![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/17/2010 10:04 AM, Jorge R. Frank wrote:
Neil, why are you continuing to ask questions that *you* *yourself* provided answers for in your initial post? Without a dedicated CRV, *all* the ISS Commercial Crew vehicles would have the six-month stay requirement levied upon them. With a dedicated CRV, that requirement is relaxed and the Commercial Crew vehicles would only be required to perform short-term rotation. SpaceX is already designing Dragon to be able to do that, for their DragonLab commercial variant, so it doesn't really change anything for them or add to Dragon's development costs. Pat |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:42:44 -0800, Pat Flannery
wrote: SpaceX is already designing Dragon to be able to do that, for their DragonLab commercial variant, so it doesn't really change anything for them or add to Dragon's development costs. Big difference in reliability requirements, though. If a DragonLab fails, SpaceX has a few unhappy customers. If DragonLifeboat fails, we have dead astronauts. Brian |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
That's certainly the situation in a nutshell. Soyuz has to be the "Jeep" of spacecraft, it's not ideal for any particular task, but incredibly adaptable and versatile enough to perform a whole plethora* of missions fairly well. * Triple word score...I think that is the second or third time I've used that word in writing in my entire life. The sucker has just been sitting around in the back of my vocabulary, getting more covered in cobwebs and dust as the decades moved on. ;-) If you practice with sufficient diligence you will discover a veritable plethora of vernacular possiblities in podiatric repose with which to embellish your inter-personal communications. rick jones -- denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth... where do you want to be today? these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/19/2010 9:26 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
If you practice with sufficient diligence you will discover a veritable plethora of vernacular possiblities in podiatric repose with which to embellish your inter-personal communications. You can't fool me...you're William F. Buckley, aren't you? AREN'T YOU? I thought so. But if you're here...then who's in the coffin? It's Gore Vidal, isn't it Mr. Buckley? ISN'T IT? ;-) Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A minor justification | Skywise | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 30th 09 11:28 PM |
A minor justification | Skywise | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 30th 09 11:28 PM |
The justification of mediocre eyepieces | RichA | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | December 18th 04 02:52 PM |
No clear justification for manned return to moon | Mike Rhino | Policy | 20 | January 15th 04 02:55 PM |
Possible Justification for a Lunar Base? | John W. Landrum | Technology | 2 | September 30th 03 06:52 PM |