![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 8:00*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the *"Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious.. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. ~ BG |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 9:22*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? *For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. *You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. So, your god likes to play word games, and to otherwise traumatize humanity and our environment for all it's worth? Sounds exactly like a Zionist Nazi god to me. ~ BG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 9:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. So, your god likes to play word games, and to otherwise traumatize humanity and our environment for all it's worth? Sounds exactly like a Zionist Nazi god to me. **This world and all that is in it is passing away. Then all that will be left is the optimum world we all hope and aspire toward. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 9:41*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 9:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. So, your god likes to play word games, and to otherwise traumatize humanity and our environment for all it's worth? Sounds exactly like a Zionist Nazi god to me. **This world and all that is in it is passing away. Then all that will be left is the optimum world we all hope and aspire toward. A global waste land of toxic pollution and ocean dead zones that only the rich and powerful can afford to live large enough to deal with, sounds terrific. ~ BG ~ BG |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 9:41 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 9:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. So, your god likes to play word games, and to otherwise traumatize humanity and our environment for all it's worth? Sounds exactly like a Zionist Nazi god to me. **This world and all that is in it is passing away. Then all that will be left is the optimum world we all hope and aspire toward. A global waste land of toxic pollution and ocean dead zones that only the rich and powerful can afford to live large enough to deal with, sounds terrific. **We haven't been hit by thermonuclear war, yet. You are getting the cart before the horse. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 11:24*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 9:41 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 9:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 8:00 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. At the moment of the Big Bang there was no such thing as size, because there was nothing to compare to. So saying it was the primieval atom makes as much sense as just about anything else congitively possible. And there is not much intelligible, about the Big Bang. That is the way that the gods would have it. In this case, your god(s) screwed up, and then having left the scene of the crime. **Crime? For making things mysterious? Lots of good fiction writers do that. Any god worth their salt that can muster up 0.0001% of a universe is essentially responsible for 100% of everything that goes wrong. You don't just get to take credit for the good stuff, unless you're a Zionist Nazi. **You can't have good later, unless you have evil now. Every person that goes to work and finally draws a paycheck is familiar with that one. So, your god likes to play word games, and to otherwise traumatize humanity and our environment for all it's worth? Sounds exactly like a Zionist Nazi god to me. **This world and all that is in it is passing away. Then all that will be left is the optimum world we all hope and aspire toward. A global waste land of toxic pollution and ocean dead zones that only the rich and powerful can afford to live large enough to deal with, sounds terrific. **We haven't been hit by thermonuclear war, yet. You are getting the cart before the horse. There's worse things than global nuclear war, like artificially caused internal illness, biological mutations, systemic and even cultivated starvation and the continual fear banishment and for having to survive every second of each and every day on your own. When you have nothing further lose is when becoming a suicide bomber or whatever suicide terrorist doesn't look so bad. ~ BG |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. I don't think anyone ever specified the exact size ... they call it a "Singularity", which really means that all the "stuff" out there was packed into a sphere with no empty spaces between the sub-atomic particles. If you think of the Solar System, which is about 2.5 LYs across when including the Oort Cloud, as being analogous to an atom, and you pack all the planets, asteroids and comets into the Sun, the mass of the Sun would increase by less than 0.1%, but the diameter of the Solar System would shrink from 2.5 LYs to about 865,000 miles. A Black Hole the size of the Moon could in theory hold billions of Solar masses, but still would be far from the density of a Singularity. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar My idea of a singularity need not have an atom or even
sub-microscopic particles. It could be in my mind just a location of space.at this pont in spacetime where space energy was condensed by gravities great compression force in the micro realm Its reference to by imperial thinkers as a "rupture in space" Out of this thinking came my method (theory) for the BB,and its equation Gravity + space energy = BB TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if? (On hydrogen Atom) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 21 | January 30th 08 12:21 AM |
accelerating every atom equally | [email protected] | Policy | 2 | December 14th 07 10:10 AM |
The biggest atom | Spring | Misc | 1 | October 17th 06 09:08 PM |
market size as a function of launcher size | Parallax | Policy | 12 | September 23rd 03 11:14 PM |
Rutherford Atom Revisited | Rob Oldershaw | Research | 0 | July 2nd 03 04:46 PM |