IRT Equations for Frequency and Wavelength Shifts of Incoming Light in All Environments

"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 21, 8:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 21, 6:59 pm, Paul Cardinale wrote:





kenseto wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
ups.com...
Perhaps you don't realize what is going on. It's very difficult
for
most normal people to grasp the depth of the kenseto's stupidity.
None of your arguments will have any effect on him; he is
incapable of
following even the simplest logic. Consider for example that he
knows
he is incapable of applying his so-called theory to yield any kind
of
solution to anything; even a person of extremely poor intellectual
capacity will reallize that a 'theory' that yields no results is
worthless. But the kenseto is incapable of grasping even that.
The
fact that he can't show that IRT solves anything, doesn't diminish
his
belief that it does. Moreover, any attempt to explain anything to
him
will fail; he is incapable of even the most modest learning.

Paul Cardinale

Cardinale is a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
An idiot who think that SR is a religion. A moron who can't
comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows that
real SR
experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet
puppy chow.
An arsehole who will attack anybody who dared to disagree with SR.

That is the standard canned response from the kenseto when he has been
utterly defeated and is going to skulk away.

Paul Cardinale

I really wish Ken seriously responded to my comparison between the
various geometries that share the first four postulates with Euclidean
geometry.

He can't. He isn't able to understand such a comparison. He hasn't a
clue how to respond. All he can do (literally) is cry "runt" then run
away.

ROTFLOL....talk about clueless the runt Cardinale failed the Mars Lander
mission. He forgot to convert the English units into the cgs units.

On May 22, 6:37 am, "kenseto" wrote:
"Jeckyl" wrote in message

...



"kenseto" wrote in message
.. .

This can be tested easily by measuring the the F_ab from a standard
light
source from geosynchroneous satellite. Then use the the measured F_ab
in
the
converted IRT equations to predict the incoming frequency and
wavelength
if
the incoming light from the satellite. If the predicted values agree
with
the measured value then the IRT equations are valid in a gravtational
environments

You use the words "if" and "can", which suggests that these HAVEN'T be
proven to work (at least, not yet)

Hey ****ing idiot runt how do you falsify a theory? Don't you do
experiments
to see if the predictions of the theory agree with experimental results?

Hey ****ing idiot runt .. HAVE there been experiements that show the
predictions of your theory agree // all you say is that it CAN be tested,
not that it HAS been tested.

Hey ****ing idiot runt of the SRians.....If I have the resources to do these
experiments I wouldn't be here wasting my time talking to idiot like you.

How is spending a decade+ on USENET going to get anything done?

In article om,
Eric Gisse wrote:


Hey ****ing idiot runt of the SRians.....If I have the resources to do these
experiments I wouldn't be here wasting my time talking to idiot like you.

How is spending a decade+ on USENET going to get anything done?


He's directly doing the experiment to see if

\sum_{posters} usenet = K runts

is where K approaches infnity

--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).

Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

"kenseto" wrote in message
...

"Jeckyl" wrote in message
...
"kenseto" wrote in message
...

This can be tested easily by measuring the the F_ab from a standard
light
source from geosynchroneous satellite. Then use the the measured
F_ab
in
the
converted IRT equations to predict the incoming frequency and
wavelength
if
the incoming light from the satellite. If the predicted values agree
with
the measured value then the IRT equations are valid in a
gravtational
environments

You use the words "if" and "can", which suggests that these HAVEN'T be
proven to work (at least, not yet)

Hey ****ing idiot runt how do you falsify a theory? Don't you do
experiments
to see if the predictions of the theory agree with experimental
results?

Hey ****ing idiot runt .. HAVE there been experiements that show the
predictions of your theory agree // all you say is that it CAN be tested,
not that it HAS been tested.

Hey ****ing idiot runt of the SRians.....If I have the resources to do
these
experiments I wouldn't be here wasting my time talking to idiot like you.

So you don't even know if your theory works .. how about you STOP wasting
time posting and do a little work on it.

kenseto wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 21, 8:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 21, 6:59 pm, Paul Cardinale wrote:





kenseto wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
ups.com...
Perhaps you don't realize what is going on. It's very difficult
for
most normal people to grasp the depth of the kenseto's stupidity.
None of your arguments will have any effect on him; he is
incapable of
following even the simplest logic. Consider for example that he
knows
he is incapable of applying his so-called theory to yield any kind
of
solution to anything; even a person of extremely poor intellectual
capacity will reallize that a 'theory' that yields no results is
worthless. But the kenseto is incapable of grasping even that.
The
fact that he can't show that IRT solves anything, doesn't diminish
his
belief that it does. Moreover, any attempt to explain anything to
him
will fail; he is incapable of even the most modest learning.

