Wave as wave, particle as particle

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, "If we arrange these 6 sets
of hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths, we
find an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as
shown in Fig.5-5-1, and table 5-2 (a map of spectral series). It
signifies that there exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of
spectra. The largest energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer
series, the secondary larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen
series and no energy gap between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series.
After Brackett series, we find that their spectral series turn out to
overlap with one another, and the overlapping zone becomes
progressively broader and broader".
He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron
ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and
Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without
frequency choice. That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital
electron rings has like a continuous pattern, and any kind of mass
bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice. He
explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be
shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater
and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its
radius, and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency
choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation. And that
is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach
its nucleus. He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the
restructuring the texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes

In other words, gobbledy-gook.

produced by orbital electron rings, as it changes its orbital radius;
the shorter the radius of electron ring the greater the energy input
for the restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes. When the shrunk
orbital electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this
energy it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission
and fusion energy. Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid
equation, E=mc^2.

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
The quantum oscillator( atomic model whose orbital electron is
explained with Schrodinger equation) takes up any photons without
conditions. For example, it can take up U.V., visible, I.R photons and
even x-ray photons without any discrimination of their frequency,
coincidence of their oscillatory wave phases, and incoming
directionality of em and etc. However, Dr. Yoon's atomic model does not
allow such a blind absorption of em wave energy. It requires 4
conditions in order to increase its energy level by taking up external
em wave energy. 1) The electron ring has to have resonant frequency to
that of incoming em; the same or integer multiple frequency relation
between them. 2) Provided that first condition is fulfilled, there must
exist an energy gradient between the orbital electron ring and incoming
em, in terms of their oscillatory amplitudes. 3) Provided that the
first and second conditions are satisfied, the oscillatory direction of
orbital electron ring must have a favorable angle against the
preceeding direction of incoming em for the effective energy exchange
between them. 4) Provided further that the first, second and third
conditions are fulfilled, the orbital electron ring has to have
coincidental oscillatory phase with that of incoming em. Otherwise
there occurs a considerable destructive phase interference between
them. These 4 conditions are needed strictly in order to explain the
black body radiation, as well as the mechanism of forming laser light.
(explanation of laser light by QM theory is totally false). If the
probability of satisfying condition 1) by an electron ring exposed in a
continuous spectrum is P(1), the probability for condition 2), P(2),
the probability for condition 3), P(3), and the final probability for
condition 4), P(4), then total probability P to satisfy all the five
conditions becomes, P=P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4). It signifies that an orbital
electron ring is very difficult to have successively a lucky chance to
meet a favorable em from which it can take up energy, and the same is
in the reverse case when an electron ring has the worst chance to meet
the favorable em from which it can also take up energy. Consequently
the other group of atomic electron rings distributes between these two
extreme cases. Thus the energy taken up by orbital electron rings by
frequency wise, would draw a curve that has indeed a marked resemblance
to that obtained from maxwell's distribution law. This is the
explanation of black body radiation as well as avoiding ultraviolet
catastrophe.

Going to atomic dynamics. Classical laws says that revolving
electron would radiate away its energy and collapse into the
nucleus. Granted your magnetic field induced in the electron
electric field tails (lagging effect) through some unknown
mechanism can repel the nucleus in a kinda of modified Meissner
like effect attributing for its stability similar to the
de_broglie standing waves holding the orbitals, how do
you account for the fact the your continuously revolving electron
and charge never radiate or lose the energy? If classical
laws is right.

Classical physics as applied to electrons went out decades ago. Perhaps you
and "Dr. Yoon" have been so busy writing gobbledy-gook you've not kept up
with your readings.


It should radiate and the magnetic field induced
at the electric field tail should diminish in power since
the electron decelerates until the electron just collapse into
the nucleus. What prevented it??

Revolving electron is not an oscillatory motion, so it does not emit
energy, as though the earth revolving around the sun does not lose its
kinetic energy. Oscillation means the energy oscillation between two
forms of energies commutable, for example, between kinetic and
potential energy, or between electric and magnetic energy. Thus there
occurs no energy oscillation between its electric and magnetic energies
of revolving electron around its nucleus. As mentioned previously, Dr.
Yoon's electron ring never merges into its nucleus, because the energy
barrier between each step of its radial reduction increases
reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radial parameter. Its
texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes (magnetic force fluxes
are always induced on perpendicular planes of electric force fluxes)
have to be restructured as the electron ring changes its radius. This
is the origin of energy barrier. newedana


Magic would be a better explanation than your crapola.

