Got that whatever BC Moon ?

"TheEnigmaMachine" wrote in message


Isn't that more of the same old jewspeak, or is it the Third Reich
speaking? (one and the same, arnt they)
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"captain." wrote in message
news:QpFvh.18601$Fd.3101@edtnps90

*snicker*

My God, Jews will actually laugh at absolutely anything that's sick,
including Christ on a stick.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:893d8085ad5ec86475aebffa00ed4aac.49644@mygate .mailgate.org...
"captain." wrote in message
news:QpFvh.18601$Fd.3101@edtnps90

*snicker*

My God, Jews will actually laugh at absolutely anything that's sick,
including Christ on a stick.
-
Brad Guth


quit acting like an intolerant redneck and read this:
http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01...ts-atmosphere/

this is real science and also really interesting.
try to learn instead of acting like a run of the mill anti-jewish usenet
kook.

"captain." wrote in message
news:RJbxh.27883$Fd.27578@edtnps90

You smelly old fart. Is this what you silly folks call "real science"?
"Artist illustration of an extrasolar planet"

A fully subjective depiction of whatever's so goddamn freaking far away,
in that no matters what it simply doesn't matter. Is this the best
faith based infomercial crapolla you've got to share?

Particle size analyzers

http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01...ts-atmosphere/
http://www.malvern.com/?gclid=CPH7l5...FSNxYAodMEMC0Q
Wy isn't this fine group of supposed wizards and by way of their fancy
instruments looking at Venus, or for that matter looking at the
extensive atmosphere of our salty moon?

Good freaking grief and Christ almighty on another stick. I've got
quality 36 look/pixel SAR composite images of the Venusian surface that
are for real and more than clean enough to see whatever a few smart ETs
or local Venusians are up to, and the image resolution is more than a
few hundred billion fold if not multi-trillion fold better off than
anything of "HD 209458b" that's 150 some odd light years (1,419.1e12 km)
away.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:3f2b985dedfcd6901f9cecf04baa0716.49644@mygate .mailgate.org...
"captain." wrote in message
news:RJbxh.27883$Fd.27578@edtnps90

You smelly old fart. Is this what you silly folks call "real science"?
"Artist illustration of an extrasolar planet"


you appear incapable of making even one post that doesn't make you sound
like a nut. would you have prefered the real picture which would have been a
small dot with a bright background (in visible light)?

flush

"captain." wrote in message
news:KU5yh.35829$Oa.32513@edtnps82
you appear incapable of making even one post that doesn't make you sound
like a nut. would you have prefered the real picture which would have been a
small dot with a bright background (in visible light)?

"Captain Adam" wrote in message

Most of it is probably true. The fact is we are not alone in the universe.
The universe is full of life forms we can not see because they exist in
another dimension.

And I quote: "they exist in another dimension" ??????

And to further imagine, you're the one thinking that I'm being weird
about other life existing/coexisting on Venus, or perhaps you don't like
my notions of relocating our moon our to Earth L1.

Actually yes about "HD 209458b", whereas I would have liked seeing a
fully AI (3D if possible) computer simulation of such a massive
extrasolar planet as "HD 209458b", rather than yet another fully
subjective human infomercial worth of over-blown hypology of yet another
mainstream hocus-pocus worth of eye popping candy and spendy column
inches, in order to impress us into thinking that such extreme SETI or
other far-out forms of astronomy science actually has some hard core
worth to humanity, or on behalf of our badly failing environment. (which
of course it does not)

Along with fill-in lighting (similar to most of our NASA/Apollo Kodak
moments) from that apparent nearby second sun, and otherwise showing us
that impressive 20,000 km thick atmosphere none the less (many other
simulated depictions of a strong comet like trail), whereas others
having given a more realistic 0.1r atmosphere apparently don't count.

http://www.universetoday.com/wp-cont...extrasolar.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris_(planet)
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/index_en.html
"An evaporating extra-solar planet"
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/LaUneArticle_en.html
In yet another perfectly honest analogy, "HD 209458 b" is apparently a
another example of a captured planet, much like a few planets if not
most all within our solar system. Oddly, we seem to know more about the
composition of its atmosphere than we do of whatever's in orbit about
either of the extremely nearby Sirius stars, or even that of the
atmosphere around Venus.