Paul Cardinale

Cardinale is a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
An idiot who think that SR is a religion. A moron who can't
comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows that
real SR
experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet
puppy chow.
An arsehole who will attack anybody who dared to disagree with SR.

That is the standard canned response from the kenseto when he has been
utterly defeated and is going to skulk away.

Paul Cardinale

I really wish Ken seriously responded to my comparison between the
various geometries that share the first four postulates with Euclidean
geometry.

He can't. He isn't able to understand such a comparison. He hasn't a
clue how to respond. All he can do (literally) is cry "runt" then run
away.

ROTFLOL....talk about clueless the runt Cardinale failed the Mars Lander
mission. He forgot to convert the English units into the cgs units.

As can be seen by the kenseto's above post, he is not only brutally
stupid, he is also a lying *******.
YOU KENSETO ARE VILE PUTRID SCUM. Not only do you have no intellect,
you have not even one shred of moral fiber. You are of absolutely no
value to society and the world will be a better place when you drop
dead.

Paul Cardinale

On May 22, 10:06 pm, Paul Cardinale
wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
roups.com...
On May 21, 8:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 21, 6:59 pm, Paul Cardinale wrote:

kenseto wrote:
"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message
ups.com...
Perhaps you don't realize what is going on. It's very difficult
for
most normal people to grasp the depth of the kenseto's stupidity.
None of your arguments will have any effect on him; he is
incapable of
following even the simplest logic. Consider for example that he
knows
he is incapable of applying his so-called theory to yield any kind
of
solution to anything; even a person of extremely poor intellectual
capacity will reallize that a 'theory' that yields no results is
worthless. But the kenseto is incapable of grasping even that.
The
fact that he can't show that IRT solves anything, doesn't diminish
his
belief that it does. Moreover, any attempt to explain anything to
him
will fail; he is incapable of even the most modest learning.

Paul Cardinale

Cardinale is a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
An idiot who think that SR is a religion. A moron who can't
comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows that
real SR
experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like gourmet
puppy chow.
An arsehole who will attack anybody who dared to disagree with SR.

That is the standard canned response from the kenseto when he has been
utterly defeated and is going to skulk away.

Paul Cardinale

I really wish Ken seriously responded to my comparison between the
various geometries that share the first four postulates with Euclidean
geometry.

He can't. He isn't able to understand such a comparison. He hasn't a
clue how to respond. All he can do (literally) is cry "runt" then run
away.

ROTFLOL....talk about clueless the runt Cardinale failed the Mars Lander
mission. He forgot to convert the English units into the cgs units.

As can be seen by the kenseto's above post, he is not only brutally
stupid, he is also a lying *******.
YOU KENSETO ARE VILE PUTRID SCUM. Not only do you have no intellect,
you have not even one shred of moral fiber. You are of absolutely no
value to society and the world will be a better place when you drop
dead.

Paul Cardinale- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

ROTFLOL the runt Cardinale is going berserk....he can dish it out but
can't take it.

In article .com,
kenseto wrote:

ROTFLOL the runt Cardinale is going berserk....he can dish it out but
can't take it.


HE sure can dish out the science, unlike you Ken.

--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).

Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

kenseto wrote:

ROTFLOL the runt Cardinale is going berserk....he can dish it out but
can't take it.


This is all that you are really about, isn't it? You don't believe a
single thing that you circularly construct; you're simply in it for
the laughs for as long as you can make them last. Gotta hand it to
you how good your long track record makes you seem to be at that
endeavor. :-)


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news
In article .com,
kenseto wrote:

ROTFLOL the runt Cardinale is going berserk....he can dish it out but
can't take it.


HE sure can dish out the science, unlike you Ken.

I didn't see any science from him. OTOH maybe you think that insult is
science.

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...
kenseto wrote:

ROTFLOL the runt Cardinale is going berserk....he can dish it out but
can't take it.


This is all that you are really about, isn't it?

No he started it by insulting me.. I presented IRT equation for frequency
shift and wavelength shift and that's science.

You don't believe a
single thing that you circularly construct; you're simply in it for
the laughs for as long as you can make them last.

You are a moron.....you think that I spent all these time to construct a
theory just for laugh??