In article ,
Uncle Al wrote:
newedana wrote:

In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics,
[snip crap]

Purest bull****. Crap spewing like a fountain.

Yoon flushed a cherry bomb.


--
"A nice adaptation of conditions will make almost any hypothesis agree
with the phenomena. This will please the imagination but does not advance
our knowledge." -- J. Black, 1803.

newedana wrote:
The quantum oscillator( atomic model whose orbital electron is
explained with Schrodinger equation) takes up any photons without
conditions. For example, it can take up U.V., visible, I.R photons
and
even x-ray photons without any discrimination of their frequency,
coincidence of their oscillatory wave phases, and incoming
directionality of em and etc. However, Dr. Yoon's atomic model does
not
allow such a blind absorption of em wave energy. It requires 4
conditions in order to increase its energy level by taking up
external
em wave energy. 1) The electron ring has to have resonant frequency
to
that of incoming em; the same or integer multiple frequency relation
between them. 2) Provided that first condition is fulfilled, there
must
exist an energy gradient between the orbital electron ring and
incoming
em, in terms of their oscillatory amplitudes. 3) Provided that the
first and second conditions are satisfied, the oscillatory direction
of
orbital electron ring must have a favorable angle against the
preceeding direction of incoming em for the effective energy exchange
between them. 4) Provided further that the first, second and third
conditions are fulfilled, the orbital electron ring has to have
coincidental oscillatory phase with that of incoming em. Otherwise
there occurs a considerable destructive phase interference between
them. These 4 conditions are needed strictly in order to explain the
black body radiation, as well as the mechanism of forming laser
light.
(explanation of laser light by QM theory is totally false). If the
probability of satisfying condition 1) by an electron ring exposed in
a
continuous spectrum is P(1), the probability for condition 2), P(2),
the probability for condition 3), P(3), and the final probability for
condition 4), P(4), then total probability P to satisfy all the five
conditions becomes, P=P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4). It signifies that an orbital
electron ring is very difficult to have successively a lucky chance
to
meet a favorable em from which it can take up energy, and the same is
in the reverse case when an electron ring has the worst chance to
meet
the favorable em from which it can also take up energy. Consequently
the other group of atomic electron rings distributes between these
two
extreme cases. Thus the energy taken up by orbital electron rings by
frequency wise, would draw a curve that has indeed a marked
resemblance
to that obtained from maxwell's distribution law. This is the
explanation of black body radiation as well as avoiding ultraviolet
catastrophe.

But blackbody has a lot to do with the quantization of energy
in em waves (photons as energy quanta) and little to do with
the atom. Since you guys don't believe in photons at all. You
are attributing it to the atoms. Hmm...

Anyway. The most important of any theoretical idea is how it
explains things. Let's go to biochemistry. What can it predict that
current QM can't. I remember you mentioned about conformations
in proteins and ligands, etc. Also water in living system being
different in characteristic to water elsewhere. And how DNA
activations acquire the energy from the water... How? What does
it differ to convensional biochemistry principles??

About crystals formation. What does it differ to convensional
idea. NaCl or salt is mentioned. What special properties does it
have not explained by convensional biochemistry?? Etc.

Thanks dude.

zhayne

Nobody wants to talk physics with him, he is lonely so he is at least
posting his blather here. You can find crackpot theorist in every
field. Have compassion - he may not understand how science works but at
least he is not a pompous cheat like Dr.Taj-Mahal. Let him go on with
his yoony mission and maybe one day he will prevail, uncovering this
huge conspiracy in physics.

THE STAR GATE IS REALLY REALLY REVVING UP TODAY


05.05.05


alt.astronomy, sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur, alt.sci.planetary,
alt.dreams.castaneda


MAY 5, 2005


the sequel to May 5, 2000


don't ever forget the digits


05.05.05


..=2E..how the StarGate portal opened on may 5 2000 and why it is
important --and who is fighting who---


http://www.geocities.com/chemo=ADsh_.../NGC1987A.html


Kraken Warriors came to help us on May 5, 2000 and are still
helping....


http://www.angelfire.com/scifi=AD/kr...ors/index.html


these are the guys [aliens] that have dominated us since the pyramids
3000 BC, some in the guise of humans --- many have dynastic families
[e.g. GW Bush & Halliburton Company-- and intelligence webs--Vladimir
Putin--in their anuses]


http://carpathian_bronze.tripo=ADd.com/molybdenum.html


DON'T FORGET ABOUT PENTAGON'S "HAARP" MICROWAVE ELF TRANSMISSIONS
EITHER.


