![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lasers will not give away the position of the weapon or leave behind any physical evidence showing who is responsible for the attack. Things will just seem to suddenly explode for no apparent reason with laser strikes. Whether placed in Hummers, or a C-130 [1] where its laser already can pop a tire at five miles. Or mounted on a naval vessel [2]. Or whether the attack is from a ground based laser, such as the Starfire Optical Range [3] where the beam might be directed globally using a constellation of mirrors [4] in low earth orbit. Or whether some laser is mounted in a future version of our military space plane [5], which is set to launch this month. They will all have one common element. Which is that the target will explode without any warning, and without leaving behind any evidence of who or what was responsible for the attack. Is this the future of modern warfare? In any event, I feel very fortunate to be on the ...same side of the folks building this stuff. Jonathan [1] Advanced Tactical Laser http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/des/index.html [2] Maritime Laser Demonstration http://www.armybase.us/2010/01/marit...aval-research/ [3] Starfire http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/28/s...sciences-sake/ [4] Advanced Relay Mirror System http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/arms.htm [5] Military Space plane X-37b http://news.cnet.com/military-tech/?keyword=Boeing s |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 5:45*am, "Jonathan" wrote:
Lasers will not give away the position of the weapon or leave behind any physical evidence showing who is responsible for the attack. Things will just seem to suddenly explode for no apparent reason with laser strikes. Whether placed in Hummers, or a C-130 [1] where its laser already can pop a tire at five miles. Or mounted on a naval vessel [2]. Or whether the attack is from a ground based laser, such as the Starfire Optical Range [3] where the beam might be directed globally using a constellation of mirrors [4] *in low earth orbit. Or whether some laser is mounted in a future version of our military space plane [5], which is set to launch this month. They will all have one common element. Which is that the target will explode without any warning, and without leaving behind any evidence of who or what was responsible for the attack. Is this the future of modern warfare? In any event, I feel very fortunate to be on the ...same side of the folks building this stuff. Jonathan [1] Advanced Tactical Laserhttp://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/des/index.html [2] Maritime Laser Demonstrationhttp://www.armybase.us/2010/01/maritime-laser-demonstration-mld-passe... [3] Starfirehttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/28/starfire-optical-range-a-death-ray... [4] Advanced Relay Mirror Systemhttp://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/arms.htm [5] Military Space plane X-37bhttp://news.cnet.com/military-tech/?keyword=Boeing s It just makes makes murder, mayhem, and misuse more likely. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "lorad" wrote in message ... It just makes murder, mayhem, and misuse more likely. That's what bothers me also, as our ability to reduce civilian casualties increases, it might make the use of those weapons more likely. Maybe even leading to essentially a constant state or war, which the war on terror seems to be. Wouldn't that scenario, where our military is zapping some evil-doer on a daily basis, turn our military into more of an international police force? If we build the capability which allows us to be the policemen of the world, do we then have a moral obligation to become just that? Jonathan s |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 9:32*am, "Jonathan" wrote:
If we build the capability which allows us to be the policemen of the world, do we then have a moral obligation to become just that? Jonathan The US is relatively short on secret-police experience, we never had an OAS or IRA or ETA or Red Army Faction to suppress. And it's a necessary GloboCop skill I hope we don't have to acquire. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Wilkins" wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 9:32 am, "Jonathan" wrote: If we build the capability which allows us to be the policemen of the world, do we then have a moral obligation to become just that? Jonathan The US is relatively short on secret-police experience, we never had an OAS or IRA or ETA or Red Army Faction to suppress. And it's a necessary GloboCop skill I hope we don't have to acquire. It's looking to me like the war on terror is creating that ability. We seem to make some bad guy explode on a pretty regular basis these days, going on ten years really. And reading some of the military literature concerning the kinds of capabilities the military wants ten and twenty years out, it looks like our technology advances with missile defense will translate to a very effective world-wide precision strike capability. Missile defense will do more than just destroy launching and incoming missiles, but they want to be able to immediately track the mobile launcher and take it out in real time. And everything points towards lasers as the answer. The scenario below clearly shows how a missile defense system can be directly turned into an offensive system. (2006) US ARMY SPACE MASTER PLAN "Future Scenario" "In a future small, regional conflict (2020), a threat force launches a theater ballistic missile at US/coalition forces using a Transporter Erector Launch vehicle (TEL). TheSpace-Based IntraRed Sensor (SBIRS) System detects the launch and tracks the missile through burn-out, providing data to the Joint Tactical Ground Station/Multi-Mission Mobile Processor (JTAGS/M3P). The JTAGS/M3P predicts the trajectory path from SBIRS data and passes that information to missile defense interceptors; it also provides missile warning messages to other appropriate theater network based oni mpact point predictions. SBIRS also provides a machine-to-machine cue, with the estimated launch point, to the Space Radar system. The Space Radar (SR) platform uses a real-time prioritizing algorithm (based on a priori rule sets) to re-stack its collection order and repositions its antenna to provide radar moving target indicator coverage of the estimated launch point." "The SR tracks the TEL when it begins to move to its hide site, and passes the track information through the Distributed Common Ground System to either the Joint Operations Center or the Joint Air Defense OperationCenter for assigning a weapons platform to the TEL. Space Radar continues to provide track information to the assigned weapons platform while it is enroute, enabling the weapons platform to quickly locate and kill the target." http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=...BdDX5oAJyvgc1g DIRECTED ENERGY DIRECTORATE "Long Range Strike - Identify, communicate and attack time critical targets anytime; anywhere." http://www.kirtland.af.mil/library/f...et.asp?id=7971 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan wrote:
It's looking to me like the war on terror is creating that ability. We seem to make some bad guy explode on a pretty regular basis these days, going on ten years really. It makes wedding parties explode as well. It isn't the weapons that need improvement, it's the targeting... -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jonathan" wrote: Lasers will not give away the position of the weapon or leave behind any physical evidence showing who is responsible for the attack. Things will just seem to suddenly explode for no apparent reason with laser strikes. Whether placed in Hummers, or a C-130 [1] where its laser already can pop a tire at five miles. Or mounted on a naval vessel [2]. Surface based lasers are limited to LOS horizon, silly. Or whether the attack is from a ground based laser, such as the Starfire Optical Range [3] where the beam might be directed globally using a constellation of mirrors [4] in low earth orbit. That's better. Or whether some laser is mounted in a future version of our military space plane [5], which is set to launch this month. They will all have one common element. Which is that the target will explode without any warning, and without leaving behind any evidence of who or what was responsible for the attack. Is this the future of modern warfare? In any event, I feel very fortunate to be on the ...same side of the folks building this stuff. Amen. -- Neolibertarian "[The American People] know that we don't have deficits because people are taxed too little; we have deficits because big government spends too much." ---Ronald Reagan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could the Mars Rover Technology become Military Weapons? | Pat Flannery | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 10th 09 04:05 PM |
Could the Mars Rover Technology become Military Weapons? | Pat Flannery | Policy | 0 | November 10th 09 04:05 PM |
Could the Mars Rover Technology become Military Weapons? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 10th 09 01:52 PM |
Could the Mars Rover Technology become Military Weapons? | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | November 10th 09 01:52 PM |
military weapons | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | April 19th 07 10:51 AM |