A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SpaceX has plans--BIG plans



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old August 11th 10, 04:53 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On Aug 9, 12:02*am, wrote:

This was back when SAGE was already operational


You know, it's a terrible pity that those SAGE AN/FSQ-7 computers
couldn't do all the things in real life that they could on TV...

John Savard
  #62  
Old August 11th 10, 04:55 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On Aug 9, 9:51*pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
His job in the event of a Soviet invasion was to fire the pistol into the
disk pack and let centripetal force do the rest.


The lack of centripetal force induced by the damage done by the bullet
would do the damage, not the presence of centripetal force.

Or the interaction between the lack of centripetal force and the
inertia of the parts of the disk that would seek to continue in a
straight line instead of circular (and hence accelerated) motion.

Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it
is centrifugal force which does the *damage*.

John Savard
  #63  
Old August 11th 10, 12:37 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Quadibloc wrote:
Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it
is centrifugal force which does the *damage*.


I hate to disagree with you (no, actually I like to do it, as I think
you are a real loon) but having been thrown off of a spinning metal
merry-go-round by centrifugal force as a kid, I don't think the force is
fictitious.
At least it didn't feel fictitious as I slid out from the center and
grabbed the support rails while screaming before hitting the ground and
rolling end-over-end.

Pat
  #64  
Old August 12th 10, 03:57 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)[_1103_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

Quadibloc wrote:
On Aug 9, 12:02 am, wrote:

This was back when SAGE was already operational


You know, it's a terrible pity that those SAGE AN/FSQ-7 computers
couldn't do all the things in real life that they could on TV...

John Savard


On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive.



--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


  #65  
Old August 12th 10, 08:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On 8/11/2010 6:57 PM, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:


On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive.


It was a pretty strange concept; basically you turned the interceptor
into a RPV with the pilot riding along to make sure all the systems were
operating correctly.
(Cut to image of the pilot cowering as he realizes that his aircraft is
about to fire its Genie nuclear warheaded rockets.)
For anyone reading this that doesn't know about SAGE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi_Au...nd_Environment
This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation
destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C
by disrupting the ionosphere.
It would never work in a world where you had Spartan ABMs detonating
above the atmosphere to destroy incoming incoming Soviet warheads.

Pat
  #67  
Old August 12th 10, 11:32 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans



Pat Flannery wrote:
On 8/11/2010 6:57 PM, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:


On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive.


It was a pretty strange concept; basically you turned the interceptor
into a RPV with the pilot riding along to make sure all the systems were
operating correctly.
(Cut to image of the pilot cowering as he realizes that his aircraft is
about to fire its Genie nuclear warheaded rockets.)
For anyone reading this that doesn't know about SAGE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi_Au...nd_Environment
This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation
destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C
by disrupting the ionosphere.
It would never work in a world where you had Spartan ABMs detonating
above the atmosphere to destroy incoming incoming Soviet warheads.

Pat


Genies didn't have as many safeguards against unauthorized use as
would be expected for a nuclear weapon, but at least they couldn't be
detonated on the ground (had to be traveling at least 1100 MPH - that
speed may be wrong). I never saw a pilot show fear due to the
weapons, but a few ground crew members would suddenly start shaking,
crying, or praying when they got near them.
  #69  
Old August 13th 10, 02:31 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On Aug 11, 5:37*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Quadibloc wrote:

Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it
is centrifugal force which does the *damage*.


I hate to disagree with you (no, actually I like to do it, as I think
you are a real loon) but having been thrown off of a spinning metal
merry-go-round by centrifugal force as a kid, I don't think the force is
fictitious.
At least it didn't feel fictitious as I slid out from the center and
grabbed the support rails while screaming before hitting the ground and
rolling end-over-end.


What happened to you wasn't fictitious. But it wasn't a force that
threw you off the merry-go-round. It was just your own momentum, no
longer holding you in and forcing you to remain in accelerated
circular motion.

John Savard
  #70  
Old August 13th 10, 02:33 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default SpaceX has plans--BIG plans

On Aug 12, 1:05*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation
destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C
by disrupting the ionosphere.


At least it wouldn't have fried the computers. The AN/FSQ-7 was built
from vacuum tubes, after all.

John Savard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next plans for AMSAT: P3E and P5A Jim Kingdon Space Science Misc 2 October 5th 04 07:20 AM
New plans not too dissimilar to SEI? Steen Eiler Jørgensen Policy 10 January 21st 04 06:38 PM
Moon plans Jim Kingdon Space Science Misc 0 January 14th 04 11:03 PM
MIR plans Nicolas Deault Space Station 6 November 26th 03 05:50 AM
New vehicle from old plans? gene Space Shuttle 19 September 12th 03 03:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.