Facilitating Paradox
http://www.facilitatingparadox=AD.com/archives/2005/05/


May 05, 2005
Sinko de Mayo?
A fellow student recently suggested that the harmonic convergence was
coming May 5, 2005, not, as I had believed, on May 5, 2000. I tried
Googling this expected phenomenon and here's what I found:


I first used "harmonic convergence 5/5/2005" as my search criteria:


The ever-expanding list of the synchronous occurrence of the number
Twenty-Three (23) with application to the Law of Fives (2+3=3D5), part of

Unity of Multi, says that December 21, 2012 is "the date the Mayans
believed the world will end. (Terence McKenna thinks the Eschaton will
Immanetize.) Other theories suggest the ice caps, having become wobbly
from the gravitational pull exerted by the alignment of FIVE planets
directly opposing the earth on 5-5-2005, will cause the crust of the
earth to slip over the soggy innards, causing the ice caps to melt, and

new ones to form."


the reason why room_23 at hells.org (or at least that's what it says
at the top of the page...) says the same as above.
With at least one other site with a duplicate of the above, I knew I
had to change my search criteria. I tried "planets 5/5/2005"...
Rapture =3D Ascension =3D Power =3D 555, Part 1 of: I recently received an
e-mail from a brother in Christ. He stated: on Prophetic secret
thoughts from the Lord God Almighty!!!!!!! ... "the rapture is when the

Bride of Christ ascends into heaven and Jesus Christ meets us in the
air.


And that the only Christian Holy day commemorating Christ's ascension
and specifically pointing to our future ascension is Ascension Day. The

next Ascension Day is May 5, 2005, as marked on many calendars for even

non-believers to see." It goes on to say, "I personally started more
closely watching May 5, 2005 soon after May 5, 2000. There was a sign
on that date involving the sun, and the moon, and the stars as
specified in Luke 21:25 above, (planets are among the brightest of the
stars as they are the closest heavenly bodies. Sometimes they are
referred to as wandering stars as they "wander" against the backdrop of

the other stars that make up the constellations.)


On May 5, 2000 the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and
Saturn will be more or less positioned in a line with the Sun.
Additionally, the Moon will be almost lined up between the Earth and
Sun.


Note 5 planets as seen from Earth, on 5/5/00, hence 555. This seemed to

point to 5 years to the date from then, or 5/5/5. All 5 visible planets

were then situated in the constellation Taurus. From the God given
"gospel in the stars" (see Joseph Seiss's book and others), Taurus
stands for the Lord coming in great Power as in the Rapture/Ascension.


The next constellation is Gemini which is of "two human figures
closely united, and seated in endeared affection" as in the uniting of
the Bridegroom and the Bride, the Body of Christ directly following the

Rapture/Ascension." (Note, though, that the post quoted was dated April

1, 2005...)


I changed my search parameters again, this time to simply "planetary
alignment" and I started getting astronomy papers and articles.
Finally, something reputable...
An article entitled "Planetary Alignments in 2000" by John Mosley of
the Griffith Observatory, (extracted from "Cosmic Doom in 2000!" by
John Mosley, a feature article which appeared in the Planetarian, the
journal of the International Planetarium Society, March 1996,) has a
nice explanation of the alignment of May 5, 2000, but states that the
next close convergence will not take place until April 22, 2438.


NOTE: WE HAVE BEEN PLAGUED BY EARTHQUAKES AND VOLCANOES AND SHIFTING
POLE CAPS AND GLOBAL WARMING A HELL OF A LOT SINCE 1999!!


None of the other astronomy sites or articles had any mention of
anything significant happening in 2005, but one of the sites I visited
was called Bad Astronomy, with an article entitled Harmonic
Con(game)vergence: "Bad Astronomy: Planetary alignments will cause
earthquakes. Good astronomy: Planetary alignments have relatively
little to do with earthquakes."


It's interesting that the ancient Mayans (or at least modern
interpreters of the ancient Mayans) and present-day funamentalist
rapture-seekers are aligned in expectation on May 5, 2005, but the
scientific community sees no expected alignment in the stars on that
date. ...That's my indulgent research for the day. I've got to get
back to work. If you have any other info on a harmonic convergence or
planetary alignment happening on Cinco de Mayo 2005, let me know.


DON'T FORGET ABOUT PENTAGON'S HAARP MICROWAVE ELF TRANSMISSIONS EITHER.

And how does this lead to a spherical wave, exactly?