We look at Venus along with its 0.025r thick atmosphere as representing
a fairly crisp black dot, or little old Mercury as a near micro-dot of a
planet as it passes directly in front of the sun, whereas such a much
larger exoplanet shouldn't be all that impossible to image or at least
computer simulate as simply offering a very much larger and apparently
fast moving black dot, instead of all the fancy hocus-pocus eye candy
and infomercial hype.

In other words, if team SETI were given an extra tax free trillion of
our hard earned bucks to blow on whatever in the next decade, and even
if the best of everything SETI came true; what exactly would that
investment of time and loot buy for the lower 99.9% of humanity, and for
the countless generations from this same lower 99.9% of a mostly
servitude worth of humanity to come?

Or, are you folks only pleased as punch with yourself if merely the
upper most 0.1% of humanity become tax-free multi billionaires? (which
of course they'll need to be, since by then a given unit of their badly
inflated fuel/energy will likely have become worth $1000/gallon)

I guess this also represents that you and others of your kind haven't
come up with that 10,500 BC or whatever BC moon of ours.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:3f2b985dedfcd6901f9cecf04baa0716.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

I may have to try reposting this one again, because, before I'd been
getting the Mailgate "Status: Your message has been refused" whenever
posting direct to the following message, as though I was being
remote/robo stealth moderated to death. Apparently our "captain" is a
Usenet insider spook/mole after all.

"captain." wrote in message
news:KU5yh.35829$Oa.32513@edtnps82
you appear incapable of making even one post that doesn't make you sound
like a nut. would you have prefered the real picture which would have been a
small dot with a bright background (in visible light)?

"Captain Adam" wrote in message

Most of it is probably true. The fact is we are not alone in the universe.
The universe is full of life forms we can not see because they exist in
another dimension.

And shall I quote: "they exist in another dimension" ??????

And to further imagine, you're the one thinking that I'm being weird
about other life existing/coexisting on Venus, or perhaps you simply
don't like my notions of relocating our moon out to Earth L1.

Actually yes about "HD 209458b", whereas I would have liked seeing a
fully AI (3D if possible) computer simulation of such a massive
extrasolar planet as "HD 209458b", rather than yet another fully
subjective human infomercial worth of over-blown hypology of yet another
mainstream hocus-pocus worth of eye popping candy and spendy column
inches, in order to impress us into thinking that such extreme SETI or
other far-out forms of astronomy science actually has some hard core
worth to humanity, or on behalf of our badly failing environment. (which
of course it does not)

Along with fill-in lighting (similar to most of our NASA/Apollo Kodak
moments) from that apparent nearby second sun, and otherwise showing us
that impressive 20,000 km thick atmosphere none the less (many other
simulated depictions of a strong comet like trail), whereas others
having given a more realistic 0.1r atmosphere apparently don't count.

http://www.universetoday.com/wp-cont...extrasolar.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris_(planet)
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/index_en.html
"An evaporating extra-solar planet"
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/LaUneArticle_en.html
In yet another perfectly honest analogy, "HD 209458 b" is apparently a
another example of a captured planet, much like a few planets if not
most all within our solar system. Oddly, we seem to know more about the
composition of its atmosphere than we do of whatever's in orbit about
either of the extremely nearby Sirius stars, or even that of the
atmosphere around Venus.

We look at Venus along with its 0.025r thick atmosphere as representing
a fairly crisp black dot, or little old Mercury as a near micro-dot of a
planet as it passes directly in front of the sun, whereas such a much
larger exoplanet shouldn't be all that impossible to image or at least
computer simulate as simply offering a very much larger and apparently
fast moving black dot, instead of all the fancy hocus-pocus eye candy
and infomercial hype.

In other words, if team SETI were given an extra tax free trillion of
our hard earned bucks to blow on whatever in the next decade, and even
if the best of everything SETI came true; what exactly would that
investment of time and loot buy for the lower 99.9% of humanity, and for
the countless generations from this same lower 99.9% of a mostly
servitude worth of humanity to come?

