another amazing and useful idea: the "Orion's precision LAKElanding" system

..

why perform only a "land" OR "sea" landing?

the Orion may land (also) on an (artificial) LAKE specially built at
KSC:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html

..

On May 7, 9:11 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

why perform only a "land" OR "sea" landing?

the Orion may land (also) on an (artificial) LAKE specially built at
KSC:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html



It won't work.

1. The propellers and motors can't be protected from entry
2. A round parachute can't be controlled
3. The orientation of the capsule can't be controlled

wrote in message
...
On May 7, 9:11 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

why perform only a "land" OR "sea" landing?

the Orion may land (also) on an (artificial) LAKE specially built at
KSC:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html



It won't work.

1. The propellers and motors can't be protected from entry
2. A round parachute can't be controlled
3. The orientation of the capsule can't be controlled

Why do you keep replying to this loon? None of his "ideas" are both good
and original.

Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein

..

today I've updated my "Orion's precision LAKE landing at KSC" article

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html

with my idea of an "ON LAND (hundreds times reusable) inflatable
airbags landing system"

of course, build a "lake of airbags" may cost several million$ but may
allow to SAVE several HUNDREDS million$ to develop the LAND landing
Orion's airbags and (most important) SAVE (also) over 1.5 mT on the
(now overweighed) Orion's mass, while giving (both) LAND (or LAKE) and
SEA landing options to the new capsule!

..

On May 9, 3:56 am, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

today I've updated my "Orion's precision LAKE landing at KSC" article

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html

with my idea of an "ON LAND (hundreds times reusable) inflatable
airbags landing system"

of course, build a "lake of airbags" may cost several million$ but may
allow to SAVE several HUNDREDS million$ to develop the LAND landing
Orion's airbags and (most important) SAVE (also) over 1.5 mT on the
(now overweighed) Orion's mass, while giving (both) LAND (or LAKE) and
SEA landing options to the new capsule!
.

As usual, you've got good ideas and better methods than most. But
sadly, you're not DARPA/Jewish enough. Get it?
.. - Brad Guth

On May 7, 6:11 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

why perform only a "land" OR "sea" landing?

the Orion may land (also) on an (artificial) LAKE specially built at
KSC:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html

.

As per usual, you've got those really good ideas and better methods
than most. But ever so sadly, you're not DARPA/Jewish enough. Get
it?
.. - Brad Guth