Alas! It appears that you particle physicists lost completely your
sound mentality to distinguish what is science and what is falsehood. I
know your people believe that electron is a group of matter waves, and
photon is a group of electromagnetic waves. And their behaviors are
dealt with probability logics. Bah! All false! Probability logics
cannot describe the truth of nature. How long do you continue to
believe these fraudulent knowledge invented by big bosses of particle
physicists in the old day, in order to justify their non-scientific
photon theory? Are you also going to continue teaching innocent young
generations with these fraudulent science? Particle physicists say
pointing a map this is the United States. Although this is a piece of
paper and not a real thing it is useful for our live. However, people
do not want to see this paper diagram incorrectly drawn, but want to
know the real United States. People also do not want to see poorly
drawn flowers but real flowers. Science is not for use of human life,
but to discover the mystery of elegant natural law.
You see this kind of real science, concerned to double slit experiment
that proves light is not a flow of corpuscular photons. If this
continuous wave front of light is double slitted then two light beams
which turn out to develop into two spherical waves are made possible.
Do you know how these slitted light beams can be developed into
spherical wavess as they propagate? Because the flow of light energy
occurs not only to its proceeding direction but also to its
perpendicular direction when the wave front is cut by a slit. Thus
light can bend to go inside the shadow made by a shield. I know
particle physicists do not know this science. Thus the slitted light
beam build two spherical wave fronts, A and B. When two spherical wave
fronts of both A, B running in tandem interfere constructively, 0th
order diffractive beam is built possible. If second spherical wave
phase of A and first spherical wave phase of B interfere, then 1st
order diffractive beam is made. When third spherical wave phase of A
and first spherical wave phase of B interfere, then 2nd order
diffractive beam is built and so on. This is the case only when the
distance between two slits is too large to be n times the wavelengths
of incident light. If this distance has a half wavelength of incoming
light, then there is constructed only a single diffraction beam. This
is nothing else than the refractive beam. Dr. Yoon elegantly explains
refraction and diffraction phenomena with a unified logics. Very
simple! Why probability logic of electron wave and mass wave, as well
as Bragg's diffraction rule are all necessary in explaining this simple
double slit experiment? Truth of natural rule is simple, and is not
complicate. newedana

put some air between your lines

I cant read unintrerruptabled more
than two lines

if somthin span unintrerruptabled more than
two lines, then it is very probable that it is
nothin but bull****

newedana wrote:
In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, "If we arrange these 6 sets
of hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths,

What on earth is that supposed to mean?


we find an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as
shown in Fig.5-5-1, and table 5-2 (a map of spectral series). It
signifies that there exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of
spectra. The largest energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer
series, the secondary larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen
series and no energy gap between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series.
After Brackett series, we find that their spectral series turn out to
overlap with one another, and the overlapping zone becomes
progressively broader and broader".
He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron
ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and
Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without
frequency choice.

What on earth is that supposed to mean?


That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital
electron rings has like a continuous pattern,

Huh??? No bound hydrogen spectra are continuous!


and any kind of mass
bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice. He
explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be
shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater
and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its
radius,

Why should it?


and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency
choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation.

How?


And that
is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach
its nucleus.

Huh? "That"? What?


He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the
restructuring the texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes
produced by orbital electron rings, as it changes its orbital radius;

You become more and more incomprehensible.


the shorter the radius of electron ring the greater the energy input
for the restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes.

Why should it?



When the shrunk
orbital electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this
energy it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission
and fusion energy.

Feel free to support this assertion with experimental evidence.


Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid
equation, E=mc^2.

What is stupid about that equation? It *works*.


Bye,
Bjoern

zhayne wrote:

[snip]

How did your Dr. Yoon explain Black Body Radiation? What is the
mechanism that prevented Ultraviolet Catastrophe since you guys
don't believe in Planck when he said that it is not possible for
an oscillator to absorb and emit energy in a continuous range and
it must gain and lose energy discontinuously, in small indivisible
units of e = h f, which Planck called "energy quanta".

"you guys"?


[snip]


Going to atomic dynamics. Classical laws says that revolving
electron would radiate away its energy and collapse into the
nucleus. Granted your magnetic field induced in the electron
electric field tails (lagging effect) through some unknown
mechanism can repel the nucleus in a kinda of modified Meissner
like effect attributing for its stability similar to the
de_broglie standing waves holding the orbitals,

You shouldn't grant that. It's pure nonsense.


[snip]

Bye,
Bjoern