![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starman The age of the universe of 13.5 billion years is not a fact.
Fact is using the light waves getting longer and redder shows the size and age of the universe getting older. I predict my 22 billion years will be shown to be closer to reality in about 35 years. My thinking has aways been about 35 years ahead. Hope to have a ghost writer help me write a book on all my theories. Will also reveal my way of taking the fastest pictures in the world(million times faster than a strobe. will give out my pulse fusion machine. Show how so many machines can be made to work better. How the heat of the Sun can keep you cool. How to start small gas engines without any battery or human energy. I know how every thing works. I also know the more I think things out,on my own the more fun in thinking I just wish I had a better education,and knew how to write better. Reality is if you find some of my first posts(about 8 years ago. You would have great fun with me. However 8 years ago I was not very touchy. I 'm getting old and grouchy. I blame myself for being alone,thinking its my fault for not being friendly. Well I do have my internet friends. Sometimes even Cactus Saul makes me laugh,and when I laugh I feel good inside. Well its my last brew for today(reached my limit) Cheers Bert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott you find fault with every thing I say. You do not know my latest time lapse theory and you are already knocking it. I doubt very much if you are a teacher. What school would want a person that has so little respect for another person's original thinking. That guy Jeans did not have accelerators,or Hubble space telescope back in 1902. Best you keep that in mind. Oops I forgot you have no mind of your own. You are a parrot. Reality is its the parrot brains that attack me personally,and can only find fault with every one of my theories. Shame on you all Reality is some of my theories have been discussed in schools in many countries,and words like "fascinating",challenging" and have you published have been used Go figure Bert There you go again - reality smacks you in the face and you ignore it. Talk about lack of an open mind. You have been given a resource. Go look it up. If you can prove it wrong, then I might consider your drivel (likely best used for lining a bird's cage but I digress...). So, to repeat, again - you have no theories. You lack even cognizant thoughts. You attack what you don't understand, which is typical of lower life forms. You waste just about everyone's time correcting you over and over and over again, and attack them when they point out your shortcomings. So, when you can clearly demonstrate the errors in the status quo, please feel free to elaborate. Likely it will be a humorous effort, demonstrating your lack of knowledge in this field. But go ahead and knock yourself out. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Reality is My theories come out of good science thinking. They
answer hard questions. they make people think.I have proven my "Time lapse inertia theory" I have been emailed that my "spin is in theory" is facinating. Your personal attacts only prove you are a low life. A person not fit to be a teacher. A kind of teacher Einstein warned us about. A kind of witless teacher who would throw away a paper might have scribbled on it E=Mc^2 right into the trash can. Your thinking can only parrot the thoughts of others,and if not for people like me that can speculate,and bring new ideas to light we would still be in the dark ages. People like me that think ahead of the times were burned at the stake,and it was people like you that lite the flame Your posts knocking my thinking every chance you get proves this Get lost Bert |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott Reality is My theories come out of good science thinking. They answer hard questions. they make people think.I have proven my "Time lapse inertia theory" I have been emailed that my "spin is in theory" is facinating. Your personal attacts only prove you are a low life. A person not fit to be a teacher. A kind of teacher Einstein warned us about. A kind of witless teacher who would throw away a paper might have scribbled on it E=Mc^2 right into the trash can. Your thinking can only parrot the thoughts of others,and if not for people like me that can speculate,and bring new ideas to light we would still be in the dark ages. People like me that think ahead of the times were burned at the stake,and it was people like you that lite the flame Your posts knocking my thinking every chance you get proves this Get lost Bert Witless one - a good teacher points out the errors of his/her student. To whit, you have not demonstrated a need in current physics based on shortcomings in those theories. You simply are babbling in a void. Until you can demonstate where current theories fail and how your ideas fill those gaps, you are blowing in the wind. So, getting back to the point at hand - clearly demonstrate the errors in Jeans' analysis. Then demonstrate how your current ideas fill those errors with new science that can be tested. Einstein did no less so surely you are up to the task. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott You left out a good teacher will encourage a student to be curios.
Will encourage when he,or she recognizes a person that can present new ideas. A good teacher teaches respect for this type of student. I am such a free thinker,and your attacks on my posts are personal.(kill the messenger) rather than discuss the science being conveyed. You are a parrot,and your thinking will not respect the thinking of others. As I posted Einstein had low fifes like you that he had to deal with as a youth. He did not let them stop him. He got a Nobel. I will post my original thoughts no matter what you say. I'm told that some of my theories are very interesting,and are being discussed in many universities throughout the world,such as Belgium,Canada ,Russia and many other countries. I like that In our county MIT finds me interesting Have not heard from Harvard Go figure Bert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | February 2nd 06 01:37 AM |
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a | Roger wilco | History | 4 | July 8th 05 06:11 PM |
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 04 03:17 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | May 21st 04 11:44 PM |