THE POWER OF EINSTEINIANA

On Dec 19, 11:58 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Unlike Einstein's Relativity,
Quantum Mechanics is just a bundle of statistics from heaps of data
-- it's predictive, but semi-random, incomplete.
Relativity is predictive And fully complete, sans randomness.


QM is 100% correct. SR/GR is 100% fallacy.

On Dec 19, 6:22*am, Dono wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:



Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

Nice, a direct affiliation with the electric universe fruitloops.


How come YOU didn't sign Pacheco? You missed the opportunity to eat
some crow now (in addition to the **** you are eating daily)

Holy **** the list of signatories is interesting.

Arp? Only interesting thing I ever heard from him was back in the 80's
he supposedly found a binning of redshifts, which didn't hold up to
scrutiny.

Baryshev? Crank author on arXiv.

Marmet? Lerner? More cranks.

Peter J Carroll, Psychonaut Institute, UK -- Read it again -
_psychonaut institute_.

Our old friend Tom van Flandern...

Puthoff has an amusing history. Probably knows the guy from the
psychonaut institute.

I wonder why people think science is done by popular vote.

On Dec 19, 1:16*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
I wonder why people think science is done by popular vote.

It would appear these people think like you...

On Dec 19, 10:04*am, "Strich.9" wrote:
On Dec 19, 1:16*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

I wonder why people think science is done by popular vote.

It would appear these people think like you...

Except I do not feel science is done by popular vote.

On Dec 19, 2:58*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Dec 19, 10:04*am, "Strich.9" wrote:

On Dec 19, 1:16*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

I wonder why people think science is done by popular vote.

It would appear these people think like you...

Except I do not feel science is done by popular vote.

You may not feel so, but you think and do so.

Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html

Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real � and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated.

Ahahaha... There is no way out. To achieve what Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar proposed, space must exhibit in negative
mass density. That means a cubic centimeters of space contains so
much negative kilograms of mass. That idea is so f*cking stupid that
it is ever so surprising that so many nitwits have licked it up. Even
Einstein the same nitwit, the same plagiarist, and the same liar
reneged on his own proposal. Does that mean all these nitwits who
licked up on Einstein�s fermented diarrhea are even more stupid than
Einstein that nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar?









In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" � and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value.

It sounds like fairy tale to me. No? Is someone trying to insult the
intelligence of the ones who saw through Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar being nothing more than a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar?

The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Generation after generation in intoxicating itself with the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar would
always say the best prayer. snrug

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

What can I say? The Einstein Dingleberries have long voluntarily and
happily replaced their thinking brains with excrements. They had sold
their soles for these journalism-glorified positions in the academics
that worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. They
love to lick up the fermented diarrhea of Einstein anywhere and
anytime. shrug

You have a point here

While everything increasing big collapse, as the economies for
instance, I cant see why or how Relativity with its, to many phds in
physics on this planet inflated, will not collapse

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:22:13 -0800 (PST), Dono
wrote:

On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html


How come YOU didn't sign Pacheco? You missed the opportunity to eat
some crow now (in addition to the **** you are eating daily)
The signup sheet does not appear when you click for it.

"Androcles" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html
Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated.

"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
Ahahaha... There is no way out. To achieve what Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar proposed, space must exhibit in negative
mass density. That means a cubic centimeters of space contains so
much negative kilograms of mass. That idea is so f*cking stupid that
it is ever so surprising that so many nitwits have licked it up. Even
Einstein the same nitwit, the same plagiarist, and the same liar
reneged on his own proposal. Does that mean all these nitwits who
licked up on Einstein’s fermented diarrhea are even more stupid than
Einstein that nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar?

Androcles wrote:
The nitwit, plagiarist and liar is too stupid to realise the fermented
diarrhea aka dork energy has always been known as aether.

hanson wrote:
Andro, you must have re-read the thread "Aether's polylogy"
--- http://tinyurl.com/4bekrj --- wherein it says :
"Like air, sound & heat that you can't see neither, it's all around and
it's called Aether.... and denial is in vain and gives you pain..cuz ...
Aether, like the dust,.. will just rise again and again and again"...

There are many ways to skin the cat... and it's good to hear that
you've gotten "religion" now. Happy Festivities to you, John Parker.
And all the Best too, to Pentcho and to Koobee Wublee... and
thanks for all the laughs, guys!!!!... ahahaha... ahahahanson


Pentcho Valev wrote:
In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value.

"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
It sounds like fairy tale to me. No? Is someone trying to insult the
intelligence of the ones who saw through Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar being nothing more than a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar?

Pentcho Valev wrote:
The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
Generation after generation in intoxicating itself with the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar would
always say the best prayer. snrug

Pentcho Valev wrote:
Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:
http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html
are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

"Koobee Wublee" wrote:
What can I say? The Einstein Dingleberries have long voluntarily and
happily replaced their thinking brains with excrements. They had sold
their soles for these journalism-glorified positions in the academics
that worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. They
love to lick up the fermented diarrhea of Einstein anywhere and
anytime. shrug

On Dec 19, 6:47*am, Ian Parker wrote:
Absolute nonsense. The ultimate fate of the Universe is interesting.
Will we indeed be ripped apart in n billion years. However all thi.s
has little to do with relativity as such. Special Relativity works,
all the experiments have proved it.

* - Ian Parker

xxein: You said "1) Any theory must have GTR as one of its
components. GTR must
represent a limiting case."

Then why should a superior theory include GTR unless it is just a
manna?

On Dec 19, 11:58 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Unlike Einstein's Relativity,
Quantum Mechanics is just a bundle of statistics from heaps of data
-- it's predictive, but semi-random, incomplete.
Relativity is predictive And fully complete, sans randomness.

Perhaps objects vibrate faster at lower altitudes,
thus warping spacetime -- and our simple/3-D minds model it as a force.

When a muon from a cosmic ray -- moving near the speed of light --
hits you, its momentum is very real, not " notional ".
In fact, it'd have infinite momentum, if it could move at c.

Likewise, its slower tick-rate is real, not notional.

Muons are natural clocks -- we know how long they live --
and we know that -- to us humans -- they live longer when
moving near the speed of light.

xxein: What would change their speed? Nothing of/to within their own
environment.

Would you like to say that they had a sub-light speed and that our
gravity increased it thus increasing their longevity?

You would be so wrong. The fact is that we measure a position wrt
time. We do so under the same/similar gravity.

It's too long to explain. Sorry I bothered you.

Confusing? Yes it is unless you understand what gravity is.