Clean, Space Shuttle mission ! Liberals bummed out.....

In article ,
h (Rand Simberg) wrote:

You'll also note that he did not respond. They tend not to
do well when confronted about their mistaken beliefs.

Good lord, people. It was a troll. They come in all political
persuasions.

True. Enough is enough.

NOFAGS wrote:
The Profile of an America/George W Bush Hater

Research conducted by the John Hopkins School
of PsychoNeurology
Department Chair Lab D Room 4332
Baltimore Maryland
Male subject evaluation
June 2006 Issue of Medical Draft News


Key Personal Profile Observations of left leaning
liberal male subjects
....

Wishful, delusional, utterly made-up right-wing
nonsense clipped

How about some stuff that isn't quite so made
up:
http://expatsagainstbush.typepad.com...upporters.html

Polls have consistently have consistently
and very strongly indicated that Bush voters/
supporters and Republicans as a rule are very fuzzy
on the facts:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...isinformed.htm
http://www.newshounds.us/2004/10/23/...se_beliefs.php

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/har...ex.asp?PID=456
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/har...ex.asp?PID=544
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/har...ex.asp?PID=623

While "Bush supporter" isn't specified in the Harris
ones, we all know full well who make up the bulk
the wildly confused when you extrapolate from the
PIPA polls.

How do you like them apples?

-BC

On 18 Jul 2006 16:16:13 -0700, in a place far, far away, "BC"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:


NOFAGS wrote:
The Profile of an America/George W Bush Hater

Research conducted by the John Hopkins School
of PsychoNeurology
Department Chair Lab D Room 4332
Baltimore Maryland
Male subject evaluation
June 2006 Issue of Medical Draft News


Key Personal Profile Observations of left leaning
liberal male subjects
....

Wishful, delusional, utterly made-up right-wing
nonsense clipped

Are you so stupid as to not recognize an obvious troll?

Rand Simberg wrote:
On 18 Jul 2006 16:16:13 -0700, in a place far, far away, "BC"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:


NOFAGS wrote:
The Profile of an America/George W Bush Hater

Research conducted by the John Hopkins School
of PsychoNeurology
Department Chair Lab D Room 4332
Baltimore Maryland
Male subject evaluation
June 2006 Issue of Medical Draft News


Key Personal Profile Observations of left leaning
liberal male subjects
....

Wishful, delusional, utterly made-up right-wing
nonsense clipped

Are you so stupid as to not recognize an obvious troll?

Whom am I to pass up an opportunity to do some
quality right-wing bashing?

-BC

KenStahl wrote:

:LittlePenis wrote:
: The Profile of an America/George W Bush Hater
:
snip
:
:Absolutely fabricated. There is no such document.

And you really thought that needed to be pointed out?

Add "Cannot identify humour when hit with a baguette" to the list...

--
"Adrenaline is like exercise, but without the excessive gym fees."
-- Professor Walsh, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"

(Eric Chomko) wrote:

:Rand Simberg ) wrote:
:: On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:42:54 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
:: (Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
:: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
:
:: Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist ) wrote:
::
:: [...]
::
:: : The Times recalled that Arkansas supported Clinton's husband when he ran for
:: : president in 1992 and 1996, but then went for George W. Bush in 2000. Just
:: : 46 percent of Arkansas voted for then-Vice President Al Gore in that
:: : election, and four years later the percentage of votes for the Democratic
:: : candidate fell, with 44 percent backing Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts.
:: : Although the state's two senators are Democrats, Arkansas has been
:: : increasingly seen as a Republican stronghold at the presidential level.
::
:: 46% and 44% is not a 'stronghold'.
:
:: 46% and 44% are what the *Democrats* got, you moron.
:
:No ****, the point is that 44% and 46% are much closer to 50% to speak of
:their smallness as providing a stronghold to the other side, you imbecile.

Then let's examine a couple of states that have long been regarded as
Democratic strongholds; New York and California. In New York, Kerry
only got 60% of the vote (and he practically qualifies as a 'native
son' up there). In that Democratic stronghold of California, he got
54%.

