Clean, Space Shuttle mission ! Liberals bummed out.....

GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.


Liberals are the ones who actually appreciate science, exploration, and
learning. They want more space programs that succeed. Conservatives
want death, hate, and fear. . .while thinking God is on thier side.

GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.

This is what happens when you adopt an "end justifies the means"
attitude as the
radical Leftist have.

Go ahead Lefties, protest...express your indignation.
I KNOW you people. You've dominated the US media for decades.
You taught me the true meaning of "cynical".
Cynical as in " selfishly or callously calculating ".

I'm a liberal, I've been a supporter of NASA since Mercury. And I'm
happy as a clam (how happy are clams, anyway?) to see the Shuttle go
up and come down again safely.

wrote:
GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.

This is what happens when you adopt an "end justifies the means"
attitude as the
radical Leftist have.

Go ahead Lefties, protest...express your indignation.
I KNOW you people. You've dominated the US media for decades.
You taught me the true meaning of "cynical".
Cynical as in " selfishly or callously calculating ".

I'm a liberal, I've been a supporter of NASA since Mercury. And I'm
happy as a clam (how happy are clams, anyway?) to see the Shuttle go
up and come down again safely.

My contention is that had liberals been in the White House instead of
people like Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes, we would have already been
to Mars

"sss" wrote:

:My contention is that had liberals been in the White House instead of
eople like Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes, we would have already been
:to Mars

Who was the last 'liberal' who spent serious money on manned space
exploration?

What happened during the 8 Clinton years?

Conclusion: Your contention is merely silly.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Fred J. McCall wrote:
"sss" wrote:

:My contention is that had liberals been in the White House instead of
eople like Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes, we would have already been
:to Mars

Who was the last 'liberal' who spent serious money on manned space
exploration?

What happened during the 8 Clinton years?

Conclusion: Your contention is merely silly.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

--

Clinton was certainly a Democrat but he sure wasn't a liberal
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"bushlied" wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: "sss" wrote:
:
: :My contention is that had liberals been in the White House instead of
: eople like Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes, we would have already been
: :to Mars
:
: Who was the last 'liberal' who spent serious money on manned space
: exploration?
:
: What happened during the 8 Clinton years?
:
: Conclusion: Your contention is merely silly.
:
:Clinton was certainly a Democrat but he sure wasn't a liberal

Let's look again. He wanted socialized medicine, gays in the
military, etc, etc. If Clinton wasn't a liberal he put up a damned
good front of being one.

Clinton's problem was that he compromised everyplace he shouldn't have
and wouldn't compromise everywhere he should have.

--
You are
What you do
When it counts.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Fred J. McCall wrote:
"sss" wrote:

:My contention is that had liberals been in the White House instead of
eople like Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes, we would have already been
:to Mars

Who was the last 'liberal' who spent serious money on manned space
exploration?


Clinton by cutting the DOD budget.

What happened during the 8 Clinton years?

Clinton balanced the budget by not allowing the DOD budget to overrun
and thus balanced the whole US budget. NASA was funded at the same rate
as previous years.


Conclusion: Your contention is merely silly.


The problem with the GOP is that they view NASA as an extension of the
military even though Ike specifically created it otherwise. The Dems
want peaceful space exploration in lieu of war.

Eric

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

GatherNoMoss wrote:
My opinion of Liberals is so poor....So convinced am I of their
degenerate character...
that I do believe that Liberals are dissappointed that this Space
Shuttle mission was
a success.
Another dead shuttle crew would have fit their political ambitions
quite nicely.
Something else that was "Bush's" fault.

You really are a dullard. Most liberals love the space program.

Baldin Pramer

wrote:

:You really are a dullard. Most liberals love the space program.

Yeah, they love it so much they don't want to spend any money at all
on it.

--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

:You really are a dullard. Most liberals love the space program.

Yeah, they love it so much they don't want to spend any money at all
on it.

evidence?