![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Instead of making saving Hubble dependent on the successful design of an
elaborate telemanipulator device that will completely recondition the whole telescope... and probably wreck it if it does one thing wrong... if it is possible to launch a simple robot probe to Hubble to cause it to fall into the sea... and if the Space Station meets NASA's safety standards as a place to send astronauts even if they have to fly there in the superannuated Shuttle... why not send a robot probe to the Hubble Space Telescope that will simply shift it into the Space Station's orbit? Then, it can be repaired at the Space Station, and then sent back up into its usual high orbit. In fact, if this is successful, it could be sent back up into an even higher orbit, so we wouldn't have to worry about having to make it fall into the sea later. After all, we don't have to worry about the Moon falling down. Of course, that would use more fuel, and a really advanced telemanipulator would be useful for other things; sending people into space, but only when necessary, with some work done ahead of time for them. John Savard http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hubble: RIP | Joe S. | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | January 18th 04 02:21 AM |
Instead of the parachute and bouncing balls, engineer a capsule that withstands the damage | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 31 | January 8th 04 12:13 AM |
INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT -- "HUBBLE ASSISTS ROSETTA COMET MISSION" (STScI-PR03-26) | HST NEWS RELEASES | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 5th 03 08:16 PM |
Hubble tracks down a galaxy cluster's dark matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 01:42 PM |