What if(on Moon Distance?)

On Oct 17, 2:07*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:06*pm, Double-A wrote:





On Oct 16, 8:36*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Oct 16, 12:52*pm, Double-A wrote:

On Oct 16, 11:02*am, BradGuth wrote:

On Oct 16, 7:24*am, "Hagar" wrote:

"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 15, 6:52 am, "Hagar" wrote:

GuthBall, blow it out your ass, you imbecilic moron.

Why do the honest facts and best available science so upset your
narrow and shallow world where only Zionist/Nazi republicans can fix
everything?

You do realize that our planet is shrinking and losing mass, don't
you?

*~ BG

The Earth gains an average of 500 million kilograms per year from
meteorites and space dust. *It loses less than 100 million kilograms
per year from the atmosphere. *Therefore, the Earth is gaining net
mass.

Double-A

You use funny maths and bogus data. *Not half bad for a brown-nosed
clown that's kosher approved.

Get some new material. *Your insults are becoming stale! *What I
stated were the facts.

What about our accelerated loss of helium and hydrogen?

What accelerated loss?

You seem incapable of researching via the internet for anything that
doesn't agree with your kosher approved mindset, or much less do the
math of accounting for Earth's hydrogen and helium that's being
naturally and artificially released, so what's the difference?

You are either snookered and dumbfounded or just don't even care that
Big Energy foiled our spendy OCO mission.



Eden/Earth once had a 100 bar atmosphere.

Proof?

*What happened to it?

Solar flare up?

Or how about the relatively nearby Sirius B going nova from its red
supergiant phase, into becoming that little white dwarf?


Too far away.


Once upon a time Eden/Earth was every bit as newish and as bad off if
not worse off than Venus. *A significant loss of our geomagnetic force
and the subsequent loss of magnetosphere as protection from those
pesky halo CMEs or nearby novas is what allowed those pesky solar and
cosmic winds to remove 99% of our atmospheric mass.


Much of Earth's volatiles are in liquid form. Venus has all of it's
water (some of it bound up with sulfur as sulfur dioxide) in its
atmosphere. The Earth's atmosphere would be a lot thicker too if it
were as hot as Venus, and all of its oceans and polar caps were
evaporated into the atmosphere.


The original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms that so recently created
the impressive Sirius star/solar system was perhaps another earlier
blow of horrific cosmic proportions that had to have affected our
terrestrial environment.

Modern day humans have also been extensively contributing or possibly
exceeding the natural process of releasing hydrogen and especially of
the nuclear decay produced isotope of helium. *As our human population
grows, so will the release of hydrogen and helium, that which the weak
force of gravity by itself simply can not hold onto.

Making our environment matters far worse for our frail DNA and
affecting most other species of our terrestrial biodiversity, seems
our geomagnetic force has been declining at 0.1% per year. *Gee whiz,
what could possibly go wrong if this trend continues?

*~ BG


Do you think man is responsible for the declining geomagnetic force as
well?

Double-A

On Oct 18, 2:00*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Oct 17, 2:07*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Oct 17, 1:06*pm, Double-A wrote:

On Oct 16, 8:36*pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Oct 16, 12:52*pm, Double-A wrote:

On Oct 16, 11:02*am, BradGuth wrote:

On Oct 16, 7:24*am, "Hagar" wrote:

"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 15, 6:52 am, "Hagar" wrote:

GuthBall, blow it out your ass, you imbecilic moron.

Why do the honest facts and best available science so upset your
narrow and shallow world where only Zionist/Nazi republicans can fix
everything?

You do realize that our planet is shrinking and losing mass, don't
you?

*~ BG

The Earth gains an average of 500 million kilograms per year from
meteorites and space dust. *It loses less than 100 million kilograms
per year from the atmosphere. *Therefore, the Earth is gaining net
mass.

Double-A

You use funny maths and bogus data. *Not half bad for a brown-nosed
clown that's kosher approved.

Get some new material. *Your insults are becoming stale! *What I
stated were the facts.

What about our accelerated loss of helium and hydrogen?

What accelerated loss?

You seem incapable of researching via the internet for anything that
doesn't agree with your kosher approved mindset, or much less do the
math of accounting for Earth's hydrogen and helium that's being
naturally and artificially released, so what's the difference?

You are either snookered and dumbfounded or just don't even care that
Big Energy foiled our spendy OCO mission.

Eden/Earth once had a 100 bar atmosphere.

Proof?

*What happened to it?

Solar flare up?

Or how about the relatively nearby Sirius B going nova from its red
supergiant phase, into becoming that little white dwarf?

Too far away.

Once upon a time Eden/Earth was every bit as newish and as bad off if
not worse off than Venus. *A significant loss of our geomagnetic force
and the subsequent loss of magnetosphere as protection from those
pesky halo CMEs or nearby novas is what allowed those pesky solar and
cosmic winds to remove 99% of our atmospheric mass.

Much of Earth's volatiles are in liquid form. *Venus has all of it's
water (some of it bound up with sulfur as sulfur dioxide) in its
atmosphere. *The Earth's atmosphere would be a lot thicker too if it
were as hot as Venus, and all of its oceans and polar caps were
evaporated into the atmosphere.

Venus is a geologically newish planet, and doing exactly as it
should. There's at least 500+ teratonnes of pure h2o in them thar
acidic clouds, though more than likely there's 5000 teratonnes to
behold.


The original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms that so recently created
the impressive Sirius star/solar system was perhaps another earlier
blow of horrific cosmic proportions that had to have affected our
terrestrial environment.

