![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edward Smith" wrote in message ... OK. The obvious answer here is I don't, at least with any accuracy. I left the telescope inside tonight. There were high level clouds to the north and I couldn't make out Polaris. I considered taking the telescope out anyway but left it inside and am settling for Binoculars. That brought up the question about how to polar align when I couldn't make out Polaris. Worth remembering, that Polaris, is only a 'starting point' anyway. It allows you (with a good polar scope), to get within a few fractions of a degree. Hence the process is iterative. Normally you start from the 'Polaris' reference, and then improve the accuracy by drift alignment. All that not being able to see Polaris does, is potentially degrade the 'starting point' I had some thoughts. First, I could get a good polar alignment and simply make reference marks on both the ground where the tripod was set (probably drive some tent stakes into the earth) and on the mount. Then I could recreate at least a rough polar alignment in my most common viewing location (read, back yard) anytime I wanted. I could also do it by simply using a compass, correct for the magnetic deviation at my location, and use my lattitude. Yes. Either method will give you a starting point, that is nearly as good as Polaris (may even be better...). One route for instance, is where there is a fixed site, is to drift align, then mark the tripod leg positions, and then if there are landmarks visible on the horizon, observe the eyepiece/viewfinder view of the horizon, with a fixed RA/Dec reading. If you reposition, and adjust to have the same view, the starting point will be better than Polaris offers. With a good compass/level, allowing for magnetic deviation, it is possible to easily get a good starting point. Because I am just starting to explore with the telescope and have been having "finder scope alignment issues", I decided to pass on the telescope until I could get a good polar alignment (which I can do most nights, I should be out tomorrow). Any other suggestions? Everyone in the southern hemisphere, faces this all the time. There are quite a few articles on the web about setup in these locations. Best Wishes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Smith wrote in
: Use star drift in your eyepiece to correct alignment. Do a rough polar alignment. Use a star in the south sky at moderate elevation and center it in your eyepiece, preferably with a crosshair, and with high magnification. Now start following and see if the star drifts from the center. Depending on what you use (say a zenithprism) the drift up or down corresponds to an off setting to either the east or the west. From the top of my head - with zenithprism: drift down more to the east and drift up in your eyepiece move your mount more westward. Please others here correct me if I'm wrong. And _if_ I am, you'll notice soon enough and you have to reverse my instructions ![]() After you have adapted the mount, center again and start all oveer again. A few stints and you have a fine alignment. I had read about this in the telescope manual, but wasn't sure how valid it was. From what I could gather, what you are doing is using the error in the tracking to correct your polar alignment. The manual actually has all of the directions (up, down, left, and right) and how to correct. I'll have to play with the geometry until I understand it. It is the most accurate way of aligning your mount if done carefully. You don't need a lot of accuracy for visual observing though. L. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Smith wrote in
: Use star drift in your eyepiece to correct alignment. Do a rough polar alignment. Use a star in the south sky at moderate elevation and center it in your eyepiece, preferably with a crosshair, and with high magnification. Now start following and see if the star drifts from the center. Depending on what you use (say a zenithprism) the drift up or down corresponds to an off setting to either the east or the west. From the top of my head - with zenithprism: drift down more to the east and drift up in your eyepiece move your mount more westward. Please others here correct me if I'm wrong. And _if_ I am, you'll notice soon enough and you have to reverse my instructions ![]() After you have adapted the mount, center again and start all oveer again. A few stints and you have a fine alignment. I had read about this in the telescope manual, but wasn't sure how valid it was. From what I could gather, what you are doing is using the error in the tracking to correct your polar alignment. The manual actually has all of the directions (up, down, left, and right) and how to correct. I'll have to play with the geometry until I understand it. It is the most accurate way of aligning your mount if done carefully. You don't need a lot of accuracy for visual observing though. L. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Polaris: Precession & Proper Motion | Sandy Tipper | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 04 02:46 PM |
Water ice discovered at South Polar Cap of Mars. | MarkMcDonald | Space Science Misc | 1 | February 14th 04 01:10 AM |
Cosmological Polaris effect | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 23rd 04 05:02 PM |
Mars Is Melting | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 7th 03 09:19 PM |
Payload comparison - polar vs. low inclination | MattWriter | Technology | 0 | July 22nd 03 05:10 PM |