![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Jun 2005 17:10:36 -0700, "AstroHoney"
wrote: I think you have your head shoved up McCarthy's arse. If Celestron had been bought by a Canadian company, American's would bemoaning that production had moved to a gun-registry-bilingual-gay-marriage-pot-smoking country (but-at-least-still-better-than-China). They haven't said much about Canada now producing more cars for American companies than America. What really hurts is seeing China beat Americans at their own "capitalist" game and nothing can be done about--can't even invade 'em. Anybody who feels guilty about buying from China/Synta is really quite an idiot and should get their head out of Rich's ass. AstroHoney Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
On 19 Jun 2005 17:10:36 -0700, "AstroHoney" wrote: I think you have your head shoved up McCarthy's arse. If Celestron had been bought by a Canadian company, American's would bemoaning that production had moved to a gun-registry-bilingual-gay-marriage-pot-smoking country (but-at-least-still-better-than-China). They haven't said much about Canada now producing more cars for American companies than America. What really hurts is seeing China beat Americans at their own "capitalist" game and nothing can be done about--can't even invade 'em. Anybody who feels guilty about buying from China/Synta is really quite an idiot and should get their head out of Rich's ass. .... Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! If all China produced goods were suddenly stopped at USA Customs and turned back, US commerce would grind to a halt, as many US manufacturers produce much of their products in China/Taiwan/Phillipines/Malaysia, etc. It's called globalization and competition, and it's been happening for a long time. WalMart just sells the goods, as do Target, KMart, Sears, Macy's and many other retailers. If American manufacturers can make optical goods that perform better, but cost about the same as or less than the Synta optics, then they'll have little to worry about from Synta. Otherwise... -- Pat O'Connell [note munged EMail address] Take nothing but pictures, Leave nothing but footprints, Kill nothing but vandals... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Takes One to Call one ... comrade.
RichA wrote: Synta is now the proud owner of Celestron. They probably bought in because the patents and technology to make SCT correctors is essential to reproduce that business in MAINLAND CHINA! So the next time a tank rolls over some democracy protester in Tianamen Square, picture a C8 mounted on the front of it! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
John Savard wrote: But since Synta has a manufacturing plant in _Mainland_ China - I believe that must be what you meant, since Taiwan _is_ part of China, That's a pretty misleading way to put it. As a matter of fact, Taiwan calls itself "Republic of China" .... http://www.gio.gov.tw/ Taiwan in no way considers itself to be part of anything larger--at least, not at the present moment. It would only consider the proposition of becoming part of a larger China if the mainland ceases what Taiwan considers to be unreasonable aggression. The mainland, of course, does consider Taiwan to be part of it. But it's not quite the plain factual matter your words suggest. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt -- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at saaf dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Schlyter wrote:
As a matter of fact, Taiwan calls itself "Republic of China" .... You guys must think I'm a total ignoramus or something when it comes to Taiwan and China. I'm well aware of the name R.O.C. However, that's not what John said. He said that Taiwan is part of China. That means something quite different to the average informed reader (from the U.S., at least). The fact that Taiwan is historically (although only back to about 1600 or so) and culturally part of China is mostly irrelevant when it comes to their business practices, which are largely a product of the last century. The two do have a business relationship, but that does not rely on the two being part of a larger China. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They haven't said much about Canada now producing more
cars for American companies than America. Call up some folks at ITCAN and ask them about some of the absurd excuses they receive from Americans for not doing business in Canada. Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! That's right, Wal-mart is really a commune and all the comrades have read the Communist Manifesto. Arise ye workers from your slumbers Arise ye prisoners of want For reason in revolt now thunders And at last ends the age of cant. Away with all your superstitions Servile masses arise, arise We'll change henceforth the old tradition And spurn the dust to win the prize. So comrades, come rally And the last fight let us face The Internationale unites the human race. So comrades, come rally And the last fight let us face The Internationale unites the human race. AstroHoney |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree with what you say but there is a difference. In the US the workers are permitted to organize into unions. The unions become powereful raised the wages/benifits and forced the companies out of business,i.e. steel, auto and others. james wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:30:44 -0400, RichA wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 21:38:06 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote: In oups.com "Matthew Ota" wrote: Our American culture, IMHO is too Euro-centric. Most Americans cannot differentiate between any Asian counry or culture. This is a good example. Not really; the poster was a Canadian