![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 26, 5:29 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Maybe they can use some sort of high pressure air hose to blow the dust off the suits Why not stand outside and let the vacuum suck it off? Actually a moonsuit that's well enough coated with a layer of Po-210 should help with the anti-electrostatic situation of getting rid of that pesky moon dust. Otherwise a teraVolt of a reverse polarity charge before coming inside might be sufficient. - Brad Guth |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah, and what is the current phase? Gibbous ;-D |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... I wouldn't be at all surprised if what the come up with is some sort of fairly cheap over-suit that covers the actual suit, and you dispose of after a few EVAs. Say something made out of woven glass fiber to prevent degradation or boil-off in vacuum and hard UV. Well, the original suits used lunar overshoes, I don't see any reason why a lunar suit couldn't have the equivalent of a Tyvek oversuit that covers everything except the helmet and gloves. With voice operated controls, you can cover nearly the whole suit. Something like a sticky-tape lint rod could be used on the parts of the suit that aren't disposable every EVA, with a thorough cleaning during periodic maintenance. If you have a dozen people regularly participating in lunar EVAs, then you might very well need one person full time on suit maintenance. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Doc Smartass wrote: Oh, man. I'm allergic to those things. Inside of my helmet would have more than just the air freshener. ![]() Tiny Pauly Perrette doll...naked: http://www.popentertainment.com/Perrette101_02.jpg Scent? "Hot As Hell". :-D Man...watching her makes me drool like Homer looking at a donut... It's just so cool that she can give the writing staff forensic tips, just like the guy who plays McGee can give them computer tips. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Malbon" wrote in message ... BradGuth You know, it's almost poetic how you managed to cram so much complete utter and total ******** into one sentence. He has a lot of practice. What separates him from the usual crank is he doesn't use as many CAPITAL LETTERS. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bry wrote: Yeah, and what is the current phase? Gibbous ;-D I'm glad somebody finally got that joke. :-) Pat |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Hedrick wrote: Something like a sticky-tape lint rod could be used on the parts of the suit that aren't disposable every EVA, with a thorough cleaning during periodic maintenance. If you have a dozen people regularly participating in lunar EVAs, then you might very well need one person full time on suit maintenance. The Russians use a semi-disposable approach to their suits; you do so many (was it five?) EVA's with them and then toss them overboard, like the one that was turned into a satellite fairly recently. On the lunar suits, there may be enough wear over time where the suit proper wears out, but you could maybe save the helmet and backpack/rear door. Pat |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Hedrick wrote: He has a lot of practice. What separates him from the usual crank is he doesn't use as many CAPITAL LETTERS. ALL YOUR CAPITAL LETTERS ARE BELONG TO US! :-P PAT |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:37:47 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote: The Russians use a semi-disposable approach to their suits; you do so many (was it five?) EVA's with them and then toss them overboard, like the one that was turned into a satellite fairly recently. ....IIRC, the five uses limit is a bit conservative, and was actually urged by NASA even though the Ruskies feel the suits are good for at least 10 EVAs of at least 6 hours in length. In fact, there's been some discussions about not immediately dumping suits that are just out of "warranty", and keeping at least three around for emergencies. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 28, 5:27 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:29 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote: "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Maybe they can use some sort of high pressure air hose to blow the dust off the suits Why not stand outside and let the vacuum suck it off? Actually a moonsuit that's well enough coated with a layer of Po-210 should help with the anti-electrostatic situation of getting rid of that pesky moon dust. Otherwise a teraVolt of a reverse polarity charge or impulse before coming inside might be sufficient. - Brad Guth That's odd, as to mention the best available truth gets those Usenet lights turned off, and those exit doors slammed shut. Our physically dark moon is in fact highly electrostatic charged, whereas at times it could be charged to the potential of being teraVolts different than Earth. Of course a valid science platform of instruments as easily located within the moon's L1 would tell us exactly how many teraVolts and of what sort of polarity we're talking about. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cool the earth with a nuke blowing up moon dust | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 1 | July 3rd 06 09:55 PM |
Jupiter's 'Big Brother' Has Moon-Foruming Dust Disk | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:32 PM |
Depth of the Moon Dust Cover-up? WHY?? | [email protected] | Misc | 418 | February 28th 06 10:35 PM |
Depth of the Moon Dust Cover-up? WHY?? | Kadaitcha Man | Misc | 14 | February 21st 06 03:49 AM |
NASA Scientists to Discuss Risks of Moon Dust | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | March 25th 05 06:09 PM |