#1
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
Dear Friends.
No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One & First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones. Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan. My the best wishes. P. S. + one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote:
Dear Friends. No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One & First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones. Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan. My the best wishes. P. S. + one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. -- SarK0Y Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off the pot. Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
On Jan 12, 6:31*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote: Dear Friends. No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One & First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones. Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan. My the best wishes. P. S. + one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. -- SarK0Y Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off the pot. *Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful? *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - congress should of created a income stream from space from day 1. license all products from space related industries for a 10% commision. to encourage space stuff today make all space businesses tax free for 10 years..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Space Access Lottery [was Public letter:]
The lottery approach to space tourism is an interesting one.
It would be a good way to generate nearly free publicity for an operation such as Virgin Galactic and possibly Bigelow Aerospace. Would be interesting to see these offered as travel prizes on games shows as well. Will we live to see the day? Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
first of the all, nasa could provide suborbital flights (conventional rocket + capsule). it has cost of some cents & maximal safety rate.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dave, private companies have chosen hard scheme to realize. at the start, proven ways have to be used to down R&D cost, + makes systems maximally safe. i see we need public movement to push Space Industry forward. Now, Time has been wasted 4 impasse projects
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
On Jan 12, 6:15*am, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:31*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote: Dear Friends. No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One & First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones. Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan. My the best wishes. P. S. + one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. -- SarK0Y Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off the pot. *Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful? *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - congress should of created a income stream from space from day 1. license all products from space related industries for a 10% commision. to encourage space stuff today make all space businesses tax free for 10 years..... I would certainly go with that, or something quite similar. There's a list of could have been(s), should have been(s). Off-world metallicity is right up there on top of that list. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
On 01/11/2012 09:02 PM, SarK0Y wrote:
Dear Friends. No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One& First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones. It's illegal for private companies or individuals to run lotteries. + one wonderful& useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. Incorrect. Any revenue raised by any federal agency (including NASA) goes straight into the Treasury. It does not mean NASA will get more money. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
It's illegal for private companies or individuals to run lotteries. Well yes however.... It is not illegal for a private company to donate a prize to a charity or public organization that holds a lottery as a fund raiser. Happens all the time. That prize could be a ticket for two to ride on a Virgin Galactic excursion. Would not raise funds directly for VG, but great publicity (read free advertising) for them. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Public letter:
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:02 PM, SarK0Y wrote: + one wonderful& useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA. Incorrect. Any revenue raised by any federal agency (including NASA) goes straight into the Treasury. It does not mean NASA will get more money. Agreed. You cannot as a private citizen even write a check to NASA. However the politicians managed to carve out an exception for themselves when it comes to campaign financing. Hence the check-off on your 1040. Too bad space exploration cannot get a check-off... Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pseudo-military and cameras in the streets in the UK, imperialistcrowd, big important public and the public militia, radical extremism of today(news story on UK cameras in the streets) | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 12th 08 04:24 PM |
May the public militia leave? Ceausescu's government and secretgovernment is gone. Public militia is a problem of the 21st Century and bigbrother cameras in the UK. Think what education means, think that some grew uponly with repression in culture, w | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 12th 08 04:42 AM |
Ed Lu letter from space #last letter | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 29th 03 06:28 PM |
Ed Lu letter from space #13 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 2 | October 28th 03 10:35 PM |
Ed Lu Letter from space #11 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | September 10th 03 02:53 PM |