Modern day humans have also been extensively contributing or possibly
exceeding the natural process of releasing hydrogen and especially of
the nuclear decay produced isotope of helium. *As our human population
grows, so will the release of hydrogen and helium, that which the weak
force of gravity by itself simply can not hold onto.

Making our environment matters far worse for our frail DNA and
affecting most other species of our terrestrial biodiversity, seems
our geomagnetic force has been declining at 0.1% per year. *Gee whiz,
what could possibly go wrong if this trend continues?

*~ BG

Do you think man is responsible for the declining geomagnetic force as
well?

Absolutely not, but our extremely nearby and relatively massive Selene/
moon is most likely responsible, because it is perhaps giving an/or
taking energy, worth at least some portion of the 2e20 N/sec of the
tidal radii binding force.

Of whatever the weak force of gravity is worth is also suggesting that
the massive and extremely vibrant Sirius star system is unavoidably
having some measurable affect upon us, for pretty much the same reason
why any number of local asteroids keep returning instead of exiting
our solar system.

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message ...

I did not know Dr Mörner was a republican. How did you find
this out?

Are you suggesting there's nothing kosher or otherwise faith-based
motivated about our government?

There, you did it again.

On Oct 19, 7:17*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
I did not know Dr Mörner was a republican. *How did you find
this out?

Are you suggesting there's nothing kosher or otherwise faith-based
motivated about our government?

There, you did it again.

There, you did your kosher thing again.

"BradGuth" wrote in message ...
On Oct 19, 7:17 pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...

I did not know Dr Mörner was a republican. How did you find
this out?

Are you suggesting there's nothing kosher or otherwise faith-based
motivated about our government?

There, you did it again.

There, you did your kosher thing again.

What? Pointing out your repetitious non-answers that have the form
of a bigoted non-related question?

On Oct 19, 11:07*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
On Oct 19, 7:17 pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
I did not know Dr Mörner was a republican. *How did you find
this out?

Are you suggesting there's nothing kosher or otherwise faith-based
motivated about our government?

There, you did it again.

There, you did your kosher thing again.

What? *Pointing out your repetitious non-answers that have the form
of a bigoted non-related question?

You're the one that's off-topic and kosher to boot not me.

Why do you even bother to reply to rabbi Saul? (perhaps it's because
you always agree with him)

"BradGuth" wrote in message ...

You're the one that's off-topic

I did not bring up the question regarding sea levels rising.

I am not the person that thinks that the person who has spent
a good portion of his life studying "sea levels" is a republican
(He's not even from the America's, idiot).

and kosher to boot not me.

Get a clue ya friggin' bigot. Or, does kosher actually mean
correct in your mind?


Why do you even bother to reply to rabbi Saul? (perhaps it's because
you always agree with him)

His was the last in line before I decided to respond.

On Oct 20, 8:49*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
You're the one that's off-topic

I did not bring up the question regarding sea levels rising.

I am not the person that thinks that the person who has spent
a good portion of his life studying "sea levels" is a republican
(He's not even from the America's, idiot).

For various reasons (including global warming), sea levels have been
rising. Republicans and especially Jewish ones are of those which
don't buy it.


and kosher to boot not me.

Get a clue ya friggin' bigot. *Or, does kosher actually mean
correct in your mind?


Why do you even bother to reply to rabbi Saul? (perhaps it's because
you always agree with him)

His was the last in line before I decided to respond.

That's not an acceptable answer, unless you are another pretend-
Atheist kind of Jew.

Do you think Saul Levy is not Jewish enough to count?

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message ...
On Oct 20, 8:49 pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:

For various reasons (including global warming), sea levels have been
rising. Republicans and especially Jewish ones are of those which
don't buy it.

Oh, so he is either a Jew or a republican. Nice logic, there. It's so easy
to disregard evidence when the gatherer does not fit a specific profile
that will assuredly be randomly generated based on your misconceptions.


His was the last in line before I decided to respond.

That's not an acceptable answer, unless you are another pretend-
Atheist kind of Jew.

It seems that truth is not an acceptable answer for you. I suspect
you'd make a good inquisitioner. Your thought process is identical.
Yes, admit your sins and be purified by the fire of the lord...

or

Don't admit your sins and be purified by the fire of the lord.

Yeah, can't go wrong with you...


Do you think Saul Levy is not Jewish enough to count?

What I think about Saul is irrelevant. I'm not the one casting about
labels based on pure speculative prejudice.

On Oct 20, 10:23*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
On Oct 20, 8:49 pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
For various reasons (including global warming), sea levels have been
rising. *Republicans and especially Jewish ones are of those which
don't buy it.

Oh, so he is either a Jew or a republican. *Nice logic, there. *It's so easy
to disregard evidence when the gatherer does not fit a specific profile
that will assuredly be randomly generated based on your misconceptions.


His was the last in line before I decided to respond.

That's not an acceptable answer, unless you are another pretend-
Atheist kind of Jew.

It seems that truth is not an acceptable answer for you. *I suspect
you'd make a good inquisitioner. *Your thought process is identical.
Yes, admit your sins and be purified by the fire of the lord...

or

Don't admit your sins and be purified by the fire of the lord.

Yeah, can't go wrong with you...



Do you think Saul Levy is not Jewish enough to count?

What I think about Saul is irrelevant. *I'm not the one casting about
labels based on pure speculative prejudice.

In case you don't quite get it, I do not like rabbi Saul Levy or
anyone that useless ******* and faith-based pervert interacts with.
Such Jews as Saul tell us lies, and they otherwise obfuscate and never
police their own kind. Ever heard of 9/11, or Jesus Christ that spoke
and acted against Jewish debauchery?

~ BG