It seems that by Mr Chomko's logic, neither of those states could
possibly be considered a 'Democratic Stronghold' because the votes are
so close to 50%.

The answer seems obvious and is in accord with the expected outcome;
El Chimpo is once more talking out his ass.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

(Eric Chomko) wrote:

:Rand Simberg ) wrote:
:: On 17 Jul 2006 10:49:28 -0700, in a place far, far away, "BC"
:: made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
:: way as to indicate that:
:
::
:: Rand Simberg wrote:
:: On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:28:09 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Bernard
:: Spilman" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
:: way as to indicate that:
::
:: Indeed, making stuff up is more the current administration's specialty
:: -- such as WMD
::
:: Which, it now turns out, existed.
::
:: Then where the **** are they? If they are there, then produce them.
::
::
:: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...063001528.html
::
:: Those are old, degraded munitions from the Iran-Iraq
:: war.
:
:: They were part of what Saddam was obligated to turn in as fulfillment
:: of the UNSC resolutions. His continuing failure to do so was the
:: primary justification for his removal, per those resolutions.
:
:But they weren't WMD.

They weren't? Did they change the definition?

:: The stuff you keep under your sink is likely more
:: lethal now. Do you really think this motly collection of
:: long lost and misplaced, filled & unfilled leftovers from
:: a messy 20yr-old war are the same "WMD's" that Bush
:: and his people have been warning against since 2002?
:
:: No. I'm simply disputing the continuing lie that there were no WMDs
:: in Iraq.
:
:That wasn't a lie. You're a dupe.

Ok, Eric, where's your threshold for how many have to be found in
order for them to constitute WMD? Or have you just adopted a
definition which says there could NEVER be WMD, no matter what is
found?

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Fred J. McCall wrote in
:

(Eric Chomko) wrote:

:Rand Simberg ) wrote:
:: On 17 Jul 2006 10:49:28 -0700, in a place far, far away, "BC"
:: made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
:: way as to indicate that:
:
::
:: Rand Simberg wrote:
:: On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:28:09 GMT, in a place far, far away,
:: "Bernard Spilman" made the phosphor on my monitor glow
:: in such a way as to indicate that:
::
:: Indeed, making stuff up is more the current administration's
:: specialty -- such as WMD
::
:: Which, it now turns out, existed.
::
:: Then where the **** are they? If they are there, then produce
:: them.
::
::
:: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...06/06/30/AR200
:: 6063001528.html
::
:: Those are old, degraded munitions from the Iran-Iraq
:: war.
:
:: They were part of what Saddam was obligated to turn in as fulfillment
:: of the UNSC resolutions. His continuing failure to do so was the
:: primary justification for his removal, per those resolutions.
:
:But they weren't WMD.

They weren't? Did they change the definition?

:: The stuff you keep under your sink is likely more
:: lethal now. Do you really think this motly collection of
:: long lost and misplaced, filled & unfilled leftovers from
:: a messy 20yr-old war are the same "WMD's" that Bush
:: and his people have been warning against since 2002?
:
:: No. I'm simply disputing the continuing lie that there were no WMDs
:: in Iraq.
:
:That wasn't a lie. You're a dupe.

Ok, Eric, where's your threshold for how many have to be found in
order for them to constitute WMD? Or have you just adopted a
definition which says there could NEVER be WMD, no matter what is
found?


"It turns out that we have not found weapons
of mass destruction."
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Oct. 4, 2004.

GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.

This is what happens when you adopt an "end justifies the means"
attitude as the
radical Leftist have.

Go ahead Lefties, protest...express your indignation.
I KNOW you people. You've dominated the US media for decades.
You taught me the true meaning of "cynical".
Cynical as in " selfishly or callously calculating ".


You are truly an idiot.

A liberal Democatic President put America on the road to landing on the
moon.

It has been liberals in the forefront of the space program.

GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.


Liberals are the ones who actually appreciate science, exploration, and
learning. They want more space programs that succeed. Conservatives
want death, hate, and fear. . .while thinking God is on thier side.