![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 12:02*am, wrote:
This was back when SAGE was already operational You know, it's a terrible pity that those SAGE AN/FSQ-7 computers couldn't do all the things in real life that they could on TV... John Savard |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 9:51*pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
His job in the event of a Soviet invasion was to fire the pistol into the disk pack and let centripetal force do the rest. The lack of centripetal force induced by the damage done by the bullet would do the damage, not the presence of centripetal force. Or the interaction between the lack of centripetal force and the inertia of the parts of the disk that would seek to continue in a straight line instead of circular (and hence accelerated) motion. Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it is centrifugal force which does the *damage*. John Savard |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Quadibloc wrote:
Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it is centrifugal force which does the *damage*. I hate to disagree with you (no, actually I like to do it, as I think you are a real loon) but having been thrown off of a spinning metal merry-go-round by centrifugal force as a kid, I don't think the force is fictitious. At least it didn't feel fictitious as I slid out from the center and grabbed the support rails while screaming before hitting the ground and rolling end-over-end. Pat |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quadibloc wrote:
On Aug 9, 12:02 am, wrote: This was back when SAGE was already operational You know, it's a terrible pity that those SAGE AN/FSQ-7 computers couldn't do all the things in real life that they could on TV... John Savard On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive. -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/11/2010 6:57 PM, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive. It was a pretty strange concept; basically you turned the interceptor into a RPV with the pilot riding along to make sure all the systems were operating correctly. (Cut to image of the pilot cowering as he realizes that his aircraft is about to fire its Genie nuclear warheaded rockets.) For anyone reading this that doesn't know about SAGE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi_Au...nd_Environment This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C by disrupting the ionosphere. It would never work in a world where you had Spartan ABMs detonating above the atmosphere to destroy incoming incoming Soviet warheads. Pat |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pat Flannery wrote: On 8/11/2010 6:57 PM, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote: On the othher hand, what they could do was pretty impressive. It was a pretty strange concept; basically you turned the interceptor into a RPV with the pilot riding along to make sure all the systems were operating correctly. (Cut to image of the pilot cowering as he realizes that his aircraft is about to fire its Genie nuclear warheaded rockets.) For anyone reading this that doesn't know about SAGE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi_Au...nd_Environment This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C by disrupting the ionosphere. It would never work in a world where you had Spartan ABMs detonating above the atmosphere to destroy incoming incoming Soviet warheads. Pat Genies didn't have as many safeguards against unauthorized use as would be expected for a nuclear weapon, but at least they couldn't be detonated on the ground (had to be traveling at least 1100 MPH - that speed may be wrong). I never saw a pilot show fear due to the weapons, but a few ground crew members would suddenly start shaking, crying, or praying when they got near them. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 5:37*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Quadibloc wrote: Or, if you will forgive my daring to speak of a _fictitious_ force, it is centrifugal force which does the *damage*. I hate to disagree with you (no, actually I like to do it, as I think you are a real loon) but having been thrown off of a spinning metal merry-go-round by centrifugal force as a kid, I don't think the force is fictitious. At least it didn't feel fictitious as I slid out from the center and grabbed the support rails while screaming before hitting the ground and rolling end-over-end. What happened to you wasn't fictitious. But it wasn't a force that threw you off the merry-go-round. It was just your own momentum, no longer holding you in and forcing you to remain in accelerated circular motion. John Savard |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 1:05*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
This sounds great till the first EMP-generating nuclear detonation destroys the communications link between the interceptors and their C&C by disrupting the ionosphere. At least it wouldn't have fried the computers. The AN/FSQ-7 was built from vacuum tubes, after all. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Next plans for AMSAT: P3E and P5A | Jim Kingdon | Space Science Misc | 2 | October 5th 04 07:20 AM |
New plans not too dissimilar to SEI? | Steen Eiler Jørgensen | Policy | 10 | January 21st 04 06:38 PM |
Moon plans | Jim Kingdon | Space Science Misc | 0 | January 14th 04 11:03 PM |
MIR plans | Nicolas Deault | Space Station | 6 | November 26th 03 05:50 AM |
New vehicle from old plans? | gene | Space Shuttle | 19 | September 12th 03 03:50 PM |