A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Public letter:



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 12th 12, 03:02 AM
SarK0Y SarK0Y is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
Default Public letter:

Dear Friends.

No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future & current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One & First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers. Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to advance than Just to search wealthy ones.

Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan.

My the best wishes.

P. S.

+ one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.
Ads
  #2  
Old January 12th 12, 11:31 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,176
Default Public letter:

On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote:
Dear Friends.

No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future
& current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One &
First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space
tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but
common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers.
Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but
fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to
sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to
advance than Just to search wealthy ones.

Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space
Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan.

My the best wishes.

P. S.

+ one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be
self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.

--
SarK0Y


Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off
the pot. Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting
the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful?

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

  #3  
Old January 12th 12, 02:15 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Public letter:

On Jan 12, 6:31*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote:





Dear Friends.


No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future
& current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One &
First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space
tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but
common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers.
Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but
fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to
sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to
advance than Just to search wealthy ones.


Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space
Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan.


My the best wishes.


P. S.


+ one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be
self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.


--
SarK0Y


Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off
the pot. *Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting
the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


congress should of created a income stream from space from day 1.

license all products from space related industries for a 10%
commision.

to encourage space stuff today make all space businesses tax free for
10 years.....
  #4  
Old January 12th 12, 05:09 PM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Space Access Lottery [was Public letter:]

The lottery approach to space tourism is an interesting one.

It would be a good way to generate nearly free publicity for an operation such
as Virgin Galactic and possibly Bigelow Aerospace.

Would be interesting to see these offered as travel prizes on games shows as well.

Will we live to see the day?

Dave
  #5  
Old January 12th 12, 09:15 PM
SarK0Y SarK0Y is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
Default

first of the all, nasa could provide suborbital flights (conventional rocket + capsule). it has cost of some cents & maximal safety rate.
  #6  
Old January 12th 12, 09:28 PM
SarK0Y SarK0Y is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
Default

Dave, private companies have chosen hard scheme to realize. at the start, proven ways have to be used to down R&D cost, + makes systems maximally safe. i see we need public movement to push Space Industry forward. Now, Time has been wasted 4 impasse projects
  #7  
Old January 13th 12, 06:35 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,176
Default Public letter:

On Jan 12, 6:15*am, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:31*am, Brad Guth wrote:









On Jan 11, 7:02*pm, SarK0Y wrote:


Dear Friends.


No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future
& current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One &
First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space
tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but
common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers.
Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but
fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to
sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to
advance than Just to search wealthy ones.


Aforesaid text is only smallest part of the strategy to turn Space
Industry from ugly duck to blossoming Swan.


My the best wishes.


P. S.


+ one wonderful & useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be
self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.


--
SarK0Y


Decades ago our NASA was being told by some of us to **** or get off
the pot. *Where the hell were you and your big-ass ideas of getting
the poor and middle class to further finance the rich and powerful?


*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


congress should of created a income stream from space from day 1.

license all products from space related industries for a 10%
commision.

to encourage space stuff today make all space businesses tax free for
10 years.....


I would certainly go with that, or something quite similar.

There's a list of could have been(s), should have been(s). Off-world
metallicity is right up there on top of that list.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
  #8  
Old January 14th 12, 03:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default Public letter:

On 01/11/2012 09:02 PM, SarK0Y wrote:
Dear Friends.

No too big secret that NASA has gotten toughest question to fund future
& current projects. I’d like to offer you game-changing strategy: One&
First among the Key Factors is to become financially independent, space
tourism has really great potential to be first having extra incomes, but
common mistake of start-ups like SpaceX is the way to excite customers.
Ticket to Space is too expensive even for far not poor personas, but
fortunately this obstacle can be broken through with lottery schemes to
sell tickets + that way makes possible to get many times more income to
advance than Just to search wealthy ones.


It's illegal for private companies or individuals to run lotteries.

+ one wonderful& useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be
self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.


Incorrect. Any revenue raised by any federal agency (including NASA)
goes straight into the Treasury. It does not mean NASA will get more money.
  #9  
Old January 14th 12, 05:57 AM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Public letter:

Jorge R. Frank wrote:
It's illegal for private companies or individuals to run lotteries.


Well yes however....

It is not illegal for a private company to donate a prize to a charity or
public organization that holds a lottery as a fund raiser. Happens all the time.

That prize could be a ticket for two to ride on a Virgin Galactic excursion.

Would not raise funds directly for VG, but great publicity (read free
advertising) for them.

Dave
  #10  
Old January 14th 12, 06:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Public letter:

Jorge R. Frank wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:02 PM, SarK0Y wrote:
+ one wonderful& useful moment must be mentioned: the more NASA will be
self-funded, the more money from government will be given to NASA.


Incorrect. Any revenue raised by any federal agency (including NASA)
goes straight into the Treasury. It does not mean NASA will get more money.


Agreed. You cannot as a private citizen even write a check to NASA.

However the politicians managed to carve out an exception for themselves when
it comes to campaign financing. Hence the check-off on your 1040. Too bad
space exploration cannot get a check-off...

Dave
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pseudo-military and cameras in the streets in the UK, imperialistcrowd, big important public and the public militia, radical extremism of today(news story on UK cameras in the streets) gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 12th 08 04:24 PM
May the public militia leave? Ceausescu's government and secretgovernment is gone. Public militia is a problem of the 21st Century and bigbrother cameras in the UK. Think what education means, think that some grew uponly with repression in culture, w gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 12th 08 04:42 AM
Ed Lu letter from space #last letter Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 October 29th 03 06:28 PM
Ed Lu letter from space #13 Jacques van Oene Space Station 2 October 28th 03 10:35 PM
Ed Lu Letter from space #11 Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 September 10th 03 02:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.