Or, are you folks only pleased as punch with yourself if merely the
upper most 0.1% of humanity become tax-free multi billionaires? (which
of course they'll need to be, since by then a given unit of their badly
inflated fuel/energy will likely have become worth $1000/gallon)

I guess this also represents that you and others of your kind haven't
actually come up with that 10,500 BC or whatever BC moon of ours.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

i rest my point.

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b0d7ba459dc599b3f718e146daf5a120.49644@mygate .mailgate.org...
"captain." wrote in message
news:KU5yh.35829$Oa.32513@edtnps82
you appear incapable of making even one post that doesn't make you sound
like a nut. would you have prefered the real picture which would have
been a
small dot with a bright background (in visible light)?

"Captain Adam" wrote in message

Most of it is probably true. The fact is we are not alone in the
universe.
The universe is full of life forms we can not see because they exist in
another dimension.

And I quote: "they exist in another dimension" ??????

And to further imagine, you're the one thinking that I'm being weird
about other life existing/coexisting on Venus, or perhaps you don't like
my notions of relocating our moon our to Earth L1.

Actually yes about "HD 209458b", whereas I would have liked seeing a
fully AI (3D if possible) computer simulation of such a massive
extrasolar planet as "HD 209458b", rather than yet another fully
subjective human infomercial worth of over-blown hypology of yet another
mainstream hocus-pocus worth of eye popping candy and spendy column
inches, in order to impress us into thinking that such extreme SETI or
other far-out forms of astronomy science actually has some hard core
worth to humanity, or on behalf of our badly failing environment. (which
of course it does not)

Along with fill-in lighting (similar to most of our NASA/Apollo Kodak
moments) from that apparent nearby second sun, and otherwise showing us
that impressive 20,000 km thick atmosphere none the less (many other
simulated depictions of a strong comet like trail), whereas others
having given a more realistic 0.1r atmosphere apparently don't count.

http://www.universetoday.com/wp-cont...extrasolar.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris_(planet)
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/index_en.html
"An evaporating extra-solar planet"
http://www2.iap.fr/exoplanetes/LaUneArticle_en.html
In yet another perfectly honest analogy, "HD 209458 b" is apparently a
another example of a captured planet, much like a few planets if not
most all within our solar system. Oddly, we seem to know more about the
composition of its atmosphere than we do of whatever's in orbit about
either of the extremely nearby Sirius stars, or even that of the
atmosphere around Venus.

We look at Venus along with its 0.025r thick atmosphere as representing
a fairly crisp black dot, or little old Mercury as a near micro-dot of a
planet as it passes directly in front of the sun, whereas such a much
larger exoplanet shouldn't be all that impossible to image or at least
computer simulate as simply offering a very much larger and apparently
fast moving black dot, instead of all the fancy hocus-pocus eye candy
and infomercial hype.

In other words, if team SETI were given an extra tax free trillion of
our hard earned bucks to blow on whatever in the next decade, and even
if the best of everything SETI came true; what exactly would that
investment of time and loot buy for the lower 99.9% of humanity, and for
the countless generations from this same lower 99.9% of a mostly
servitude worth of humanity to come?

Or, are you folks only pleased as punch with yourself if merely the
upper most 0.1% of humanity become tax-free multi billionaires? (which
of course they'll need to be, since by then a given unit of their badly
inflated fuel/energy will likely have become worth $1000/gallon)

I guess this also represents that you and others of your kind haven't
come up with that 10,500 BC or whatever BC moon of ours.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"captain." wrote in message
news:BWYyh.44422$Y6.253@edtnps89

i rest my point.

You had an actual on-topic point?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Probe will go to Phobos to bring back samples of Brad's brain...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6324923.stm

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:51444aaae8eeefab093b433dd32c90db.49644@mygate .mailgate.org...
"captain." wrote in message
news:BWYyh.44422$Y6.253@edtnps89

i rest my point.

You had an actual on-topic point?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG