I'm not sure where you got that. NASA is still saying the weather forecast is 60% no-go. http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/podca...ranscript.html Of course, I was at the STS-93 launch the night NASA promised "100% chance of good weather." They scrubbed because of lightning storms offshore. You can never tell. Good luck tomorrow! Brian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How early can a scrub be decided ?
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:17:12 -0400, John Doe wrote:
Does a "60% chance of weather violating rules" 24 hours before launch in 2006 provide significantly more authoritative data than back in 1982 ? Not if the forecasts are anything like the ones for where I live now (Northern Alabama). Here, a 60% to 80 % chance of rain for several days in a row usually means it might be overcast and windy, but will be completely dry. Yesterday, I think we had a zero chance of rain and had a thunderstorm and heavy downpour in the evening. We definitely needed the rain. Sometimes, I think they have gotten over sophisticated in trying to predict weather with complex computer models and are actually less accurate in some physical locations. I was raised in Macon Georgia (near Robins Air Force Base) and have lived in Tallahassee Florida among other places. Maybe the weather was just easier to predict in Middle Georgia and in Florida. Usually, if you just reported afternoon thundershowers during summer, it would be hard to miss. People (including a friend of mine) were always crashing private planes in South Georgia because of the sudden thunderstorms. When I lived in Northern California at around 2000 - 2400 foot altitude, they could have gotten by with 2 predictions, rain or snow/ice almost all winter transitioning to hot and completely dry all the summer. It was strange to be able to go a year without hearing thunder. The snow predictions were kind of cute. Since the town climbed a few hundred feet from one end to another and the altitude above which they expected snow often fell within that range, they'd just say what major cross street the snow was supposed to start at. Like you, I'm worried about all that tanking and de-tanking of Cryo fuels, especially after they were afraid to do a tanking test to check those fuel level switches in the ET, because they were concerned about an extra tanking meaning possibly extra foam cracking. I was a bit surprised they tried to launch this early in the month since there had been some talk that the lighting conditions to get good pictures during ET separation wouldn't be all that great until the 4th or 5th. -- David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Horizons Payload Gets High Marks on Early Tests | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 30th 06 01:38 AM |
New Horizons Payload Gets High Marks on Early Tests | [email protected] | News | 0 | March 30th 06 01:38 AM |
Asteroids Caused the Early Inner Solar System Cataclysm | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 15th 05 07:38 PM |
Early Arctic Thaw Could Have Chilling Effect | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 30th 03 01:23 AM |