and a troll. Of course it was a troll, I wanted people's opinions on the subject and the best way to elicit them is to make the people who buy from the communist slave owners feel bad or at least defensive. Which I succeeded in doing, I'd say. But don't worry; You can assuage your guilt with the often repeated old saw that "communism and tyranny in China is being repealed by the capitalism" they are now experimenting with. -Rich ***** Which is better to buy from 1) communist controlled company using near slave labor or 2) US capitalistic company using near slave labor? To me there is no difference. Instead we jump on band wagons of patriotism and never understand the economics of moves made by corporate world. Rule #1 of corporations both comunistic or capitalistic is to make money. Rule #2 the bulk of the money made is shared among the investors and/or controllers of the corporation. Whether it be individuals or governments. rule #3 you or I are never going to change rule #1 or rule #2 james |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:54:33 -0700, Pat O'Connell
wrote: RichA wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 17:10:36 -0700, "AstroHoney" wrote: I think you have your head shoved up McCarthy's arse. If Celestron had been bought by a Canadian company, American's would bemoaning that production had moved to a gun-registry-bilingual-gay-marriage-pot-smoking country (but-at-least-still-better-than-China). They haven't said much about Canada now producing more cars for American companies than America. What really hurts is seeing China beat Americans at their own "capitalist" game and nothing can be done about--can't even invade 'em. Anybody who feels guilty about buying from China/Synta is really quite an idiot and should get their head out of Rich's ass. ... Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! If all China produced goods were suddenly stopped at USA Customs and turned back, US commerce would grind to a halt, as many US manufacturers produce much of their products in China/Taiwan/Phillipines/Malaysia, etc. It's called globalization and competition, and it's been happening for a long time. WalMart just sells the goods, as do Target, KMart, Sears, Macy's and many other retailers. If American manufacturers can make optical goods that perform better, but cost about the same as or less than the Synta optics, then they'll have little to worry about from Synta. Otherwise... I love how people are so cavlier about this, as if THEIR own jobs will never be threatened by competition from a vastly lower-paid Indian or Chinese workforce. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Jun 2005 04:53:29 -0700, "AstroHoney"
wrote: They haven't said much about Canada now producing more cars for American companies than America. Call up some folks at ITCAN and ask them about some of the absurd excuses they receive from Americans for not doing business in Canada. Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! That's right, Wal-mart is really a commune and all the comrades have read the Communist Manifesto. Did you hear that woosh? That was the point going over your head. -Rich |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:54:33 -0700, Pat O'Connell wrote: RichA wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 17:10:36 -0700, "AstroHoney" wrote: I think you have your head shoved up McCarthy's arse. If Celestron had been bought by a Canadian company, American's would bemoaning that production had moved to a gun-registry-bilingual-gay-marriage-pot-smoking country (but-at-least-still-better-than-China). They haven't said much about Canada now producing more cars for American companies than America. What really hurts is seeing China beat Americans at their own "capitalist" game and nothing can be done about--can't even invade 'em. Anybody who feels guilty about buying from China/Synta is really quite an idiot and should get their head out of Rich's ass. ... Spoken like a true "Walmart Man." Right hand to left breast, lets SING the Walmart anthem!!!!! If all China produced goods were suddenly stopped at USA Customs and turned back, US commerce would grind to a halt, as many US manufacturers produce much of their products in China/Taiwan/Phillipines/Malaysia, etc. It's called globalization and competition, and it's been happening for a long time. WalMart just sells the goods, as do Target, KMart, Sears, Macy's and many other retailers. If American manufacturers can make optical goods that perform better, but cost about the same as or less than the Synta optics, then they'll have little to worry about from Synta. Otherwise... I love how people are so cavlier about this, as if THEIR own jobs Believe me, I do worry about my own job. will never be threatened by competition from a vastly lower-paid Indian or Chinese workforce. Not much to be cavalier about--many jobs are already in other countries. Go into any store that sells clothing and/or electronics. Take a look at where the stuff's made. Very little is made in the USA. We bought a KitchenAid mixer recently; the box proudly announces that it's assembled in the USA. That doesn't necessarily mean the parts were made in the USA, though. -- Pat O'Connell [note munged EMail address] Take nothing but pictures, Leave nothing but footprints, Kill nothing but vandals... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron vs Celestron Pacific | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 31 | April 23rd 05 10:09 AM |
Orange Country Register: Celestron Down, Meade Sinking | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | April 6th 05 04:24 AM |
Brief Review of Celestron ED80 | Jason Martin | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | October 25th 04 11:54 PM |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |